Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Andrew Luck the 23rd ranked player in the nfl?

147 posts in this topic

Posted

LOL did you watch him? He should have been top 20 man. He's a stud.

Cam should also have been close to top 20

I watched every frickin' snap. The kid is absurdly overrated. I don't give a flying f*ck what anyone thinks about it because they don't know what the hell they're talking about. He was barely the 23rd best quarterback, but everyone finds his numbers so appealing without the context of an absurd number of snaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Bottom line.............Win games and get in the tournament

"stats are for losers"

So why wasn't Joe Flacco ranked higher?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Took his team to the playoffs?

Went 11-5 with subpar talent around him?

Broke Cam's record for passing yards by a rookie?

I love Cam but until he starts winning games he will not get the respect that his talent deserves. It's sad but true. People want him to be this and that but ultimately all he needs is W's. Had Cam followed up his record setting rookie year with 11 wins, a playoff birth, and the exact same stats he had last year, he would be on the cover of every magazine and would be ESPN's new "it" guy.

Is it all Cam's fault? No. Some of it? Yes (two loses directly resulted in a play of his).

If Cam had a better coach I think this wouldn't even be an issue. But that may not happen for a while. So sit back and enjoy it bc until those last minute losses turn into wins this is going to continue to happen.

When "Cam starts winning games"? I think you mean when the "Carolina Panthers" start winning games.

It was the "Indianapolis Colts" who won 11 games not "Andrew Luck".

Let's not forget they promptly exited the playoffs behind Lucks 0 TD 1 INT 1 FUM and 59.8 QB rating performance.

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So why wasn't Joe Flacco ranked higher?

. Because logic is a foreign concept to Luck-lovers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Take away the guys name and he is probably not even in the top 100. Bottom line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Took his team to the playoffs?

 

Went 11-5 with subpar talent around him?

 

Broke Cam's record for passing yards by a rookie?

 

 

Threw how many picks? 

 

Had a lower rating than Blaine Gabbert?

 

Had the Coach of the Year and a very underrated defense and O-Line?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

No way he had a lower rating then gabby?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If Cam threw as many times luck did his rookie Season, Cam would've had 5,000 yards.

 

That's not even homerisim. That's like just comparing stats.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Gabbert had a rating of 77.4 but only played in 10 games.

Luck had a rating of 76.5 and played all 16 games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

lol @ made up rankings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So why wasn't Joe Flacco ranked higher?

 

No offense but, I don't know and don't care.

 

You think Raven fans are talking about stats?

 

"just win baby"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Ravens fans don't give a fug because they actually have a stable front office and coaching regime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites