Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Armed guard stopped the Atlanta school shooter


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

#21 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,711
  • Reputation: 2,351
Moderators

Posted 01 February 2013 - 02:01 PM

GOVERNMENT SPENDING IS BAD!!! ALWAYS!!!

Unless it helps me.

- Every Conservative Ever

#22 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,820
  • Reputation: 4,806
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 02:08 PM

No, you are to pretend it's an awful idea because the NRA suggested it.

So did Obama, genius, it was in his executive actions.

#23 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,063
  • Reputation: 458
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 02:39 PM

Of course it was...in the form of grants. Now tell me why the NRA is catching hell.

#24 CatofWar

CatofWar

    Join, or Die

  • Joined: 24-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,487
  • Reputation: 865
  • LocationGitmo
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 03:28 PM

So did Obama, genius, it was in his executive actions.


Executive order you mean.

#25 Anybodyhome

Anybodyhome

    USN Retired

  • Joined: 07-July 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,515
  • Reputation: 2,431
  • LocationWherever I May Roam
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 06:17 PM

I'm curious as to why an armed off-duty cop is any different to an armed on-duty cop to you?

Did it say why that cop was there? His kid is there... something like that?


It didn't say anything and I'm assuming nothing...

... just asking the questions.

And there is a huge difference between and armed on- duty vs. off-duty cop. In most states, off-duty cops cannot carry their service weapon- if they choose to carry off-duty it must be their personal weapon. And no, I'm not assuming which it was in this case, either.

And, in most states, off-duty cops carry far less authority than on-duty. For example, an off-duty cop cannot attempt to pull you over in his own car.

A former police officer in my city lost his job and the department was sued when an off-duty cop first pulled over a woman while he was driving his personal vehicle, flashed her his badge and reportedly showed her he was carrying his service weapon when she questioned what he wanted. There was no probable cause, witnesses said he maneuvered his vehicle in an unsafe manner and no one believed he was a cop so he started with the badge and gun thing.

And the complete opposite could be true of your questions. Maybe the cop has no kids, may he's a pedo and took the job as an SRO just to be around kids.... jus' sayin' you gotta ask all the questions.

#26 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,415
  • Reputation: 2,347
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 07:00 PM

It's not the "armed guard" thing that's inherently bad (although these guards are mostly in high schools where gang violence is a bigger problem). It's the thinking behind it, that the ONLY solution for gun violence is....more guns. It's a terrible thing for our kids to have to accept, and something we as adults should be working to reverse.

#27 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 23,137
  • Reputation: 2,954
  • LocationMontford
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 07:47 PM

i dont think many are saying JUST having armed guards is the only way. i'm certainly not. but multi pronged approach certainly can't hurt.

if we are going to have an upheaval of health care instead of focusing on the uninsured first, i don't see why this can't be walked thru and done smartly.

after 9/11 you saw more police presence at parking decks and buildings and games and such. sometimes the mere presence can be all the deterrent needed.

if an armed person knows in advance that a person or persons are armed at a school, suddenly they have to change their mind. that alone is one of the cheapest and easiest things to implement.

gas stations have cops parked there all the time. why? just to surf the net and drink coffee? no. well, maybe. but ever notice how those places never seemed to get robbed?

i think the reason many oppose armed guards is it takes away the sting of being able to reach deeper into someones ability to own firearms.

do both. guards AND smarter gun laws. it makes sense.

#28 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,820
  • Reputation: 4,806
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 07:48 PM

Of course it was...in the form of grants. Now tell me why the NRA is catching hell.

Because they're a pos organization.

#29 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,529
  • Reputation: 1,266
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 10:23 PM

Because they're a pos organization.



#30 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • Joined: 28-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,637
  • Reputation: 3,571
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 10:51 PM

Let's all become a bigger police state, while masking the real issue at hand. Yayyyyy for incompetence everyone.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users