Prepare to get yalls panties all wadded up
Jump to content
Posted 14 June 2013 - 04:52 PM
The f*ck is wrong with that place man. It doesn't even have to do with the fact that they would pick Peterson over Cam Newton, but a comparison in that fashion is just a f*cking joke.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 04:55 PM
Posted 14 June 2013 - 04:59 PM
This isn't an analysis piece, it's an Adam Rank (herp derp, I'M DER FUNNYST GUY EVR!) fluff piece that the NFL deems fit to peddle. I actually prefer that he picked AP in that context.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 05:02 PM
Cam - "Ability to not open his eyes in a press conference after his team loses"
AP - "Able to recover from a devastating injury in record time. In other words, he's practically bulletproof."
Gee, I wonder what his intentions were in this award worthy piece of rhetorical art?
Posted 14 June 2013 - 05:07 PM
yea that bottom poo is fugging awful, take away any achievements Cam has done. I have no clue what it will take from him to get the respect he deserves
Posted 14 June 2013 - 05:08 PM
It's actually funny if you try not to read into it. It is the offseason.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 05:11 PM
Peterson. The NFL was coming off a lockout when Newton first showed up, so the slight edge goes to Peterson.
Hum how many rookie rb's have done that or how many threw back-to-back 400 yard games. No comparison to me but whatever
Posted 14 June 2013 - 05:15 PM
Posted 14 June 2013 - 05:16 PM
Posted 14 June 2013 - 07:02 PM
Hey everyone lets talk about how the undisputed best running back in the NFL is better at his position than a 3rd year guy who sits in the 5-15 range at his position. Lets also include a bunch of physical measurables because most quarterbacks are just as athletic as running backs.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 07:55 PM
Mr. Rank should take a cue from the Jordan Gross podcasts and headline his articles with "This is Rank". That way, people won't be disappointed after reading.