Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

toldozer

Full 32 team mock

48 posts in this topic

Also traded stew for the 88th pick, eventhough thats not realistic.

Wow, dumb move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cyprien is the pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go with Cyprien at 21....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking cyprien then slay in the second

or hopkins elam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, dumb move.

Not really, put my self in position to draft lattimore in the fourth.

Williams tolbert are more then effective

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really, put my self in position to draft lattimore in the fourth.

Williams tolbert are more then effective

Lattimore has a busted knee and likely will start out on the PUP list or be on IR for all of 2013.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go Cyprien, then WR in the second. Maybe a guy like Blidi Wreh-Wilson falls to the third, or you could make the risky pick and take D.J. Hayden who has all the talent in the world but had a serious injury scare several months ago....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you still picking at 21? If so Cyprien, Hopkins, Richardson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Austin would be a value at 21

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is the off-season and winning online competitions is kinda our thing.   Let's see if we can't swing this thing.  The Pats need to go home.  We must fight the Evil League of Evil coalition. 
    •   So are you upset that Hillary lost and we stopped investigating her?  Or that in an alternate reality, Hillary won and no one is talking about Russia?  I'm trying to see your point, but alas, you might be too clever for me. Or are we back to it's not fair to expect Trump NOT to have Russian ties because of business interests?  Again, all Trump had to do was completely break from his companies, and he did not.  And we're seeing some serious Russian interests in Trump winning, and a lot of contact between Trump's campaign officials and advisers, which is good or bad? I'm not sure the point you're trying to make.  Is it "yay, Trump won so we can investigate Russian interference with the election and administration!"  Or is it "Boo, if Hillary won she wouldn't be investigated!" Hillary lost.  People came out for Trump in the rust belt. Now that people are looking at Trump, what he's said, what laws he's trying to pass, etc; a lot of information is coming out.  Is that bad?  Or is it just that the media is being unfair to Trump? Maybe I'm just not smart enough to get it.
    • I highly doubt this will upset anyone, unless they are trolling that is.