Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Jangler

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 trailer

36 posts in this topic


 
http://www.zimbio.com/The+Amazing+Spider-Man+2/articles/Nk2VxP5kc14/Amazing+Spider+Man+2+Many+8+Villains
 
 

Yesterday, Amazing Spider-Man 2 director Marc Webb revealed via Twitter that BJ Novak would be playing wheelchair-bound robotics expert and villain Alistair Smythe in the upcoming movie. While there's nothing in the promotional materials so far suggesting he'll actually be facing off with Spidey onscreen, he represents yet another baddie thrown into a movie already packed with them.

So just how many villains are there in the new movie? Let's tick them off.
 
1. Electro (The Star Villain)
2. Rhino (Supporting Villain)
3. Green Goblin (Supporting Villain)
4. Alistair Smythe (Possible Villain)
5. Doctor Octopus (Teased)
6. The Vulture (Teased)
All we have to go on here is the above photo, but since we also know Sony is planning on a Sinister Six movie, there's a good chance they'll bring in the Vulture, a staple member of the famous rogue's gallery.
7. The Lizard (Probably Not This Movie)
8. Venom (Might Show Up)
Since Sony has already announced plans for a Venom stand-alone movie, they'll have to introduce Bugle reporter Eddie Brock at some point, and we wouldn't be surprised to see him make a quick cameo in ASM2 just to establish the character.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Green Goblin looks absolutely awful. It boggles my mind how they could screw up his look in two different franchises. I mean, is it REALLY that hard to just give him the comic book look?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Electro looks terrible as well. Give him the old school costume and the mask doesn't have to have too big of bolts on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Foxx as electro?

I seriously think movies are way better and less cheesy when villains are played by not extremely well known actors.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fox looks like Mr.freeze from batman and robin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just like the first TASM I'm sure it'll be an enjoyable movie but whoever is designing the villains costumes really needs to be fired. The only one that I personally think has looked decent is Electro. But I always liked the Ultimate Electro look more than the classic. I'm going to have the same problem with this movie as I did the last one. "man this is pretty fun but the Lizard/Green Goblin really looks like poo"

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It actually looks good. One thing I am worried about is putting three villians in the movie at once. We all seen how Spiderman 3 turned out. I was ashamed of how they did Venom in the serious. I actually prefer this type of Spiderman in the current series. The trailer looks good and believe Fox will play the character well. I was skeptical about him when he started acting but I seen quite a few of his movies and he really gets into character. Should be fun!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just like the first TASM I'm sure it'll be an enjoyable movie but whoever is designing the villains costumes really needs to be fired. The only one that I personally think has looked decent is Electro. But I always liked the Ultimate Electro look more than the classic. I'm going to have the same problem with this movie as I did the last one. "man this is pretty fun but the Lizard/Green Goblin really looks like poo"

I thought The Lizard looked great in the first movie. Loved the scene where Spidey was crawling all over him. good stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The movie is a complete turd. Don't waste your money going to watch it. It's seriously almost if not worse than Spiderman 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The movie is a complete turd. Don't waste your money going to watch it. It's seriously almost if not worse than Spiderman 3.

 

 

please be lying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @Panthro Proving Medical Malpractice Based on Diagnostic Errors The law does not hold doctors legally responsible for all diagnostic errors. Instead, patients usually must prove three things in order to prevail in a medical malpractice lawsuit based on a wrong diagnosis: A doctor-patient relationship existed. The doctor was negligent -- that is, did not provide treatment in a reasonably skillful and competent manner. The doctor's negligence caused actual injury to the patient. Most medical malpractice cases hinge on either the second or third element (or both) -- was the doctor negligent and did that negligence harm the patient?   Easily provable  1. ER dr saw mom and had all the records. Mom was healthy prior, no issues besides a murmur she was born with. 2. Motrin does dot fix the flu especially if you one has A and B. Greenville drs from ICU would testify against New Bern ER doc. No tamiflu prescribed nor any other treatment besides Motrin. (Anybody can take Tylenol/asprin but tamiflu is prescribed) 3. Without x raying or running further test, mom went from early caught flu to both pneumonia that now developed 3rd stage ARDS and now pulmonary fibrosis is setting in. Due this negligence, mom will live at most 5 years in poor quality will my dad ends bankrupt. I just proved how not properly treating mom has lead to a snowball effect due to incompetence which lead to where we are now. Dad was not given a course of action, he does not have a M.D. at the end of his name, and the hippocratic oath has been tarnished. I am in the settle or I will find out how he will lose his license. I will file a complaint with the hospital and board. Publish in the newspaper about his care and online. My mom will never be the same. 
    • Grigson put in a lot of effort to try and stack the receiving corps. Not all of it was smart effort, but it was effort. O-Line, on the other hand...