Jump to content

- - - - -

Gettleman not sold on read option

  • Please log in to reply
227 replies to this topic

#31 Gabeking



  • Joined: 27-February 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,503
  • Reputation: 1,642

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:12 AM

BTW he said 10 of the 12 teams in the playoffs didn't use it. Actually that number is 9. The 3 teams that did use the read option, were out of 4 teams in the league that used it extensively.

Maybe he should look at it like this. 3 out of 4 teams that heavily utilized the read option, made the playoffs.

I hope we didn't hire a dinosaur!! If so we went from being ahead of the curve in 2011 to behind the curve in 2013.

He never said to take it away completely, but he's against keeping it as a staple of the offense, which I agree with. Do you think rg3 is gonna last 10 years using the read option the way he does? Even cam was slow to get up much more often in the last half of the season than the first half of the season, you gonna argue that wasnt because of the heavy usage of the read option?

#32 TheRumGone


    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • posts: 11,388
  • Reputation: 9,239
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:12 AM

The first half of the season was very similar to the second half of the season in terms of utilizing the read option. We just tightened the formations. I'm willing to bet Cam had more rushing yards the last half of the season than he did the first half of the season

I don't see it this way. The first half of the season was a failure because of leaning on the read option. Someone on here had actually counted the amount of times we used the read option from the first half compared to the second half. And it was a lot higher than the second half. When we started putting Cam under center, then sprinkle in the read option is when we were most successful. The Atlanta game comes to mind. When you utilize it in certain situations, you give the Defense another look that they haven't seen all game. Hence, Cam breaking off a 70 yard TD run. When you consistently use it, the Defense adjusts. The element of surprise is no longer there.

This also has to do with the O line. They have to block for an extended period of time, something that our weak O line had trouble with. This also hurts the O line's stamina. I like what Gettleman is pushing for, and I think a lot of people here agree, from what I've read.

Think of the spread option as a play action pass. When you continually use it you are not tricking anybody. They see your tendencies. Having a more balanced attack with a traditional attack, with the spread option sprinkled in is when we found the most success. I blame Cam's "sophmore slump" entirely on Chud and Rivera not making him stop that BS.

#33 iampantherman



  • Joined: 02-August 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 317
  • Reputation: 34

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:15 AM

He must have just finished watching game tape of our first 6 games or so....This is good. Just sprinkle the read option in. Notice he said staple of the offense. Not completely going away from it.

This. As with anything in football, it is more effective when it can catch an opponent off-guard. The way Chud used it, especially early-on, Cam may as well have audibled out loud, "Hey everybody, read option...did you hear me, I'm going to run the READ OPTION!" :P

Btw, Cam can still run even if we don't feature the read-option constantly. Whenever he sees the D in man, and he doesn't like the look any receiver is showing him, he is still free to take off and burn the D. He doesn't become less dangerous imo.

#34 PhillyB


    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,923
  • Reputation: 18,346
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:17 AM

getting rid of it complete is a terrible, terrible idea.

#35 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    I Don't Want To Get Off On A Rant Here But....

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,895
  • Reputation: 4,233

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:17 AM

guess what else exposes a QB to hits


Not an issue with a competent OLine.
We dont have one.

#36 Guest_BlueBoy_*


Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:18 AM

The 49ers caught teams off guard with KP. I don't think that'll work too good against the Ravens. Next year teams will be more prepared for them just like they were for us, but I doubt the 49ers will use it as frequent as we did. I say let Cam be a pocket passer. Run the ball and some playaction and if Cam gets pressure or sees free yardage let him do what he does. Simple

I'm tired of listening to that moronic 'teams gonna figured it out' every week for the whole year and it never happens. Figuring it out is like figuring out the person's ability to run. The read option is not some magical wand. IT'S THE QB'S ABILITY TO RUN. Nothing to figure out. The read option is just a smart way of protecting QBs who can run. That's it. You can call a predictable play for the QB or an unpredictable play(read option). For crying out loud. The stupidity of sports and their fans. Gosh!

#37 Guest_BlueBoy_*


Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:21 AM

So, we're gonna turn Cam into Eli while Kaepernick and Wilson pile on superbowls? Damn, what a waste of talent.

#38 Marguide


    South of the Border

  • Joined: 13-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,748
  • Reputation: 2,344

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:26 AM

Someone on here had actually counted the amount of times we used the read option from the first half compared to the second half.

That was me. There were a few significant changes as we went into the 2nd half of the season:
1) Read option runs were way down compared to early in the year (maybe 50% less). Against NO, we ran it a total of 3 times.
2) The use of 2 TE formations increased as we went through the year.
3) We ran more plays from under center the last half of the year.

All that said, I don't want to see it eliminated either, as some of Cam's big gains came off those plays. Hopefully Gettleman just doesn't want us to go overboard.

#39 Udogg


    Cardiac Victim since 95

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,641
  • Reputation: 1,605

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:26 AM

Read option with lots of down field routes and no check downs was our downfall early in the year. Chud was slow to adapt. Even with the checkdowns added Cam was slow to use them. Around week 6 they started adding more short crossing patterns and flares. The run game as usual also started out atrocious. Once he started doing that, we started getting 4 and 5 yards on the check downs putting us in 3rd and short situations. Short down situations is where the read option was excelling. Especially with Cam being able to get a first down on 3rd and 1 pretty much automatically.




  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,398
  • Reputation: 1,664

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:26 AM

10-12 team in playoffs had pocket passers?

Skins, Seahawks and 49ers all run the option in some sort..
if i count correctly thats 3 out of the 4 teams that run zone option made the playoffs

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users