Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Takeo Spikes says Woodson could win us 3 games


  • Please log in to reply
66 replies to this topic

#1 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,632
  • Reputation: 995
  • Locationnear Charlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 05:59 AM

He was on NFL network stating we could win 3 more games if we had Woodson. I know at least one game we would have one if we would have had him.That play still makes me want to puke.



#2 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,654
  • Reputation: 6,637
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:16 AM

Off the top of my head I'd say Atl and Chicago...from last season.

#3 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,340
  • Reputation: 2,944
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:18 AM

Off the top of my head I'd say Atl and Chicago...from last season.

We'd have won the Bucs debacle also.



#4 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,958
MFCEO

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:20 AM

*
A WHOLE PIE!

Could also be titled "anyone but Nak" could have won us 3 games.



#5 PantherPhann89

PantherPhann89

    CPP "Carolina Panther Phann"

  • Joined: 25-June 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,485
  • Reputation: 409
  • LocationSC
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:21 AM

I agree with him...

#6 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,424
  • Reputation: 2,155
  • LocationAt the lake
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:26 AM

That assumes at 37 he would be the starter.  That is not assured at all.  He only started 7 games for the Packers last year.



#7 KillerKat

KillerKat

    To Hell With Bell

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,394
  • Reputation: 4,559
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:29 AM

That's because he broke his collar bone



#8 RelaxImaPro

RelaxImaPro

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 16-April 12
  • posts: 3,126
  • Reputation: 3,168
  • LocationThe Moon
SUPPORTER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:31 AM

I think I could have won us the ATL game.  Seriously... to this day whenever I see that replay I have no idea what in the fug Nakamura was trying to do.  It's like he just kinda'... fell backwards like he was going all John Woo/Matrix bullet time or some poo.

 

falcons.gif

 

 

Jesus, that's like the worst attempt at an interception I've ever seen, and he was in such an awesome position to make a play on the ball too.  Hell if anything just throw a goddamn hand up and swat that bastard away.



#9 Montie_0123

Montie_0123

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 779
  • Reputation: 95
  • LocationCharlotte NC
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:35 AM

I would agree with that, a healthy Woodson definitely would help us. He might not have to speed anymore but the fact that he knows how to watch film his instincts and experience will have him in the right place to make plays.



#10 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,922
  • Reputation: 5,446
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:37 AM

I think I could have won us the ATL game.  Seriously... to this day whenever I see that replay I have no idea what in the fug Nakamura was trying to do.  It's like he just kinda'... fell backwards or something.

 

falcons.gif

 

 

Jesus, that's like the worst attempt at an interception I've ever seen, and he was in such an awesome position to make a play on the ball too.  Hell if anything just throw a goddamn hand up and swat that bastard away.

To be fair (and yes Nak sucked that day and all season)....but Norman was so out of position and beaten on the play that it was just pathetic.

 

He was as much to blame as Nak.



#11 RelaxImaPro

RelaxImaPro

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 16-April 12
  • posts: 3,126
  • Reputation: 3,168
  • LocationThe Moon
SUPPORTER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:41 AM

To be fair (and yes Nak sucked that day and all season)....but Norman was so out of position and beaten on the play that it was just pathetic.

 

He was as much to blame as Nak.

 

Oh yeah, I was going to mention Norman as well but figured I'd just stick with Naka since he was the one who actually attempted to make a move on the ball.

 

But yeah like you said... no excuses for how far off of Roddy Norman was.  Even worse it looks like he's kind of got a lackadaisical jog going on in that gif like he isn't even attempting to catch back up with White.  I just think it's sad that as good of position that Nakamura was in he fuged up as bad as he did... he literally just has to throw a hand up and bam, no play.  Who knows, we might've gotten a safety or something on the next set of downs with how balls-to-the-wall our pass rush was that day.



#12 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,958
MFCEO

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:41 AM

To be fair (and yes Nak sucked that day and all season)....but Norman was so out of position and beaten on the play that it was just pathetic.

 

 

Norman went for the double move. One could argue thats an ok  risk to take because he knew he had help from Nak deep.



#13 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,922
  • Reputation: 5,446
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:42 AM

Oh yeah, I was going to mention Norman as well but figured I'd just stick with Naka since he was the one who actually attempted to make a move on the ball.

 

But yeah like you said... no excuses for how far off the ball Norman was.  Even worse it looks like he's kind of got a lackadaisical jog going on in that gif like he isn't even attempting to catch back up with White.

 

Norman was beaten by almost 10 yards on that play.

 

He was the main reason....Nak just could not get there over the top.



#14 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,922
  • Reputation: 5,446
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:43 AM

Norman went for the double move. One could argue thats an ok  risk to take because he knew he had help from Nak deep.

 

Valid point.

 

But, there is a difference in biting on the double move.....and swallowing the the move hook, line, and sinker.

 

Norman was flat out juked and abused on that play.

 

Hope the benching late in the season wakes that boy up.



#15 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,632
  • Reputation: 995
  • Locationnear Charlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 17 May 2013 - 06:46 AM

Norman went for the double move. One could argue thats an ok  risk to take because he knew he had help from Nak deep.

Yea but he should have known that Nak sucks.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users