Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Andrew Luck in Pro Bowl


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
31 replies to this topic

#25 Guest_BlueBoy_*

Guest_BlueBoy_*
Guests

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:12 AM

Luck had a good season. He helped Colts to the playoffs and yes, he did have a lot of interceptions because they asked him to throw too much. Luck's arm isn't as strong as Cam, Flacco or Stafford. I expect fewer INTs next year when they return to WCO. He was better than a lot AFC Quarterbacks like Dalton and Schaub.


I don't understand the Luck, WIlson, RG3 or Kaep hate. Cam will be in the playoffs and has more talent, but it just took more time and Panthers had more bad luck then the other teams. The team needed 4 more plays to make the playoffs.


Luck didn't 'help' anybody. he was just a participant. How would you feel like if your team was -14 points (2 TOs) disadvantage before each game?

Hope Luck is in the weight room right now trying to strengthen that noodle arm.

#26 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 47,988
  • Reputation: 15,552
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:13 AM

you're also under the false impression that the probowl is about who is the best rather than the most hyped.


Every time someone brings up the Pro Bowl in an argument about how good a certain QB is, I give 'em the McKayla Maroney look.

Few things are more meaningless than Pro Bowls.

But hey, we gotta find something to be pissed about, right? :unsure:

#27 tiger7_88

tiger7_88

    old skool SWAG

  • Joined: 12-May 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,217
  • Reputation: 2,905
HUDDLER

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:14 AM

you're also under the false impression that the probowl is about who is the best rather than the most hyped.


Yet my point remains... Luck, as extremely average as he was, *was* one of the "better" QBs in the AFC.

#28 Guest_BlueBoy_*

Guest_BlueBoy_*
Guests

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:14 AM

ProBowl is a joke and not reflective of anything.

On that note, Cam went last year. Same deal. Neither Cam nor Luck belonged in a Pro Bowl.

Good Rookies, but not pro bowlers.

Cam had probowl numbers though.

#29 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,759
  • Reputation: 7,990
Moderators

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:21 AM

Yet my point remains... Luck, as extremely average as he was, *was* one of the "better" QBs in the AFC.

yep.

not really an impressive list of QBs there. i mean they've got brady, peyton....flacco?....mr. game manager schaub, phillip "slow man" rivers, andy "thank goodness they drafted aj green" dalton, big "i get hurt real bad every season" ben....meh.

#30 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,425
  • Reputation: 8,328
HUDDLER

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:24 AM

It wasn't that long ago that the pro bowl was on the chopping block. I think it's on borrowed time now.

#31 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,759
  • Reputation: 1,478
HUDDLER

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:46 AM

There was no way the NFL wasnt gonna put Luck and RG3 in the pro bowl if Cam made it in.

#32 fjblair

fjblair

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 29-June 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,124
  • Reputation: 154
HUDDLER

Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:27 PM

Pro Bowl is a beauty contest so who cares?