Jump to content





Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

Still prochoice for late-term abortions?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
73 replies to this topic

#37 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,268
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:06 PM

By the way...I think the fetus murders were an afterthought once the investigation opened on the adult female's death. And CWG can go f himself.

And by the way...

http://www.slate.com..._the_women.html

This is why some might find it necessary to make sure these sort of butchers have admitting priveleges. This butcher would not have been in business as long.

#38 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,714
  • Reputation: 6,838
Moderators

Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:09 PM

If guns were illegal Adam Lanza wouldn't have murdered school children

#39 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,268
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:09 PM

And Planned Parenthood knew about this clinic.

http://www.delcotime...iewmode=default

The Slate article is pretty damning how abortion political pressure kept this a-hole open for far too long.

#40 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,268
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:10 PM

If guns were illegal Adam Lanza wouldn't have murdered school children


Right...Lanza was completely sane with or without guns.

http://www.huffingto..._n_2901377.html

#41 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 25,714
  • Reputation: 6,838
Moderators

Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:14 PM

So this doctor was sane?

#42 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,854
  • Reputation: 4,612
Administrators

Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:14 PM

thanks kurbie.

Wat?

#43 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,268
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:18 PM

So this doctor was sane?


You know what you call a D-student from med school don't you?

#44 Cat

Cat

    Terminally bored

  • Joined: 20-May 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,051
  • Reputation: 1,484
HUDDLER

Posted 22 March 2013 - 09:08 AM

A- because of what I bolded... they shouldn't legislate (early term) abortion either way. Don't outlaw it and don't fund it.

B- it should be a personal choice and since it is, that person should have to deal with the entirety of making that choice. Get pregnant and don't want to have the baby, you make the decision to get an abortion, you pay for it, and you deal with the consequences.


Whether you like it or not, the gov't does legislate morality. It is immoral to kill someone, so it's illegal. It's immoral to steal, so it's illegal. To some, aborting a 2 day old fetus is murder. To some others, aborting a fetus that's 8.9 months is perfectly fine... the gov't has the job to decided where that line is. If not the gov't then who?


This is the beginning of an interesting conversation...not so much over the net though.
I don't think the government should legislate morality. It should be illegal to murder because it violates another persons rights. It should be illegal to rape because it violates someone else's rights. Etc etc.
Morality is in the eye of the beholder.

#45 Anybodyhome

Anybodyhome

    USN Retired

  • Joined: 07-July 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,890
  • Reputation: 2,638
HUDDLER

Posted 23 March 2013 - 08:50 AM

The definition of an abortion, according to Merriam-Webster, among others, is "the deliberate termination of a pregnancy."

By definition, the thread title is completely false and inflammatory as it relates to abortion since this is not what took place in this particular case. The article clearly states "after they were born alive," so I'm failing to see how this is anything but a capital murder case and has nothing to do with abortion.
If the babies were born alive, the pregnancy was not deliberately terminated.
If the babies were born alive, there is no longer a pregnancy to terminate.

"...after they were delivered..."
"...after they were born alive..."

This is a capital murder case, pretty simple to understand, and has nothing to do with abortion since it all took place post- childbirth.

#46 Growl

Growl

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,309
  • Reputation: 4,455
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:45 PM

Sooo you think that the kids are old enough to be considered human and in turn murdered out of the womb but a child of the same age in the womb isn't "alive."



Seems legit.



lol.

#47 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,033
  • Reputation: 2,873
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 11:21 PM

Death penalty
Guns

for petes sake get the topic off abortion

but the poster who said this is murder is most correct

#48 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,268
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 07:23 AM

And partial birth abortions were murder as well...just certain doctors had the thought that as long as the baby didn't travel x amount of inches...it was ok to jab something in the brain and scramble them before the finishing of delivery.

But the public never really referred to partial birth abortions as murder. But nothing will ever happen with a president that was the only person in the Illinois senate to vote for a bill to allow people like Kermit to kill a baby that survived the procedure that normally causes death in the fetus.