lol all better.....randy is old dude and i can even argue vernon is the no wr 1 and crabtree is the no 2
because vernon dont run like a te...he runs a 4.3 or something lol
but i wont do that and my point still stands.
tate/rice and s.moss/p.garcon(hurt for 6 games) all had better numbers.or more tds or more yards. they were not lights out better but still better.
the only number lafell has that compares well is the yards per catch.
and non of those dude are consider star no 2 wr...lol
so imo panthers need a wr in the 1st or 2nd.
Just stop dude you're being defiant to the point of stupidity.
Seahawks--- Moss is the number 1 and Tate is number 2. Tate numbers were 46 rec. 688 yards and 7 td (1 being that crap that shouldn't have counted due to the replacement refs). Not very different from Lafell.
49ers---- Carbtree is the number 1 and even if you want to use that Vernon argument (which doesn't work becauseI can just call Olsen the 2nd wr then) Lafell still had comparable stats. And he dominates every other WR on the roster. Beside Mannigham And Lafell numbers are better then his.
Redskins---I can't even tell who is the number 1-2 wr all their numbers are comparable to Lafell and you would have to add all the TE numbers together to equal Olsen.
So none of these teams had 2nd wr stars but all of them were in the playoffs. Maybe you should look and see what they did to make there offense so good.
Clue --- Good Oline----- Good Running Game------Good play caller.