Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jtnc

Cam wants a run game

181 posts in this topic

1st point/Paragraph) Rivera's not a big time coach. So what makes you think that Gettleman doesn't have influence over Rivera, especially when Ronnie was on the hot seat last year, when most observers felt he should have lost his job?? Rivera has no express power in this relationship. He's a collaborator at best. That's where the smart $$ is. 

 

2) No, the De-Emphasis of the Read Option, actually started around the middle of the season, when Hurney got fired and Rivera knew his job was on the line, and needed to do something to save it. This was directly expressed by Rivera in a NFL.com article by Albert Breer earlier this year. 

 

I'm sure when Gettleman came in and saw the film (with or with out Rivera and Shula's input), he reinforced the less Read Option notion. And if you watch NY Giants games, it's pretty obvious why. Cam and Eli really do have a lot in common as far as how they throw the ball (excellent, rugged, upright, downfield throwers, who can be inconsistent in the short and intermediate game, who eventually get hot again and make some outstanding throws, plays and drives after). When Gettleman see's Cam, I'm sure he sees Eli as well.  And Cam is way ahead of where Eli was his first 2 years. Makes sense?

 

The reason why many talk about Gettleman vs Rivera the way we do is for three simple reasons:

 

1) Most strong General Managers have Direct input of Coaching Philosophy, Player Direction, and the type of team they will implement. That's no secret.  

 

2) More importantly: Rivera is a weak coach, in no position to dictate to or ignore Gettleman if he knows what's good for him. Rivera's is/has been on the hot seat, and will continue to be, unless his team makes the playoffs, or misses out with a winning record. And the Panthers need that now. You essentially had a team last year, with a inexperienced 2nd year HC, an inexperienced, hard headed 2nd year OC, and a non football GM. Where were the grown ups to over see the children?

 

3) Gettleman, has been around football as long/longer than Rivera. And he came highly recommended--as the GM by Ernie Accorsi, Richardson's GM consultant. Who do you think Richardson trust, believes more at this stage? And if you think it's Rivera, please tell me why with his track record of admitted futility, poor management and in-experienced coaching moves so far?

 

 

 

 

This is Gettleman 1st year as a GM he still has to prove  that he was the right hire...( I believe he will be good GM so far he has done a good job...but wait at least couple of years!)  Second if he was so good why wasn't he hired as GM longtime ago.

 

you say all that about Rivera then why did Richardson keep Rivera in first place instead of   letting his Highly regarded  GM that has godly knowledge of football than anyone else hire his own coach that would be better than  this inexperienced coach......

 

Teams are successful in the NFL by players 1st, Coaches, 2nd and then ....GM ............ New York giants (couch Coughlin)

San-Fransico - (jim harbaugh) - Ravens- ( John Harbaugh), Seattle -(Pete Carroll), Steelers - (Mike Tomplin), Saints -(Sean Peyton), Patriots - (Belichick)  Atlanta - (Mike Smith), Houston - (Gary Kubiak) ...and on on

 

These team do have good GM but the point of the GM is to bring in the necessary players and keep financial stability  and place the team in position to be successful ........It always comes down to coaches and players 

 

He is not big time coach right now because he was never truly placed in position to do so........i think you hatred for Rivera and ego is coming in the way.........but you'll find out how good of coach he is ..........how bout  ban from the forum for life! if i'm right after this season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is Gettleman 1st year as a GM he still has to prove  that he was the right hire...( I believe he will be good GM so far he has done a good job...but wait at least couple of years!)  Second if he was so good why wasn't he hired as GM longtime ago.

 

you say all that about Rivera then why did Richardson keep Rivera in first place instead of   letting his Highly regarded  GM that has godly knowledge of football than anyone else hire his own coach that would be better than  this inexperienced coach......

 

Teams are successful in the NFL by players 1st, Coaches, 2nd and then ....GM ............ New York giants (couch Coughlin)

San-Fransico - (jim harbaugh) - Ravens- ( John Harbaugh), Seattle -(Pete Carroll), Steelers - (Mike Tomplin), Saints -(Sean Peyton), Patriots - (Belichick)  Atlanta - (Mike Smith), Houston - (Gary Kubiak) ...and on on

 

These team do have good GM but the point of the GM is to bring in the necessary players and keep financial stability  and place the team in position to be successful ........It always comes down to coaches and players 

 

He is not big time coach right now because he was never truly placed in position to do so........i think you hatred for Rivera and ego is coming in the way.........but you'll find out how good of coach he is ..........how bout  ban from the forum for life! if i'm right after this season.

 

1) Unfortunately, most of what you wrote was indecipherable. 

2) Gettleman may be 'unproven' as you say. But that's better than being bad in so many areas, which Rivera has already shown/proven in so many instances. At this stage/unlike Rivera, Gettleman has a clean slate. 

 

Gettleman wasn't hired previously, because he didn't market himself like other GM's.He's Ole Skool, and has said as much publicly and to the Giants, when he removed himself from GM consideration several years ago. However, what you should be asking yourself is: Why was he hired over so many other young hot shots after the season?

3) You ask "why did Richardson keep Rivera", etc. I ask, why did he let him twist in the wind, if he was such a good, deserving coach? No owner would ever place a respected, deserving coach through that. 

 

The irony is: You're making my argument for me regarding coaches vs GM's, players. 

 

The Ravens, Seattle, The Steelers, Patriots, Atlanta and the Giants, are all known for having hired excellent General Managers, and/or having excellent longtime team organization and management. You could have said the same about San Francisco up until a few years ago.  The great organizations always come from the top down, not vice versa. 

 

4) I don't hate Rivera at all. I just don't think he's been terribly un-impressive in some critical areas, which has cost the Panthers games his first two years. That's a fact.  More importantly, It doesn't matter what I think. Rivera was on the hot seat last year, and therefore is in no position to dictate to the New General Manager? Why is that so hard to understand?

 

Rivera, is currently nobody in the NFL's eyes, until proven otherwise. That's the nature of the business, not what I think.

 

Nonetheless, I hope he gets better, learned his lessons, and has a great year. We're all counting on it/him!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Unfortunately, most of what you wrote was indecipherable. 

2) Gettleman may be 'unproven' as you say. But that's better than being bad in so many areas, which Rivera has already shown/proven in so many instances.

 

Gettleman wasn't hired previously, because he didn't market himself like other GM's.He's Ole Skool, and has spoken about this. However, what you should be asking yourself is: Why was he hired over so many other young hot shots?

3) You ask "why did Richardson keep Rivera", etc. I ask, why did he let him twist in the wind, if he was such a good, deserving coach? No owner would ever place a respected, deserving coach through that. 

 

The irony is: You're making my argument for me regarding coaches vs GM's, players. 

 

The Ravens, Seattle, The Steelers, Patriots, Atlanta and the Giants, are all known for having hired excellent General Managers, and/or having excellent longtime team organization and management. You could have said the same about San Francisco up until a few years ago.  The great organizations always come from the top down, not vice versa. 

 

4) I don't hate Rivera at all. I just don't think he's been terribly un-impressive in some critical areas, which has cost the Panthers games. That's a fact.  More importantly: It doesn't matter what I think. Rivera was on the hot seat last year, and therefore is in no position to dictate to the New General Manager? Why is that so hard to understand?

 

Rivera, is currently nobody in the NFL's eyes, until proven otherwise. That's the nature of the business. Nonetheless, I hope he gets better, learned his lessons, and have a great year. 

 

Why did Richardson keep him maybe because he has faith in him that he can take them to the Playoffs then to the Superbowl why would he waste a year of time and keep him instead of letting his GM start his team the way he wanted to. Rivera isn't perfect but  he knows that if he could get a good GM that can place the team in good position  then RIvera will be a successful coach.

 

Gettleman wasn't hire because he is old school.....no he wasn't hired because  no team wanted him until Panthers came and picked him up.  

 

I didn't say he was dictating to the new GM....... i'm only saying  the our GM is not the driving force behind the coaching of the team.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did Richardson keep him maybe because he has faith in him that he can take them to the Playoffs then to the Superbowl why would he waste a year of time and keep him instead of letting his GM start his team the way he wanted to. Rivera isn't perfect but  he knows that if he could get a good GM that can place the team in good position  then RIvera will be a successful coach.

 

Gettleman wasn't hire because he is old school.....no he wasn't hired because  no team wanted him until Panthers came and picked him up.  

 

I didn't say he was dictating to the new GM....... i'm only saying  the our GM is not the driving force behind the coaching of the team.

Bottom Line: Richardson made Rivera twist in the wind, and have every reporter speculate on him getting fired. Good, respected coaches don't go through that, if their owners had the "faith" in them  you're saying JR had for Rivera. One could argue, that Richardson was just being 'Cheap', and didn't want to pay two coaches (or he wasn't sure of RR's fate). Why is this so hard to understand?

 

You obviously don't know Gettleman's GM background and story. So I'll leave it there, if his background/history was lost on you. 

 

I'm saying Rivera, CAN'T DICTATE TO THE GM, and if anything, it's the GM dictating to him. And at best (for Rivera) he's a collaborator, with Gettleman having the final say, as DG has said prevously!

 

The direction of the team, expressly affects the coaching. Plus, if Gettleman sees something he doesn't like during a game or film, he will discuss it with Rivera, and possibly give suggestions. That's his job. 

 

I think you were too used to Marty Hurney being GM, instead of a no nonsense GM with a coaching and player personell background (in successful organizations to boot), as Gettleman. 

 

What do you think a Good General Manager does? Plus, Gettleman's not the one on the hot seat. Rivera is (until proven otherwise). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bottom line is Richardson kept Rivera even with 2 losing season!!!!!!!!!! and didn't let his new GM pick out his own head coach.....yes of course Gettleman is going to give advice and vice versa  but the bottom line is that  coaching is going to be left to Rivera!!!!!!!!!!!!!  

 

I think being cheap wasn't the reason ........if Richardson believed that he wasn't a good coach and would have a another losing season which would equal to less revenue (tickets, Merchandise,..etc) for the team = less money for Richardson......... he would have hired a new coach. 

 

No i'm not used to Hurney....i like Gettleman as the GM and he will do a good job but I also believe that RIvera is a good coach and will be one of the up and coming coach that you will be riding the bandwagon halfway through the season............ don't go to hiding when where in week 8 :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1st point/Paragraph) Rivera's not a big time coach. So what makes you think that Gettleman doesn't have influence over Rivera, especially when Ronnie was on the hot seat last year, when most observers felt he should have lost his job?? Rivera has no express power in this relationship. He's a collaborator at best. That's where the smart $$ is.

2) No, the De-Emphasis of the Read Option, actually started around the middle of the season, when Hurney got fired and Rivera knew his job was on the line, and needed to do something to save it. This was directly expressed by Rivera in a NFL.com article by Albert Breer earlier this year.

I'm sure when Gettleman came in and saw the film (with or with out Rivera and Shula's input), he reinforced the less Read Option notion. And if you watch NY Giants games, it's pretty obvious why. Cam and Eli really do have a lot in common as far as how they throw the ball (excellent, rugged, upright, downfield throwers, who can be inconsistent in the short and intermediate game, who eventually get hot again and make some outstanding throws, plays and drives after). When Gettleman see's Cam, I'm sure he sees Eli as well. And Cam is way ahead of where Eli was his first 2 years. Makes sense?

The reason why many talk about Gettleman vs Rivera the way we do is for three simple reasons:

1) Most strong General Managers have Direct input of Coaching Philosophy, Player Direction, and the type of team they will implement. That's no secret.

2) More importantly: Rivera is a weak coach, in no position to dictate to or ignore Gettleman if he knows what's good for him. Rivera's is/has been on the hot seat, and will continue to be, unless his team makes the playoffs, or misses out with a winning record. And the Panthers need that now. You essentially had a team last year, with a inexperienced 2nd year HC, an inexperienced, hard headed 2nd year OC, and a non football GM. Where were the grown ups to over see the children?

3) Gettleman, has been around football as long/longer than Rivera. And he came highly recommended--as the GM by Ernie Accorsi, Richardson's GM consultant. Who do you think Richardson trust, believes more at this stage? And if you think it's Rivera, please tell me why with his track record of admitted futility, poor management and in-experienced coaching moves so far?

1. Belichick wasn't a big time coach either 2 years in. I think people are too tough on Rivera....he admits he is learning. Dude knows his X's and O's.....and I wouldn't give Gettlemen an edge on that stuff.

2. Rivera has to worry about pleasing Richardson....more so than Gettlemen. Big Cat makes the calls here....our history backs that.

3. If the Big Cat trusted our old first time GM as much as some imply.....he would have allowed him come in here and build his team. He didn't. JR made the call on the Rivera/Cam era and basically told Gettlemen to deal with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Unfortunately, most of what you wrote was indecipherable.

2) Gettleman may be 'unproven' as you say. But that's better than being bad in so many areas, which Rivera has already shown/proven in so many instances. At this stage/unlike Rivera, Gettleman has a clean slate.

Gettleman wasn't hired previously, because he didn't market himself like other GM's.He's Ole Skool, and has said as much publicly and to the Giants, when he removed himself from GM consideration several years ago. However, what you should be asking yourself is: Why was he hired over so many other young hot shots after the season?

3) You ask "why did Richardson keep Rivera", etc. I ask, why did he let him twist in the wind, if he was such a good, deserving coach? No owner would ever place a respected, deserving coach through that.

The irony is: You're making my argument for me regarding coaches vs GM's, players.

The Ravens, Seattle, The Steelers, Patriots, Atlanta and the Giants, are all known for having hired excellent General Managers, and/or having excellent longtime team organization and management. You could have said the same about San Francisco up until a few years ago. The great organizations always come from the top down, not vice versa.

4) I don't hate Rivera at all. I just don't think he's been terribly un-impressive in some critical areas, which has cost the Panthers games his first two years. That's a fact. More importantly, It doesn't matter what I think. Rivera was on the hot seat last year, and therefore is in no position to dictate to the New General Manager? Why is that so hard to understand?

Rivera, is currently nobody in the NFL's eyes, until proven otherwise. That's the nature of the business, not what I think.

Nonetheless, I hope he gets better, learned his lessons, and has a great year. We're all counting on it/him!

Talent has cost Rivera many games....coaching a few.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Inquiring minds would like to know why it took 10 freaking games(8 of which we lost) to figure out that we needed to "change" something.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to play.

There have been numerous examples through history of coaches being told to play, or not play, certain players. So I would think coaches are third in line of succession.

JR wanted to make the best choice possible where it came to GM. But the Rivera situation had to be dealt with before he made that decision. After JR sat down with Rivera, he came away impressed that Rivera was still the man for the job.

Nobody knows, or knew, Gettlemens' career plains before he got here. He very well may have been happy with what he was doing. And when JR came calling he decided it was time to take the plunge.

Lastly, I am a firm believer that as long as there is growth, you have to give your coach that third year. Especially with the mess Rivera inherited. I personally think he has done a really good job. And if he stays true to his roots, with Gettlemens' help, he is going to be a very good HC. And I can live with that.

Ok, thanks for listening. Carry on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to play.

There have been numerous examples through history of coaches being told to play, or not play, certain players. So I would think coaches are third in line of succession.

JR wanted to make the best choice possible where it came to GM. But the Rivera situation had to be dealt with before he made that decision. After JR sat down with Rivera, he came away impressed that Rivera was still the man for the job.

Nobody knows, or knew, Gettlemens' career plains before he got here. He very well may have been happy with what he was doing. And when JR came calling he decided it was time to take the plunge.

Lastly, I am a firm believer that as long as there is growth, you have to give your coach that third year. Especially with the mess Rivera inherited. I personally think he has done a really good job. And if he stays true to his roots, with Gettlemens' help, he is going to be a very good HC. And I can live with that.

Ok, thanks for listening. Carry on.

Name a GM that isn't an owner that has done it....if there are so many numerous examples of GMs acting as coaches. Coaches are 3rd in line for what? The playcalls on the field?

The Rivera decision didnt have to be made before Gettlemen was hired. That is why the Big Cat was criticized for it. That is suppose to be a GM's job normally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    •     Now don't take this the wrong way, but....are you two nuts? Now, if the kid didn't have those injury issues, maybe I can get on board. But man, those petite WRs with injury issues in college? Those guys scare the living poo outta me.   Now get me a Ross clone and I'm on board. Someone for the slot that could actually, you know, scare a Defense. Now that would tickle my giddy like nobodies bidness.
    • IMO, it is obvious, to me anyhow, that the kid has matured. He has taken heat for standing up for what he believes, and has done it the right way. No snarky comments to the press. Keeping his head down, and working toward a goal. He has brought to light injustices not only in our country, but in others as well. His foundation just contributed over a million and a half dollars to the Simolian relief effort.   All that is admirable to be sure. And he can play football as well, or better, than enough QBs to earn himself a shot at a job.   It is not the football side of his life that is keeping him off teams. Almost every team hates distractions. It is just how it is. And Kaep is a walking distraction at this point in time.   I would like to add that another thought could be that at this point in FA, no one is being signed. OK, maybe a better way to put that is, FA spending has slowed considerably.   If teams head to Training Camp and he is still unemployed. Then I may start believing in conspiracies.
    • lol lol lol fahey watched every snap of every game and graded the quarterbacks as he saw it. kaepernick is a fine game manager who was let down repeatedly by perhaps the shittiest set of skill position players in the league and oh yeah he can run like the wind. you've got to be pretty stupid to think this is anything but a quarterback starved league blackballing a serviceable quarterback all because he had the audamndacity to protest racism in america and tbh i've not seen one post itt that would cause me to even begin to question that.