i'd be fine with a situation like that, but i REALLY don't like the idea of taking a guard in the first. i don't care how studly they are. i'd rather draft impact players, which i don't consider interior OL to be, esp. guard. we can fill those holes more quickly and with less transition time by picking up vets in FA.I agree somewhat, and I know a guard isn't sexy...but part of my feelings from this just come from the talent at WR that should still be there in the 2nd.
A guy like Patterson in the 1st would be great...but I'd be happier with Warmack in the 1st and Patton in the 2nd for instance.
At least that's how I feel right now.
The Draft sucks (I really love it)
#16
Posted 19 February 2013 - 04:03 PM
#17
Posted 19 February 2013 - 04:12 PM
mr scott you make alot of questionable threads.
Better than most threads with all of the (wrong) answers XD
I entertain myself by trying to see how well I "know" the team by means of predicting free agents and draft picks vs. what my own personal choices would be. I can't say that I don't get excited when I get it right, but I think that comes from how often I get it wrong >.>
#18
Posted 19 February 2013 - 04:28 PM
Like last year, I was happy to have Kuech. Mostly because it wasn't Quinton Coples who i was sure would be a bust
#19
Posted 19 February 2013 - 04:30 PM
#20
Posted 19 February 2013 - 04:50 PM
i'd be fine with a situation like that, but i REALLY don't like the idea of taking a guard in the first. i don't care how studly they are. i'd rather draft impact players, which i don't consider interior OL to be, esp. guard. we can fill those holes more quickly and with less transition time by picking up vets in FA.
Normally I'd agree with you. But with Newton's running ability, and the stable of backs we have, a strong interior line is more important for us than most offenses. I wouldn't mind Warmack in the first, and Hopkins or a DT in the second. I feel like with Hardy, and CJ a top DT isn't as important, and we can get by with FAs.
#21
Posted 19 February 2013 - 04:53 PM
#22
Posted 19 February 2013 - 04:54 PM
(I have a hard time buying that)
#23
Posted 19 February 2013 - 05:02 PM
Mayock is talking about the possibility of Warmack going number one.
(I have a hard time buying that)
Cooper as well if I'm not mistaken. Pretty sure he said only 4 players should be considered, named the top 2 guards and 2 LT I think.
#24
Posted 19 February 2013 - 05:05 PM
i'd be fine with a situation like that, but i REALLY don't like the idea of taking a guard in the first. i don't care how studly they are. i'd rather draft impact players, which i don't consider interior OL to be, esp. guard. we can fill those holes more quickly and with less transition time by picking up vets in FA.
Agreed. As it stands right now, without FA, those are my thoughts. Obviously it changes if we pick up a guard in FA and vice versa for whatever position is at hand.
Our OL last year could've used its share of impact guys...bringing a guy like Warmack gives us a potentially nasty line. As it stands now, without FA pickups, bringing in a WR still leaves Cam scrambling behind our roller skating OL from last year. And obviously injuries played a role, etc., but protecting Cam is goal numero uno IMO ahead of supplying him with weapons.
#25
Posted 19 February 2013 - 05:10 PM
#26
Posted 19 February 2013 - 05:23 PM
#27
Posted 19 February 2013 - 05:46 PM
#28
Posted 19 February 2013 - 06:02 PM
i'm just happy to not have this feeling of dread over me wondering what dumb draft day trade thing hurney was going to try and pull.I'm really hoping for the negative feelings to ease with Gettleman in charge rather than Hurney.
i swear i hated that. the guy was good at picking in the first round. not sure why he wanted so desperately to trade that away. he was just never as good a poker gambler as he thought he was. he considered himself a surfer bob protege, but it seemed like all he did was absorb the trade up for ryan leaf germ instead of the good stuff.
#29
Posted 19 February 2013 - 06:03 PM
I wouldn't say I ever hated the draft, just sometimes didn't like what the Panthers did.
Like last year, I was happy to have Kuech. Mostly because it wasn't Quinton Coples who i was sure would be a bust
dont talk about my boy Q. Coples like that, we graduated together. he is not a bust
#30
Posted 19 February 2013 - 06:05 PM
he is what we thought he was.
kuechly >>>> coples. not even close.
the best thing about not drafting him is i don't have to look at that incredibly ugly and painful looking brand on his arm.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





