Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

Andre Roberts - The Affordable Receiver That We Should Be Thinking ABout


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#21 jasonluckydog

jasonluckydog

    Honorary Honeydick Member

  • Joined: 28-December 08
  • posts: 13,592
  • Reputation: 3,370
  • LocationGATOR CREEK- SC
SUPPORTER

Posted 10 March 2014 - 09:08 PM

Roberts is a local guy followed him at the Citadel would love to have him and Smitty



#22 JJman

JJman

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 07-March 14
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,232
  • Reputation: 1,299
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 10 March 2014 - 09:08 PM

I don't want Benjamin. Especially if Cooks or OBJ are on the board still. Benjamin has a lot of flaws in his game and IMO his best attribute is his size. Might as well take Amaro or ASJ if we're drafting a receiver based on size.

I'd be on board for Roberts. It just depends on his asking price, of course.

#23 chbright

chbright

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 816
  • Reputation: 2
HUDDLER

Posted 10 March 2014 - 09:11 PM

Sanders/Roberts + Pettigrew + Moncrief/Mathews would be ideal. Get a extremely under rated te that's young and has potential plus an emerging wr via fa would do wonders even if smitty gets moved (God forbid)

#24 Dollar Store Dave

Dollar Store Dave

    Formerly Know As Ruff

  • Joined: 27-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,966
  • Reputation: 2,594
HUDDLER

Posted 10 March 2014 - 09:13 PM

Downfield blockers who can't stretch the field?


Nailed it.

#25 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,677
  • Reputation: 1,123
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 10 March 2014 - 09:26 PM

Sanders/Roberts + Pettigrew + Moncrief/Mathews would be ideal. Get a extremely under rated te that's young and has potential plus an emerging wr via fa would do wonders even if smitty gets moved (God forbid)


Personally, I would take a pass on Pettigrew. The Lions kinda want him back. Plus, he has bad concentration issues, and does not block all that well.

I am sure there are other TEs out there that could give us better than Pet. Great talent, lousy production.

Roberts sounds intriguing. Throw in Nicks, ha, and draft a stud. Just maybe we could have a decent corp. Although I am still concerned about the return game if we lose Ginn Jr. He is one piece I would like back.

#26 Mojo

Mojo

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 02-February 14
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,317
  • Reputation: 649
  • LocationPasadena, CA
HUDDLER

Posted 10 March 2014 - 09:45 PM

Agree with Keem and Roberts.  



#27 hepcat

hepcat

    Skandalouz

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,091
  • Reputation: 1,812
HUDDLER

Posted 11 March 2014 - 12:00 AM

Roberts would be a solid signing.  I have a feeling Carolina is drafting a WR early though.....



#28 solorca

solorca

    Eric Shelton Superfan.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 420
  • Reputation: 215
HUDDLER

Posted 11 March 2014 - 08:16 AM

Roberts would be a solid signing.  I have a feeling Carolina is drafting a WR early though.....

 

WIth McNutt and King the only receivers on the roster, we'll be needing to sign and draft a decent number.

 

For the record, I was a fan of both McNutt and King coming out of the draft, although neither has done anything yet to make me think they'll be useful for us next year.



#29 ARSEN

ARSEN

    Banned

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • posts: 13,610
  • Reputation: 4,288
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 March 2014 - 09:21 AM

Redkins agreed to a deal with Andre Roberts.

 

Per rotoworld

 

 

You can lock this thread..



#30 mjligon

mjligon

    @mleezy53

  • Joined: 30-December 08
  • posts: 3,275
  • Reputation: 1,438
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 March 2014 - 09:23 AM

Redkins agreed to a deal with Andre Roberts.

Per rotoworld


You can lock this thread..


fuging Redskins


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users