Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Fiz

blaming the generals

50 posts in this topic

back in the day when there were wars against western nations, the defeated nation would typically head home with their tail between their legs and everyone would blame the leadership for the poor performance. It was easier to imagine that their soldiers (typically theirs sons etc) were just as good as those fuging prussian pigs, or those papist french, or the godless british sailors, or whatever; they just had a few jews or whatever that had snuck into the upper echelons and fuged it up.

 

better leaders and we're just as good as the rest of them! next war!

 

well, sometimes the soldiers just aren't that good. italian soldiers weren't defeated by ethiopia because of bad leadership. the americans didn't get routed by canada because they didn't have good generals. sometimes your soldiers just fuging blow....

 

....even your favorite one. 

 

It's easy as fans to pin everything on the coaching staff, because it's easier to fire 10 dudes than replace 30. 

 

It's easy to blame the lack of development and, dare I say regression, of a certain favorite player, on the bad coaching, other elements, weather, commercial shooting schedule, etc.

 

sometimes the british send a bunch of inbred australians over the barricades into machine gun fire. sometimes the soldiers just can't cut it against starving koreans/vietnamese. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That "Glory" was a good movie.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Toby keith said we'll put a boot in their ass because its the merican way

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a whole lot of words just to say what we already have several other threads about.

0/10.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John Fox took a 1-15 team to 7-9 in one year, then the Super Bowl the year after without a huge amount of player turnover. Sometimes it is the leadership.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think luck is just as big a factor as strategy in Risk. Damn dice!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe....

 

....but those "generals" are the ones who decided Byron Bell and the like could get the job done, right? Those "generals" basically trained a bunch of guys how to use a sword, then took them into a firefight. The bullets always win...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alex Smith, RG3 and Eli all have 5TDs. One of these teams are 3-0 and the rest are 0-2. I think it's safe to say that because Alex Smith's team has more wins, he is better than those two.

 

How about this, Russell Wilson has 2 TDs so far compared to Cam and Kaep both with 3TD. Shehawks are 2-0, Panthers 0-2 and Kaep 1-1. Similar production levels but different TEAM results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think luck is just as big a factor as strategy in Risk. Damn dice!

Luck is an extremely critical aspect in the game of football and nobody likes to think about it because you just can't strategize for the bounce of the ball.

Case in point: DeAngelo's fumble came about because he spun around just in time for Chancellor to have a good angle at hitting ball out. If he had simply fell to the ground rather than turning back towards the field he'd be down, we'd keep the ball and likely score.

Against Buffalo, Luke reaches out and taps Stevie Johnson as he runs by, likely on reflex alone. The ref calls an incorrect pass interference call instead of defensive holding and it negates the game-clinching interception.

Football is probably one of the most luck-influenced sports in the entire world. And it sucks that our luck has been pure shite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Posts

    • If Charlotte didn't have an NBA team I would not watch pro basketball. The NBA is the only major sports league that has no parity. Who would have thought the Panthers would have made the Super Bowl a couple years ago, who had the Predators in the Stanley Cup Finals this year, did anyone project an Indians vs. Cubs matchup in the World Series last year? Probably not!  But at the beginning of the NBA season everyone predicted a Warriors/Cavs final. There is absolutely no parity. Since 2010 (2009 for MLB) NFL: 12 different teams have made the Super Bowl NHL: 11 different teams have made the Stanley Cup Finals MLB: 11 different teams have made the World Seeie NBA: 8 different teams have made the NBA Finals The NBA is the only major sports league where there is a greater than 50% chance that you will see at least one team in the finals that you've seen there in the last 7 years. I particularly pull for the Hornets because of the pride I have for Charlotte and because I like the game of basketball. But it does suck knowing before the season even starts that we don't have a shot a championship.


    • We will never be calling Greg that

      And OBJ is still garbage


      Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle
    • So as of right now the roster looks like... PG: Kemb, ???, Weber SG: Batum, Monk, Graham SF: MKG, Lamb, Bacon PF: Marv, Tank, O'Bryant C: Howard, Zeller, ??? The MLE is projected to be around 8 million and the bi annual exception is projected to be around 3. The point guard market is pretty horrible but I am a big fan of Patty Mills and as bad as the point guard market is, the center market is much, much worse. I wouldn't be surprised if the Hornets added Mathiang are Karnowski as depth for the center position.