Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

PantherBrew

Best Home field Advantage. Wow.

59 posts in this topic

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/10170641/bill-barnwell-best-home-field-advantages

 

 

 

 

 

To figure out who has the best home-field advantage in football, I went through the recent past and figured out the point differential for each team in their regular-season home and road games.1 To figure out their home-field advantage, I subtracted the road differential from the home differential and divided by two (since we're measuring home-field performance versus, theoretically, a neutral field). Games that weren't played at a team's typical home stadium, like the London international series or Buffalo's annual game in Toronto, were considered to be neutral-site games and excluded from the study.

As an example, take the home-field performance of the Seahawks since 2002, when they opened their new stadium in downtown Seattle. The average Seahawks home game over that time frame has seen them win by exactly one touchdown, 7.0 points. Only four other teams have won their home games by a larger average margin than the Seahawks. Those teams are each better on the road, though, than Seattle; the Seahawks lose their average road game by 3.3 points. That's a swing of 10.3 points the moment Seattle gets on a plane, which suggests that Seattle's home-field advantage is worth 5.2 points. That is, as you might expect, the most impressive observed home-field advantage in football during that time frame.

Here's a table with each team's home-field advantage in its current stadium, leaving out any games from before it moved into its new stadium. This only includes games since 2002, since that's when the NFL expanded to its current 32-team size, divisional structure, and schedule.

2d0go7l.jpg

 

 

 

If you don't believe point differential really captures the way a team plays at home and on the road, there's an even simpler way to analyze this: winning percentage at home and on the road. I'm a little uncomfortable with the small samples2 for teams with brand-new stadiums, but the numbers are mostly similar to the table above. Here are the top and bottom five teams in terms of the gap in their winning percentage at home and on the road:

mh5xk4.jpg

 

 

I do realize a lof of this has to do with just having an overall shitty teams since 2002. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So by "best home field advantage", you meant 31st best right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer to think that our team simply is not fazed by opposing crowds and therefore plays close to the same regardless.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So by "best home field advantage", you meant 31st best right?

 

 

 

I was summarizing the article purpose.  

 

and you, my friend, are not one to judge threads. 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I was summarizing the article purpose.  

 

and you, my friend, are not one to judge threads. 

 

Interesting information.  Your thread title, however, sucks. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting information.  Your thread title, however, sucks. 

 

 

It enticed you to click and read the article, so apparently it was successful.

 

Sorry about your post.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep sounds about right.  Good thing we have a team now that thrives at home.  We are one Deangelo Williams fumble away from being 7-0 at home this season.  Pretty darn impressive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread title implies the Panthers have the best homefield advantage when the article says they have the 31st. Article is interesting, title is terrible as are 90% of Huddle thread titles that's all I was saying.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread title implies the Panthers have the best homefield advantage when the article says they have the 31st. Article is interesting, title is terrible as are 90% of Huddle thread titles that's all I was saying.

It's an article about the best home field advantages. You inferred it was about the Panthers.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree.  I would really hate to give up any of our picks in the first four rounds of this draft.  Having more could be beneficial. A lot of people just seem convinced that at 8 we are guaranteed some elite prospect.   I think at 8 we might be getting into that third tier of players 1st tier: Garrett 2nd tier:  Adams, Allen, Fournette, Thomas 3rd tier: ????? Not saying these guys are in the correct tiers but my point is that this third tier might be a little larger and more varied than some people think.  Also at this point the players might be graded fairly close and need might factor in more.   You might move from 8 to 12 and still draft the player you want.    
    • True dat, but our DT are all high round picks too, Star, KK and Butler push that center so it frees up the LB. Our best was 2013 when we had the best front 7 in football
    • With Ginn not being resigned Ross seems like the logical answer.  We definately could use a speed type of guy.  Our offense seems predicated on having one. Davis is interesting though because he might have the ability to become that so called #1 type of receiver.  If you don't believe we have one of those on the roster than he would be a good fit also.  Do we have that all around receiver that has enough speed to go deep while also having the size and strength to make the contested catch. What is best case for both? DeSean Jackson comp for Ross? A.J. Green for Davis?