Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Backfield speaks of "broken promises"...


  • Please log in to reply
65 replies to this topic

#11 Chaos

Chaos

    @chaos_cltsports

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • posts: 9,898
  • Reputation: 4,371
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 August 2013 - 09:06 AM

Yeah, when you take into account that Cam is an option to run, plus a healthy Williams and Stewart...I mean there is only one football.

 

They key is balance, not 1,000 yard rushers, not on this team.



#12 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,811
  • Reputation: 13,353
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 August 2013 - 09:17 AM

...plus a healthy Williams and Stewart....


That part's a little iffy right now.

(but hey, what's new?)

I do think you should probably throw Kenjon Barner in that mix.

#13 firstdayfan

firstdayfan

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 07-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,688
  • Reputation: 188
  • LocationColumbia, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 13 August 2013 - 09:33 AM

Its been said plenty of times but I honestly believe Chud called plays to get a head coaching job last season.  People got a whif during Cam's rookie season and then last year he got so cute.  Riveria even said during a recent interview that they had to adjust things after a self scout during week five.  Wonder if that was Riveria stepping in and telling him to stop or what.



#14 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,334
  • Reputation: 2,940
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 13 August 2013 - 09:44 AM

Hard to say what it is because we don't know exactly what was "promised", but we do know that Big Mike was coming to a situation with a backfield of capable runners (including Cam). Everybody knew this, so he had to know it too.  So what exactly was promised? Sounds like more of a misunderstanding than sour grapes.  

 

Basically we don't have enough specific information to make that determination.



#15 RelaxImaPro

RelaxImaPro

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 16-April 12
  • posts: 3,111
  • Reputation: 3,168
  • LocationThe Moon
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 August 2013 - 09:56 AM

Oh yeah?  Well we were promised a Super Bowl win - complete with a full-page ad in the newspaper and everything.  We're still waiting on that one...



#16 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 13 August 2013 - 10:05 AM

So...valid point or sour grapes from someone who didn't get the ball as much as he thought he should?

valid point. i remember heading into last year lot's of talk and excitement from other players about the range of ways that tolbert was going to be used. that had to come from somewhere. people were also considering chud to be a mad scientist so i expect that they saw a lot more in the playbook than was actually being used.



#17 mbarbour21

mbarbour21

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 16-May 13
  • posts: 1,293
  • Reputation: 504
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 August 2013 - 10:12 AM

I just hope he is more interested in winning than padding his stats. I think he is, prob just voicing his opinions. Im sure he isnt the only one with broken promises. He will get his touches too, but he better make them count. We hav a lot of talent in the backfield. He won't get the same amount he did in San Diego.

#18 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • posts: 15,597
  • Reputation: 1,635
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 August 2013 - 10:15 AM

the broken promises was mentioned by DWill that they would game plan all week to run the ball and then Chud would bail on game day.

 

doesn't sound like sour grapes more so than just stating a fact.



#19 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 13 August 2013 - 10:17 AM

See you later Chud.



#20 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,421
  • Reputation: 2,152
  • LocationAt the lake
HUDDLER

Posted 13 August 2013 - 10:27 AM

Maybe he didn't reach those rushing numbers because there's too many starting running backs on this team and it's a passing league

Teams on average still rush the ball over 40% of the time so there are plenty of carries to be had.  You are right though, we didn't use Tolbert in the read option at all which was a big part of last year in the first half.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users