Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

DeAngelo Williams appreciation thread.


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#31 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 24,279 posts

Posted 23 December 2013 - 04:14 PM

Yep, get rid of Jstew and he is much more productive.


He isn't more productive. He just isn't a walking injury waiting to happen.

#32 TN05

TN05

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 692 posts
  • LocationConover, North Carolina

Posted 23 December 2013 - 04:20 PM

He's done all we've asked him to do, I can't complain. He's over 1,000 total yards for the season (810 rushing, 258 receiving), hasn't fumbled since week 1, and has more than made up for that game by giving us crucial touchdowns against the Niners, Jets, and Saints... and call me crazy, but I don't think it would be out of the question for him to get close to 1,000 rushing yards given we play in a dome next week and won't have our top receiving threat. He's still a genuine home-run threat and the only one we have besides Ted Ginn. Heck, I'd argue he's been far less of a boom-or-bust back this year given he's averaging 4.3 YPC but has only had two runs longer than 25 yards.



#33 Camsfanclub

Camsfanclub

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 356 posts

Posted 23 December 2013 - 04:23 PM

He isn't more productive. He just isn't a walking injury waiting to happen.

If you look at the numbers he does much better when he gets 15+ touches.



#34 tjmurray

tjmurray

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts
  • LocationMemphis, Tn

Posted 23 December 2013 - 05:20 PM

If you look at the numbers he does much better when he gets 15+ touches.


CRA sees what he wants to see. He only use numbers when it fits his bogus narrative. Gotta love CRA.

#35 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 24,279 posts

Posted 23 December 2013 - 05:42 PM

If you look at the numbers he does much better when he gets 15+ touches.


Okay....

Stewart, Tolbert also do better with more opportunities as well. I never said Williams didn't.

#36 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 24,279 posts

Posted 23 December 2013 - 05:45 PM

CRA sees what he wants to see. He only use numbers when it fits his bogus narrative. Gotta love CRA.


You see what you want.....

That wasn't a Williams diss.

Williams and Stewart are both better RBs when they don't share.

When Stewart is healthy, Williams isn't a more productive RB. He may get the ball more and have more yards. That is just one getting more opportunities.

Both are about equal in terms of production despite being different RBs.

Too sensitive about 34. Everything taken as disrespect even when it doesn't exist

#37 tjmurray

tjmurray

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts
  • LocationMemphis, Tn

Posted 23 December 2013 - 06:31 PM

You see what you want.....

That wasn't a Williams diss.

Williams and Stewart are both better RBs when they don't share.

When Stewart is healthy, Williams isn't a more productive RB. He may get the ball more and have more yards. That is just one getting more opportunities.

Both are about equal in terms of production despite being different RBs.

Too sensitive about 34. Everything taken as disrespect even when it doesn't exist


Did I say it was a diss? I made a statement about you picking and choosing to use numbers when it fits your narrative. That is what you do. After one fumble in the opening game you throw out some numbers to fit your bogus narrative that DeAngelo is fumble prone. When Stewart had that fumble against San Fran I didnt hear nothing from you tho. That is what you do. Has nothing to do with anybody being sensitive about anybody. When anybody has anything remotely positive to say about DeAngelo you reply to that comment with a negative one. There are many posters who are critical of DeAngelo on here but noone replies to positive posts about DeAngelo with negative feedback as you do. That is just being real. Nothing about sensitivity. To say Stewart has been as productive as DeAngelo has been is just nonsense. I am talking about the last 2 years since signing his contract. When he was given the ball and featured last season was he more productive? When he was given the ball and featured against Tampa this season was he mire productive? DeAngelo had 50+ yards on 8 carries against that same ball club with a 20+ yard score. See, you seem to ignore those numbers tho. Last year when DeAngelo was reinserted in the lineup and start being productive again you dismissed it because of lousy competition. That is what you do. It's all good. Merry Christmas CRA

Attached Files



#38 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 24,279 posts

Posted 23 December 2013 - 07:10 PM

Did I say it was a diss? I made a statement about you picking and choosing to use numbers when it fits your narrative. That is what you do. After one fumble in the opening game you throw out some numbers to fit your bogus narrative that DeAngelo is fumble prone. When Stewart had that fumble against San Fran I didnt hear nothing from you tho. That is what you do. Has nothing to do with anybody being sensitive about anybody. When anybody has anything remotely positive to say about DeAngelo you reply to that comment with a negative one. There are many posters who are critical of DeAngelo on here but noone replies to positive posts about DeAngelo with negative feedback as you do. That is just being real. Nothing about sensitivity. To say Stewart has been as productive as DeAngelo has been is just nonsense. I am talking about the last 2 years since signing his contract. When he was given the ball and featured last season was he more productive? When he was given the ball and featured against Tampa this season was he mire productive? DeAngelo had 50+ yards on 8 carries against that same ball club with a 20+ yard score. See, you seem to ignore those numbers tho. Last year when DeAngelo was reinserted in the lineup and start being productive again you dismissed it because of lousy competition. That is what you do. It's all good. Merry Christmas CRA


Yes, you implied it was a diss

No, I didn't knock Williams

and my post about was a reply about WHY someone claimed you should cut Stewart. I disagreed with the reasoning or better the wording used.

Too sensitive and about 34. In fact I have predicted big games from him this year and praised him as recently as prior to the NO game for the way he ran against the Jets.

RBs are RBs. A healthy Williams or Stewart? We just need one....bc if a healthy one gets 20 touches one isn't better than the other overall (just different backs). As I said in my post....Stewart is a walking injury waiting to happen.... I like THAT reasoning if you want to dump him.

Merry Christmas

#39 2jakefansinva

2jakefansinva

    Coach Jack Bolton

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,602 posts

Posted 23 December 2013 - 08:48 PM

I myself can't wait for the DWill and JStew era to be over...........we need to move on and move on fast.



#40 raleigh-panther

raleigh-panther

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,217 posts

Posted 23 December 2013 - 09:45 PM

I love Deangelo..good ball player and by all accounts a better person and Dad.

So many people don't give him credit.

If a QB could use a decent oline for a decent performance so could a running back,


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.