Official Panthers - Seahawks Gameday Thread

2,053 posts in this topic

know the rules better, it's not as bad as you think.


I know the rules but its was still ticky tacky. Really the first time Smith was ran out he could not have came back in sooner the second time was on him but they still fugged that up.


It was poor ST all around but they were still a lot of missed and bad calls in this game.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not talking about our receivers, and even then...they are still scrubs.  Outside of Steve Smith and the occasional Brandon Lafell soft spot, there is nothing there.  I mean for god's sake, Armanti Edwards is still a player on this team.


I wasn't talking about your receivers, either. I was talking about OUR receivers, the Seahawks'. You can't handicap your team properly if you're not objective. We have a very good stable of receivers, but because the vast majority of fans and analysts focus on pure #'s, yards catches, they don't actually look at the metrics.


The Seahawks' receivers have excellent yards per play, YAC, excellent catch per target, etc. They are very good, but get fewer balls because it's a run first team and Wilson spreads it around very, very well.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last add: I just looked at the stat line and thought I was seeing things. This was such a messy game, such a tough battle vs. your D line, I'm not sure I saw the same game they played! I would have totally expected the two QB stat lines to be reversed.


R. Wilson 25/33 320 9.7 1 0 2-20 115.7



C. Newton 16/23 125 5.4 1 0 1-6 97.2


God, it seemed like Wilson did nothing but scramble and toss the ball when he had a chance. I have no idea how that became a 300 yd game!


And with Newton, it seemed he could do no wrong most of the game. He did, iirc, miss two inexplicably, but the rest was pretty good. Totally amazed when I saw his yards at 125! 250, sure, on a dink-and-dunk day, but 125? Freaked me out.


Does anyone else feel like they watched this game in the Twilight Zone?


Both had good ratings, however, with Cam at 97 or something like that.


Speaking of Cam, I saw some posts saying Cam sucks, but that's obviously not true. He stayed poised in a tough, frustrating game with a poor receiving corps. The kid can toss the rock. Give him a little O line and at least one more receiver - and maybe a new coaching staff - and he'll be awesome.


Don't overreact. He's a keeper.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now