Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Trading Down in the second.


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#1 PantherBrew

PantherBrew

    Educated White Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,048 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 05:54 AM

It would be one of my first options.

Maybe one of those QB hungry teams would give us their 2nd, 3rd and 6th to move up to grab one of the falling QBs.

With the tremendous value of Star in the first, I believe it affords us the ability to trade down.

That unless one of your top players is still on the top board.

Thoughts? What would it take for you to move down in the 2nd?

#2 Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Leeroy Jenkins PhD

    HCIC

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,969 posts
  • LocationHouston Texas

Posted 26 April 2013 - 07:44 AM

I mean don't get me wrong, if a deal comes along like a 2nd, 3rd, and 6th!! But thats a little far fetched. We are not the Patriots.

We are right on the bubble of starter-backup talent level at pick 12 in the second.

#3 Catalyst

Catalyst

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,107 posts
  • LocationMorehead City

Posted 26 April 2013 - 07:46 AM

Judging from what Gettleman said about trading down in last night's press conference, I'd be very surprised if we did.

#4 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,214 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 07:47 AM

I mean don't get me wrong, if a deal comes along like a 2nd, 3rd, and 6th!! But thats a little far fetched. We are not the Patriots.

We are right on the bubble of starter-backup talent level at pick 12 in the second.


No we aren't, there are plenty of starting caliber players left in this Draft. You take Hunter/Wheaton/Allen in the second, and Sharmarko Thomas/Shawn Williams in the fourth and you've got three starters....

#5 panther4life

panther4life

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,654 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 07:48 AM

No we aren't, there are plenty of starting caliber players left in this Draft. You take Hunter/Wheaton/Allen in the second, and Sharmarko Thomas/Shawn Williams in the fourth and you've got three starters....


There could not possibly be a better result to this draft IMO if we came out of it with Star,Allen and Shamarko.

#6 Creep59

Creep59

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 587 posts
  • LocationHatteras Canyon

Posted 26 April 2013 - 07:50 AM

At this point I just want a good o lineman and Ill be satisfied.

#7 BuckNaked

BuckNaked

    Junior Member

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 07:51 AM

It would be one of my first options.

Maybe one of those QB hungry teams would give us their 2nd, 3rd and 6th to move up to grab one of the falling QBs.

With the tremendous value of Star in the first, I believe it affords us the ability to trade down.

That unless one of your top players is still on the top board.

Thoughts? What would it take for you to move down in the 2nd?



No qb hungry team picks after us in the second. How would they give us their second if they have already picked?

#8 Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Leeroy Jenkins PhD

    HCIC

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,969 posts
  • LocationHouston Texas

Posted 26 April 2013 - 07:56 AM

No we aren't, there are plenty of starting caliber players left in this Draft. You take Hunter/Wheaton/Allen in the second, and Sharmarko Thomas/Shawn Williams in the fourth and you've got three starters....


Usually the top 50 players in the draft are considered your starter caliber players. Maybe this draft is deeper than most, but traditionally mid-way through the second, that is the thought of it

#9 PantherBrew

PantherBrew

    Educated White Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,048 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 07:58 AM

No qb hungry team picks after us in the second. How would they give us their second if they have already picked?


Good point.

#10 Second_Solution

Second_Solution

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 144 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 08:02 AM

If Hunter, Cyprien and Allen are all gone (unlikely) then I would be all for trading down to accumulate some picks.

#11 2jakefansinva

2jakefansinva

    Coach Jack Bolton

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,734 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 08:03 AM

We will not trade our pick because.............

another "Hogmolly" will be staring us in the kisser.@ 44

and we won't pass it up.


ps.......our GM keeps stating "I'd rather have a dollar than 3 dimes"

#12 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 08:08 AM

No we aren't, there are plenty of starting caliber players left in this Draft. You take Hunter/Wheaton/Allen in the second, and Sharmarko Thomas/Shawn Williams in the fourth and you've got three starters....


None of those WRs are a lock to start over Lafell.

#13 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,214 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 08:20 AM

None of those WRs are a lock to start over Lafell.


A slot WR is a starter in todays NFL. They would all be #3 on the depth chart and could play in the slot....

#14 PantherBrew

PantherBrew

    Educated White Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,048 posts

Posted 26 April 2013 - 08:21 AM

Still want Defense though.

I want a dominant Defense.

#15 panfan32

panfan32

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 587 posts
  • LocationFayetteville, North Carolina

Posted 26 April 2013 - 08:24 AM

At this point I just want a good o lineman and Ill be satisfied.



I would like to see a good OT OG and CB. After Tavon left no one else really impresses me at WR. I see nothing more than another Colbert type WR's left.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com