Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

L-Towns camp observations day 3


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
32 replies to this topic

#13 FattyFatFat

FattyFatFat

    Buddhist Monk

  • Joined: 29-July 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,851
  • Reputation: 801
HUDDLER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 03:03 PM

Makes me excited reading your post. Love that C-God is stepping up (definitely tread lightly around 89, right Ken Lucas?).

 

How's did the O-line look today? Does it look like we have any solid depth?



#14 MtnJax

MtnJax

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-August 11
  • posts: 1,429
  • Reputation: 700
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 03:04 PM

I think it was Norman who "mugged" Gettis. although all of the other tweets i saw just said that Gettis fell and Norman fell on top of him



#15 FootballMaestro

FootballMaestro

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-January 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,942
  • Reputation: 1,589
HUDDLER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 03:14 PM

Naw, it wasn't like that. DBs were working on jumping routes.
Gettis was streaking down the sideline. DA threw almost perfectly, but the ball seemed to hang forever. I think it was Norman, can't remember, jumped for the ball at the same time Gettis stretched for it. Gettis hit the ground. Norman landed on top of him.
Norman jumped up and called for a trainer.
I didn't see a horse collar. I saw two guys collide in the air, then again on the ground.

 

Ok; kool/thanks. 



#16 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,422
  • Reputation: 5,933
HUDDLER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 03:30 PM

Thanks for the Update LTown.

#17 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,769
  • Reputation: 3,761
HUDDLER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 03:50 PM

I'm liking what I've seen. This was one of the best practices I've ever been to. I have to say guys I'm probably more excited than I should be but I don't care. Far as Im concerned this team looks ready to make its move.

Anyway, this is just one mans opinion, I'm sure someone saw today completely different. Hope this is helpful.

 

The nice thing is that the opinions that we are reading are pretty much on one accord (at least from Huddle regulars).  There are a few inconsistencies about the Cameron kid at QB, but I'm more apt to believe Huddlers than others.

 

Like you, I realize that it's not quite rational to get overly excited by day 3, but I can't help but be excited by all the talk of KB on offense and KK on defense looking explosive; Godfrey, Klein and Florence being on the middle of the play;  AE, Adams and Ginn actually making some catches; and, not to mention a Brandon Williams sighting.  Moreover, you can't help but think that perhaps G-man was absolutely correct in his assertion that he can spot and bring in talent no matter the round (if a round at all) with the apparently great value picks in Barner, Klein and Lester.  Throw in the Gaydosh, Ginn and Blackburn in the midst of an already talented talented team and it appears that G-man knows how to put a team together. And, with the players already playing with attitude by day 3, you gotta feel that there is something going on behind the scenes: motivation powered by Rivera.

 

Let's hope that it continues.



#18 L-TownCat

L-TownCat

    Baptized In The Blood Of Saints

  • Joined: 27-June 11
  • posts: 6,590
  • Reputation: 4,762
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 04:54 PM

were they running mainly nickel packages or were they running with 4 dbs?

just trying to get a feel for tbe defense. we have such a great front 7 now, it would be a shame not totake advantage of it because we have to flood the field with DBs to compensate for lack of talent.


2 DBs and 2 S's. they had the true base d out there. They did run some nickel though.

#19 L-TownCat

L-TownCat

    Baptized In The Blood Of Saints

  • Joined: 27-June 11
  • posts: 6,590
  • Reputation: 4,762
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 04:58 PM

I think it was Norman who "mugged" Gettis. although all of the other tweets i saw just said that Gettis fell and Norman fell on top of him


That one happened right in front of me. There was a lot of contact and as Gettis tried to leap he was dragged down from behind. He still almost caught it too.

#20 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,647
  • Reputation: 8,122
Moderators

Posted 28 July 2013 - 05:02 PM

2 DBs and 2 S's. they had the true base d out there. They did run some nickel though.

that's what it's been sounding like. i really want to see our front seven on the field  but i also really don't  want to see our secondary hanging out there with just four guys. i just really dont trust the back four. i hope the pass rush is something special because a secondary like this is the type that gives up points and loses games.



#21 L-TownCat

L-TownCat

    Baptized In The Blood Of Saints

  • Joined: 27-June 11
  • posts: 6,590
  • Reputation: 4,762
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 05:06 PM

This early I expect base d. I know the nickel will be a secondary base defense because of all the 3 wide sets we will face. Not that worried though. TD, and Beas can cover in a pinch, we good man, we good.

#22 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 16-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,730
  • Reputation: 1,096
HUDDLER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 05:22 PM

If our rookie DTs can come in and play well than I think our defense will be fine. Heard some good things at the SS spot with Mitchell and Lester too

#23 panther4life

panther4life

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,655
  • Reputation: 1,181
HUDDLER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 06:09 PM

These types if threads are like crack.. I want more!

Nice write up

#24 TylerVagyler

TylerVagyler

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 02-January 11
  • posts: 2,589
  • Reputation: 892
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 July 2013 - 06:22 PM

how has bruce campbell looked?