Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Dash Global

Our offense style / scheme is not gonna cut it

82 posts in this topic

I have never got the whole "we need to be a time control / conservative / establish the run" offense. 

 

That is only good for inferior teams HOPING to keep the game close. 

 

We should WANT to be an explosive high scoring offense. Plain and fugging simple. 

 

No reason why we cant march down the field quickly and score a TD. Then kick off and get a 3 n out and go score again. Rinse and repeat. Fug this notion it will tire our D or any other excuse to why we should be conservative on offense. 

 

The offense ALWAYS have the upper hand, so when we face QBs like Manning, Brees, Brady, Rodgers they will shred our D. Their is always an answer for what ever the D is doing. Getting pressure ok quick 3 step routes. Playing man ok comebacks, drags/crosses, slants etc. Playing zone ok we will flood and/or find the holes. Light box ok we will run. Load the box ok we will pass. Play inside technique ok out routes. Play outside technique ok inside slants. Bring the safeties down ok over the top. I could go on and on. No matter how good your D is you will not be able to stop elite QBs and OCs every night. You must be able to match them score for score. IE We need to be AVERAGING 28+ ppg. 

 

We have faced 2 elite QBs this year and both of them SHREDDED our D. Brady marched right down the field on literally every possession. Only reason we won was because their D sucked and we were able to match the score for score. Not to mention getting help from the refs late. 

 

In todays NFL Cam should be averaging 300+ pass yards per game. With the RBs getting about 100+ yards a game. 

 

If your QB is averaging 200 pass yards a game you better be averaging 200-300 yards rushing a game. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we would probably be competing with seattle for HFA if we did the smart thing and hired hue jackson

 

thankfully he's currently a RB coach for cincy (and their rooking RB is tearing poo up btw), so we still have a (small) chance of doing the right thing.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need 2011 Offense with 2013 Defense

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting beat by NO in the dome results in this?

 

Good God.

 

OK.  I guess we suck now?

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting beat by NO in the dome results in this?

 

Good God.

 

OK.  I guess we suck now?

 

This loss has NOTHING to do with the simple fact we need to change our philosophy on O. 

 

The only thing this loss does is highlight the fact (along with the NE game) that elite QBs can and will shred elite Ds. The offense will always have the upper hand. 

 

We must be able to match them score for score and generally speaking you better be putting up 24-28 ppg when facing the likes of Manning, Brady, Brees, and Rodgers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't attack anybody on offense any more. We aim to control clock instead of being aggressive and really opening up the play book. As our defense has gotten better it's like we shifted to this very vanilla deal.

Vanilla sucks. We need more flavor

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based upon your sig, you want the Panthers to run some gimicky ass offense that my school's defense made up of 18 and 19 year olds shut down two years in a row.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need OL and WR talent to be what OP wants.....

We don't have that

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A balanced offense is good but this balanced offense of ours is def the cover up of having no legitimate no1 receiver.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WaPo isn't partners with the CIA. Amazon Web Services, which sells servers to thousands upon thousands of companies and websites, sold servers to the CIA. You can buy your own now right here. Does that make you partners with the WaPo? https://aws.amazon.com When Jimmy Dore says "600 million dollars is more than the Washington Post is even worth!" he's being a dumbass. The Washington Post didn't make the deal with the CIA so what they're worth is irrelevant. Amazon Web Services sold them servers, and they happen to have the same parent company as the Washington Post. The thing about Jimmy Dore is that he is absolutely utterly obsessed with Hillary Clinton. Like, utterly obsessed. Everything goes back to Hillary Clinton to him, and his obsession has morphed into skepticism of the Russian investigation, because he views it as an excuse for why Hillary lost. He can't accept the Russia stuff being true because if it's true then maybe Clinton didn't lose on merit. And so his skepticism of the Russia investigation has led him down the path of 'well the Deep State is conspiring against Trump' and 'the Deep State is the real true evil.' He fact-checks nothing. It's Alex Jones level poo.
    • Anyone who can equate any modern presidency at any moment in time with the embarrassment we see right now is off their gd rocker. What is really telling is that we now see that Trump can't just be casual.  He can't just talk it up with other peers.  He can't just chill the f*ck out. Seriously....people like this are weird as hell.   It's been obvious he's the head of a business but not a business savvy guy since the Apprentice.  I don't understand why we want the Sharknado meets 80s bad guy of Presidents.