Jump to content


Ronald Reagan

Member Since 28 Nov 2008
Offline Last Active May 04 2014 05:22 PM
-----

#2760802 Okay I have 4.5 days to pass a drug test

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 03 May 2014 - 10:16 PM

You are soooooo soooo thick my friend.

In my opening statement I asked if I should stop smoking and attempt to detox myself. Where the FUG did I say I will never stop smoking so that isn't an option?

IGNORANCE. IS. SO. FUGGING. BLISS!!!!!!

 

 

The same idiot that created the no money involved fantasy football league that you still brag about winning. LOL @ your life.

 

 

Okay your attitude and ignorance makes even more sense now that you told me you're a marine hahaha.

PLEASE explain to me how somebody that doesn't even drink and smokes weed a couple times a day sounds like one of your disgusting, addicted, alcoholic family members??

You are seriously just proving my point, alcohol is a DEADLY, ADDICTIVE, and DISGUSTING habit. But I'm sure you have no problem with drinking? Let me guess you're one of the idiots that thinks weed causes lung cancer haha??

 

 

You know what bud haha, you're right.

I am a selfish, alcoholic, disgusting, idiotic racist and I am ruining my life.

Thank you for helping me realize this and overcome my problem.

Semper fi!!!!!!

 

 

Son. your people skills are so for shyt you'll undoubtedly suck at sales so this is all for not anyways.




#2760780 Putin wins

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 03 May 2014 - 09:59 PM

 

 

All Putin has are his nukes... If US finds a weapon to make nuclear weapons useless, Russia loses all the leverage. 

 

 

On March 23, 1983, in a nationally televised address on national security, President Ronald Reagan proposed the development of the technology to intercept enemy nuclear missiles. The plan, called the Strategic Defense Initiative, or S.D.I., was dubbed “Star Wars” by its critics.

The New York Times reported: “In effect, Mr. Reagan proposed to make obsolete the current United States policy of relying on massive retaliation by its ballistic missiles to counter the threat of a Soviet nuclear attack.”

The technology proposed by President Reagan was “decades away from reality,” according to The Times. “White House officials said the new program might involve lasers, microwave devices, particle beams and projectile beams. These devices, most of which are in a very early stage of development, in theory could be directed from satellites, airplanes or land-based installations to shoot down missiles in the air.”

 

 

Peace through strength.




#2647211 The Gipper vs. Barry

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 08 February 2014 - 08:49 PM




#2638162 The Left-Wing Economic Argument in a Nutshell?

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 01 February 2014 - 12:16 PM




#2242620 Obama gets trolled by a lady re: Guantanamo

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 25 May 2013 - 05:34 PM

She'll be audited next week.




#2242617 What would you have us do when the fight comes to America.

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 25 May 2013 - 05:22 PM

Which uniforms do the Terrorists wear and which one do the Drug Dealers wear? Sorry. I'm a bit older, so I'm more used to fighting the Communists.

 

 

Communists?

 

*Asses kicked TYVM*




#2221356 Poll: 29% Think Armed Rebellion Might Soon Be Necessary

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 03 May 2013 - 12:35 AM

Extremist left: wants to get organic food and eliminate GMO's...dressed like an annoying hipster..or homeless dude

Extreme Right: blows up abortion clinics while holding rattlesankes...dressed like Boss Hogg if they own a business or like Uncle Jessie if a workin man. Or a homeless dude..

 

Just pathetic.




#2221298 Poll: 29% Think Armed Rebellion Might Soon Be Necessary

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 02 May 2013 - 10:49 PM

Delhommeys right. people who think we have anything actually leftist in this country have never traveled to other countries. In the mid 90s I spent May First watching the Communists have a freaking giant parade down the main street in Frankfurt Germany.

 

Today we had like 25 protesters at Duke and they were all split on what they wanted to protest, then went back home to watch Dancing with the Stars.

I took care of that. You're welcome.




#1990879 Petraeus resigns over 'extramarital affair'

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 10 November 2012 - 09:21 PM

can we get an IP check on the ol' gipper there?


A casket in Simi Valley Cock sucker.


#1723701 Urgent: Arrests Imminent

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 09 April 2012 - 09:21 PM

In brief...haha ok here we go...

The cost of living will be extremely low. It is said that people will have the option to whether or not they want to work...being that work will no longer be a necessity to survival and a decent living situation. People will have a vast amount of more time to persue and focus on life passions, interests, loved ones, and things that actually matter in the grand scheme of life. Eventually the plan is to get off a currency completely...some say this will take place over a 12 year transitionary period once all this gets started.





How will anything be available for supply, production or consumption? Or will just the people who want to work do all this for humanity? Or perhaps this gigantic mound of gold will make all this magically appear?

How can anyone wake up in the morning and actually spend any time considering this pipe dream?


#1722397 Augusta National And Women

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 08 April 2012 - 07:07 PM

NO


#1668818 "Obamacare" also fights fraud, did you know that?

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 01 March 2012 - 12:09 AM

Dude your Obama nut hugging is beyond comprehension.


;)

Dear Abby,
My husband has a long record of money problems. He runs up huge credit-card
bills and at the end of the month, if I try to pay them off, he shouts at
me, saying I am stealing his money. He says pay the minimum and let our
kids worry about the rest, but already we can hardly keep up with the
interest. Also he has been so arrogant and abusive toward our neighbors that
most of them no longer speak to us. The few that do are an odd bunch, to
whom he has been giving a lot of expensive gifts, running up our bills even
more. Also, he has gotten religious. One week he hangs out with Catholics
and the next with people who say the Pope is the Anti-Christ, and the next
he's with Muslims.. Finally, the last straw. He's demanding that before
anyone can be in the same room with him, they must sign a loyalty oath. It's
just so horribly creepy! Can you help?


Signed,
Lost


Dear Lost,


Stop whining, Michelle. You're getting to live in the White House for free,
travel the world, and have others pay for everything for you.
You can divorce the jerk any time you want. The rest of us are stuck with
this moron five more years!

Signed,
Abby




#1647409 If You Could Undo/Reverse Any Election Result...

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 09 February 2012 - 12:02 AM

Sort of a weird question, but could potentially create some interesting discussion/debate...

If you could go back in time somehow and undo/change/reverse any one election result in order to change our present day situation for the better, which election would it be?

There are a few options I'd look at:

1968: Nixon/Humphrey
Nixon was, perhaps, the absolute worst man to lead an incredibly divided country in the late 60's/early 70's. Even before watergate, but obviously avoiding that clusterfug would be a good thing.

2000: Bush/Gore
Easily the most obvious recent election that could provide a different result for today. Nobody saw 9/11 coming, and it's hard to really say just how Gore would have reacted differently, but it's clear for one that he would have never sent troops into Iraq and would never have given the rich tax breaks that helped blow the deficit up and would have kept more regulations in place, though to be fair that process was long started before Bush was "elected."

How is it clear he wouldn't have sent a military response post 9/11?
The explosions might have accelerated global warming?

But, when I really think about it, there's one election that, IMO, signifies where we really started to go off on a bad track:

1980: Reagan/Carter
Sure, Jimmy Carter was in over his head. He was not a very effective POTUS (despite being a good man who tried), so I can understand completely why Reagan won in a landslide the way he did. Hell, who knows, I may have voted for him myself if I had been alive/old enough in '80. Still, Reagan ushered in the modern era of tax cuts for the rich, giving corporations a free pass to do whatever they please no matter the cost to the working class, and launched an all-out assault on organized labor that is still being felt today. His short-sighted economics ran up huge deficits and likely cost George Bush his re-election in '92 for simply doing the responsible thing by raising taxes.

This was also the point at which the GOP began to drift toward becoming the party of the extreme right. Sure, it didn't happen completely for another decade or so, but Reagan took a party that was center-right and moved it much further to the fringe, which also resulted in the democrats moving to the center - at least economically - compared to the new deal coalition and ideas that had helped to create the thriving middle class. Some people look back at the 80's and have fond memories, but it reminds me of the 20's - an era where the rich got richer and the gap between rich and poor grew, which is never good for the country. I almost wish George Bush would've won the nomination in '80; if a republican had to win over Carter, an early Bush administration would have done far less harm, IMO, than the legacy left behind by Reaganomics.



Let's see, 18% mortgage rates under Carter, Country at an all time low and a laughing stock worldwide.
Reagan? In 8 years while avoiding wars and loss of American lives utilizing peace through strength, ended the Cold War, East Germany etc etc. National Debt? Went up about 1.5 trillion over an 8 year span, acceptable perhaps when a country as large as Russia was held at bay and along with East Germany ultimately defeated. "Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall" .

Posted Image

Obama, on the other hand has continued wars and started new campaigns, all while Americans die and raised the debt 3 trillion dollars in 3 years with much, much more debt to come.



#1609164 Romney's New Hampshire Victory Speech

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 10 January 2012 - 11:13 PM

It went from 900 billion to roughly 2.7 trillion.



More like 1.2 to 2.7 in 8 years while avoiding wars and loss of American lives utilizing peace through strength, ending the Cold War, East Germany etc but whatever.

However, I'm comfortable with that as long as you're comfortable with the National debt raising 3 trillion dollars in 3 years under Obama. Much, much more debt to come this year.


#1588544 Rick Santorum....

Posted by Ronald Reagan on 30 December 2011 - 01:27 AM

How long before he is caught with a male intern?



How would this compare to a sitting President having a young intern suck his dick, lie about it trying to destroy the young woman only to be found a POS when she produced the dress wtih his DNA?

Or is it just the thought of gays doing it that crossses the line?






Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com