Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Profootballfocus' Team Needs For the Carolina Panthers.


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#21 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,931
  • Reputation: 18,361
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:53 PM

I would love Dorsey.

#22 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,675
  • Reputation: 1,122
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:42 PM

How come almost every name they give us is coming off some sort of injury? I realize we need to go cheap, but do our cheap guys all need to be recovering from an injury?

There are going to be a whole lot of cheap guys out there this year. Maybe we should look at the healthy guys first, then settle for what we can get later.

Shcwartz, if healthy, would be a huge upgrade. Any DT worth his salt is an upgrade, as are DBs. But there are prescious few WR that could make us better. But get a good TE to pair with Olsen, and that very well make us a lot better.

Good and exciting times are acomin'. My giddy wouldn't lie to me.

#23 SauceBoss

SauceBoss

    IT IS WHAT IT IS

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,294
  • Reputation: 356
  • LocationGreenville, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 10 February 2013 - 09:32 PM

I quit reading when he said Frank Alexander was a DT.

#24 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,942
  • Reputation: 5,489
HUDDLER

Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:02 PM

Ok I realize we don't have a lot of money to go pursue free agents, but how much does PFF think signing Sammie Lee Hill will cost?

#25 micnificent28

micnificent28

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 23-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,159
  • Reputation: 455
  • LocationCharlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:02 PM

Barden is a great idea. I think he might be more talented than lafell. Dorsey would also get me fired up. That way the team could focus on the ol and secondary in the draft....lets hope gettleman magic is in effect.

#26 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,318
  • Reputation: 2,933
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:35 PM

This team gains nothing by adding Barden.


I would have said that before Barden torched us. Haven't seen too many of our WRs not named Smith have a game like that. None actually in a few years.

#27 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 12 February 2013 - 09:46 AM

I would have said that before Barden torched us. Haven't seen too many of our WRs not named Smith have a game like that. None actually in a few years.

we are the only team he's ever looked any good against.

only reason i would want him on this team is to keep him from being on another team and torching our D. i wouldn't expect him to look anything like that against any other team.

#28 BelgianPantherFan

BelgianPantherFan

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 19-November 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 502
  • Reputation: 239
  • LocationBelgium
HUDDLER

Posted 12 February 2013 - 09:49 AM

Are the ratings from PFF accurate in measuring a player's game? I already know that 'experts' from ESPN are bs, but can you count on PFF?

#29 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • posts: 15,597
  • Reputation: 1,635
SUPPORTER

Posted 12 February 2013 - 10:20 AM

How come almost every name they give us is coming off some sort of injury? I realize we need to go cheap, but do our cheap guys all need to be recovering from an injury?

There are going to be a whole lot of cheap guys out there this year. Maybe we should look at the healthy guys first, then settle for what we can get later.


PFF isn't game planning for Rivera/FO, but to include gaining solid talent at a cheap price in an article requires another factor, like injuries from a previous year, or else we aren't talking cheap.

#30 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,675
  • Reputation: 1,122
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 12 February 2013 - 12:41 PM

PFF isn't game planning for Rivera/FO, but to include gaining solid talent at a cheap price in an article requires another factor, like injuries from a previous year, or else we aren't talking cheap.


Ok, maybe cheap is the wrong word. How about inexpensive? We are talking one year contracts here. Reasonable pay, for a reasonbly good player. There very well could be a ton of guys, that fit that bill, looking for a job. Why not here?

Use the draft wisely, and fill in some holes with inexpensive FAs. That just may get us where we want to go.

By all accounts Gettlemen has been locked in the film room evaluating our team. If he sees a need that can be filled at a reasonble price. Why not go for it? I trust him to do whatever he can to help Rivera build a solid team. And I don't believe it takes a lot of money to do so. Especially this year.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users