Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

More fuel to the fire: Juror says Zimmerman got away with murder

107 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

By definition stalking is only if you follow someone more than one time legally he wasnt "stalking" him if he had followed him two days in a row that would have been stalking.


Shhhh don't use facts. He doesn't like it when you use facts to disrupt the narrative he's trying to sell.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yeah Richard Ramirez didn't follow people for 2 days, so he shouldn't be called the Night Stalker, he should be the Night Innocent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yeah Richard Ramirez didn't follow people for 2 days, so he shouldn't be called the Night Stalker, he should be the Night Innocent.


Right because the term the media gives a serial killer defiantly has so much to do with the legal definition of stalking he also set out with the intention to kill his victims something Zimmerman almost certainly did not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

By definition stalking is only if you follow someone more than one time legally he wasnt "stalking" him if he had followed him two days in a row that would have been stalking.

 

So from the 5 pages in this thread, this is all you care to address?

 

I don't give a shit about the legal definition. He was following the kid, and had absolutely no reason to. Other than racial profiling him clearly. Let's hear your justification for Martins death, care to give us your view?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

So from the 5 pages in this thread, this is all you care to address?

I don't give a poo about the legal definition. He was following the kid, and had absolutely no reason to. Other than racial profiling him clearly. Let's hear your justification for Martins death, care to give us your view?

you're a fucking racist just like our ignorant president.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

you're a fuging racist just like our ignorant president.

 

Wow.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

so since the cops didnt show up, he decided to go all out and follow an unarmed kid to the point that the kid felt threaten and hoped on his ass. again he profiled Trayvon as a thug, or somebody that is up to no good, like you did. but why?


There's every bit as much evidence for one scenario as there is for the other. The difference is how you and others consider your opinion to be a foregone conclusion irrespective of the lack of evidence.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

So from the 5 pages in this thread, this is all you care to address?

I don't give a poo about the legal definition. He was following the kid, and had absolutely no reason to. Other than racial profiling him clearly. Let's hear your justification for Martins death, care to give us your view?

His death was tragic, a life cut so short however all we can go on is the letter of the law and since neither you or anyone else can prove Zimmerman was racially profiling all you have is your opinion based on what you have seen on the news and you like so many others are reacting exactly how they want you to poor sheep being led to conclusions and not even realizing it this argument is exactly what they want so go ahead give it to them.

Also back to the thread topic the juror "Zimmerman got away with murder" we just can't prove it at all brilliant I tell you!!

Of course you don't care about legality if it was up the law isn't always about what happened its about what you can PROVE the cold hard truth is you can't prove Zimmerman"s intent anymore than the people who Martin was casing houses can prove it.


The law has spoken get over it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

sure zimmerman reacted to a black kid walking down the street at 7 pm with candy and a sugary drink by calling the police and following him with a gun, but how could you possibly know that he racially profiled martin? maybe he just really fucking hates skittles. did you ever think of that, liebruls?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

sure zimmerman reacted to a black kid walking down the street at 7 pm with candy and a sugary drink by calling the police and following him with a gun, but how could you possibly know that he racially profiled martin? maybe he just really fuging hates skittles. did you ever think of that, liebruls?


Hmmm he was carrying an Arizona watermelon drink and Skittles (two if the three ingredients to make codein) it would seem a bit more likely he was on a run to get ingredients to get high. Also did you know Zimmerman is a registered democrat and proud liberal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Hmmm he was carrying an Arizona watermelon drink and Skittles (two if the three ingredients to make codein) it would seem a bit more likely he was on a run to get ingredients to get high. Also did you know Zimmerman is a registered democrat and proud liberal?

 

Wat?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Wat?

I think he meant to say "lean" not "codeine".

Lean consists of Arizona, Skittles, and Codeine, and is known to cause aggression, and paranoia. Crazy huh? Such a coincidence it blows my fucking mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites