Jump to content


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Still prochoice for late-term abortions?

Recommended Posts

By the way...I think the fetus murders were an afterthought once the investigation opened on the adult female's death. And CWG can go f himself.

And by the way...


This is why some might find it necessary to make sure these sort of butchers have admitting priveleges. This butcher would not have been in business as long.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

A- because of what I bolded... they shouldn't legislate (early term) abortion either way. Don't outlaw it and don't fund it.

B- it should be a personal choice and since it is, that person should have to deal with the entirety of making that choice. Get pregnant and don't want to have the baby, you make the decision to get an abortion, you pay for it, and you deal with the consequences.

Whether you like it or not, the gov't does legislate morality. It is immoral to kill someone, so it's illegal. It's immoral to steal, so it's illegal. To some, aborting a 2 day old fetus is murder. To some others, aborting a fetus that's 8.9 months is perfectly fine... the gov't has the job to decided where that line is. If not the gov't then who?

This is the beginning of an interesting conversation...not so much over the net though.

I don't think the government should legislate morality. It should be illegal to murder because it violates another persons rights. It should be illegal to rape because it violates someone else's rights. Etc etc.

Morality is in the eye of the beholder.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The definition of an abortion, according to Merriam-Webster, among others, is "the deliberate termination of a pregnancy."

By definition, the thread title is completely false and inflammatory as it relates to abortion since this is not what took place in this particular case. The article clearly states "after they were born alive," so I'm failing to see how this is anything but a capital murder case and has nothing to do with abortion.

If the babies were born alive, the pregnancy was not deliberately terminated.

If the babies were born alive, there is no longer a pregnancy to terminate.

"...after they were delivered..."

"...after they were born alive..."

This is a capital murder case, pretty simple to understand, and has nothing to do with abortion since it all took place post- childbirth.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sooo you think that the kids are old enough to be considered human and in turn murdered out of the womb but a child of the same age in the womb isn't "alive."

Seems legit.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Death penalty


for petes sake get the topic off abortion

but the poster who said this is murder is most correct

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

And partial birth abortions were murder as well...just certain doctors had the thought that as long as the baby didn't travel x amount of inches...it was ok to jab something in the brain and scramble them before the finishing of delivery.

But the public never really referred to partial birth abortions as murder. But nothing will ever happen with a president that was the only person in the Illinois senate to vote for a bill to allow people like Kermit to kill a baby that survived the procedure that normally causes death in the fetus.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
    • Most Online

    Newest Member
  • Topics