Jump to content


* - - - - 1 votes

ESPN is gonna be pissed if we keep winning...


  • Please log in to reply
100 replies to this topic

#91 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,350 posts

Posted 26 September 2013 - 02:16 PM

I'm not saying he looks great, but I'm sure RG3 is not the first QB who ever start slow in a game. So the game against the eagles with 9:15 left down 33-20 in the 4th with a redskin possession is considered uncontested? Why didn't the eagles pull their starter? Were they running the score? Or maybe RG3 was putting up those numbers against 3rd stringer to pad his stat. Come on, now! I don't wanna hear between the numbers story. 325 yards/game 63% comp. is good no matter what standard. Teams don't take their foot off the gas. That's what the 3rd stringers are for. Teams don't play soft with their starters because it risks injuries.

I don't think you have watched any of the Redskins games and just looked at the box scores.

The Eagles were up 30+ points and conceded little 8 yard passes.

Once the score did get to 33-20 and the Eagles tightened their defense up again the Redskins went out on downs. By the time they got the ball back the Eagles once again was conceding short throws to try to make the Skins use up time.

They had literally zero meaningful scoring drives.

It wasn't a slow start it was a no show.

#92 AceBoogie

AceBoogie

    LiveStrong

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,454 posts

Posted 26 September 2013 - 05:24 PM

ROY just like Cam. shut case.


Russell Wilson got robbed. How the fug do you give the Roy award to somebody who didn't play the whole season. And his damn back up came in and beat the Ravens for him. No to mention beating the browns throwing for more passing yards in that game than RG3 had in any game all season. Kirk Cousins deserves a 1/4 of that award.

#93 mc52beast

mc52beast

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 658 posts

Posted 26 September 2013 - 06:39 PM

You know how to shut down the trash talkers? YOU START WINNING GAMES.... EVEN CLOSE GAMES. Until this team proves that it can win and win on a consistent basis, that is the crap you're going to hear.



#94 Guest_KingKam_*

Guest_KingKam_*
  • Guests

Posted 26 September 2013 - 07:21 PM

Russell Wilson got robbed. How the fug do you give the Roy award to somebody who didn't play the whole season. And his damn back up came in and beat the Ravens for him. No to mention beating the browns throwing for more passing yards in that game than RG3 had in any game all season. Kirk Cousins deserves a 1/4 of that award.

you guys are beasting with the hate.



#95 Lumps

Lumps

    watch porn

  • ALL-PRO
  • 5,183 posts
  • LocationSouth Charlotte

Posted 26 September 2013 - 07:32 PM

I don't see the issue with ESPN.

 

The issue is with the morons who don't understand media/sports journalism and think what ESPN says is meant to be accurate and biasless.

 



#96 Guest_KingKam_*

Guest_KingKam_*
  • Guests

Posted 26 September 2013 - 07:33 PM

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I've ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response was there anything that could even be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

so 1980s. The point rodgers is not that much better at throwing the football than other comparable QBs of his peers. Comparing his throwing ability to another QB is not blasphemy because supporting cast is as important.



#97 Guest_KingKam_*

Guest_KingKam_*
  • Guests

Posted 26 September 2013 - 07:39 PM

I don't think you have watched any of the Redskins games and just looked at the box scores.

The Eagles were up 30+ points and conceded little 8 yard passes.

Once the score did get to 33-20 and the Eagles tightened their defense up again the Redskins went out on downs. By the time they got the ball back the Eagles once again was conceding short throws to try to make the Skins use up time.

They had literally zero meaningful scoring drives.

It wasn't a slow start it was a no show.

The winner of the playa hata ball goes to....



#98 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • ALL-PRO
  • 8,670 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 26 September 2013 - 07:41 PM

you are boring



#99 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,350 posts

Posted 26 September 2013 - 07:47 PM

The winner of the playa hata ball goes to....


Thank you *takes bow*

I don't hate RG3. Not at all. I thought he should be rookie of the year last season.

I still think he is going to be good. The closest I have come to being critical if RG3 was that before the season I thought he was the most likely to have a sophomore slump because I don't think he is healthy.

I don't think he is healthy. Or he is really rusty. But the truth if you actually watched the games is he has played poorly. Or at least he did the first two games. I haven't seen the third game yet so I don't really have an opinion on that game.

But it isn't hate, I think he is great when healthy. It is just the truth.

#100 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,558 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 26 September 2013 - 11:30 PM

I don't really think ESPN 'hates' the Panthers, and I seriously doubt our team having success will piss anybody off.  Heck, they improved the quality of the Panthers coverage by assigning David Newton to the Panthers beat.

 

We're just not part of their narrative.  And honestly, we haven't earned much of a right to be over the last several years.

 

If that changes, they'll adjust their talking points, but I seriously doubt much of anyone will be ticked about it.

 

 



#101 PantherGuy

PantherGuy

    MEMBER

  • ALL-PRO
  • 808 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 27 September 2013 - 12:18 AM

I don't really think ESPN 'hates' the Panthers, and I seriously doubt our team having success will piss anybody off.  Heck, they improved the quality of the Panthers coverage by assigning David Newton to the Panthers beat.

 

We're just not part of their narrative.  And honestly, we haven't earned much of a right to be over the last several years.

 

If that changes, they'll adjust their talking points, but I seriously doubt much of anyone will be ticked about it.

 

Agreed. To ESPN, we just kind of exist, but not in any way that really affects them. They talk about the teams that will attract superior ratings for them. Right now, we are not one of those teams. Can't really see anyone at ESPN hating us. They just ignore us, like they ignore everything that doesn't give them a story line they deem compelling.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com