Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Ivan's first Mock draft.


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,045
  • Reputation: 2,742
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:13 PM

After the combine. This is what I could see happening. Not going flashy like some of you. Keeping it simple with text.


1. Lane Johnson, OT
2. Jessie Williams, DT
3. Nothing.
4. Phillip Thomas, S
5. Caleb Sturgis, K
6. Kenny Okoro, CB
6. Hugh Thornton, G

#2 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • Joined: 04-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,491
  • Reputation: 190
  • LocationSouthern California
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:14 PM

I could dig it.

#3 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,326
  • Reputation: 1,844
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:06 PM

Ditto.

#4 Growl

Growl

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,697
  • Reputation: 4,099
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:11 PM

I've been aboard the Johnson bandwagon as long as anybody but the laughable notion that taking anything other than a lineman is "flashy" is downright nonsensical and outdated its almost comical to see people use it at this point.

I'm not directing this specifically at the OP, but I see a lot of people take this hollow soapbox whenever they feel we should take a lineman like "PSH! You stupid madden players just want your confoundit flahy receivers and junk? Me. I'm real knowledgable and mature and stuff because I'd rather take guys like Warmack who may not actually help us anymore than a similar guy in the 4th, but at least we don't have to face the frightening possibility that he may bust! I just am too scared to handle such a concept!"


Taking a talented prospect at a position of need isn't flashy. It's called being a well run organization.

#5 IamSoClutch

IamSoClutch

    CaptainCam

  • Joined: 16-January 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,398
  • Reputation: 664
  • LocationKinston, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:32 PM

Kicker shouldn't come before CB and G

#6 Panthersguru14

Panthersguru14

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 15-September 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 386
  • Reputation: 33
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:44 PM

Agree kicker should be later

#7 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,326
  • Reputation: 1,844
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:01 PM

Top kickers usually start getting taken around the 5th. I want a top kicker so we can stop playing musical chairs at the position for a while. Having a starting kicker locked up for the next 15 or so years is a lot more valuable than hoping for a stud like Hardy but more likely getting a third stringer or camp body.

#8 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • Joined: 12-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,050
  • Reputation: 139
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:01 PM

Johnson and Thomas wont be there.

Not realistic imo

#9 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,045
  • Reputation: 2,742
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 12:20 AM

I've been aboard the Johnson bandwagon as long as anybody but the laughable notion that taking anything other than a lineman is "flashy" is downright nonsensical and outdated its almost comical to see people use it at this point.

I'm not directing this specifically at the OP, but I see a lot of people take this hollow soapbox whenever they feel we should take a lineman like "PSH! You stupid madden players just want your confoundit flahy receivers and junk? Me. I'm real knowledgable and mature and stuff because I'd rather take guys like Warmack who may not actually help us anymore than a similar guy in the 4th, but at least we don't have to face the frightening possibility that he may bust! I just am too scared to handle such a concept!"


Taking a talented prospect at a position of need isn't flashy. It's called being a well run organization.


LOL growl. I meant that I'm not putting pics and videos. I do get your point though.

#10 Swaggasaurus

Swaggasaurus

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 25-April 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,862
  • Reputation: 465
  • LocationWilkesboro
HUDDLER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 01:25 AM

Johnson and Thomas wont be there.

Not realistic imo

I could see them both being there, probably not, but maybe. Thomas has cooled off some...not that hot right now. Lane Johnson will be there if the Bolts do not take him.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users