Jump to content


Fiz

Member Since 24 Nov 2008
Offline Last Active Today, 07:43 AM
-----

#2955386 PFF now Loves Keuchly

Posted by Fiz on Yesterday, 02:21 PM

Somebody explain their points system to me... I am not familiar with how they do that.

They track individual performances, judge them on a series of metrics, then give them a +/- based on the average performance at their position, or how positively/negatively they impacted the game. 




#2955379 PFF now Loves Keuchly

Posted by Fiz on Yesterday, 02:17 PM

 

I just can't take PFF seriously. Their top 5 QBs through last night (yes, includes yesterday's games):

 

Matt Ryan
Ryan Tannehill
Aaron Rodgers
Colin "Squidward" Kaepernick 
Ryan Fitzpatrick
 
...wat.

 

 

Wait a minute....you mean to tell me with only 12% of the NFL season done stats are wonky and haven't leveled out yet? That things aren't going to change as the year goes on? 

 

You're probably one of those people that thought jeff francoeur was going to bat .400 his entire career too. 




#2955374 PFF now Loves Keuchly

Posted by Fiz on Yesterday, 02:14 PM

PFF, who last year said Keuchly was overrated and the MVP should have gone to Sherman or Watt, now has gotten on board the Keuchly bandwagon.  All it took was a Defensive Rookie of the Year award and a Defensive MVP award to show them maybe he is a little better than they thought.  The reference to Luke is at the very bottom.

 

https://www.profootb...anthers-week-2/

Watt and Sherman were both incredible players, and Watt is maybe the best player in the NFL period. They never once said Kuechly isn't a good player, just that there were players that had better years.

 

You people are fuging passive aggressive as hell about anyone in the national media. 




#2954360 Dear NFL Rookies - Don't trash talk Luke Kuechly

Posted by Fiz on Yesterday, 07:25 AM

ha, nice zod, thanks. 

 

im going to recommend your writeups to some other places off site. I know they probably get shared, but at least people can come here.

 

Not gonna recommend anything else on this site because holy poo what a mess




#2948272 DeAngelo Likely Out Today

Posted by Fiz on 14 September 2014 - 07:46 AM

Good


#2945862 MSNBC Morning Joe: Hardy, Panthers and the War on Women

Posted by Fiz on 12 September 2014 - 02:53 PM

Fun reminder joe Scarborough murdered a girl and got away with it.


#2942341 Around the Horn called for Hardy's suspension

Posted by Fiz on 10 September 2014 - 09:11 PM

guys an appeal doesn't mean you get a redo. if you don't like the ruling you don't just get to toss your hands in the air and say "nope one more time."

 

you have to prove there was a procedural/legal error with the court ruling. with something like DV cases, which are designed to be solved very quickly (just for obvious reasons) a jury trial is not needed.

 

For those of you who think the case doesn't count because he didn't have a jury or that his rights to due process have been superseded, are you telling me that every time you've been to traffic court, or small claims court, those rulings no longer count?

 

Hell, in north carolina in november there's a proposal on the docket for the state to join the other 49 states in the union and allow plaintiffs facing criminal chargers to forgo jury trials altogether!

 

Criminal defendants charged with all but the most serious felonies would be able to have a judge, rather than a jury of their peers, decide whether they are guilty or innocent if voters approve a state constitutional amendment on the November ballot. 

 

The measure is a seemingly bland bit of policy on a ballot topped by a hotly contested U.S. Senate race, but it deals with one of the most fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal and state constitutions. 

 

"If we're depriving you of life, liberty or property, you can get a jury trial," said Lori Kroll, a lawyer who served as chief of staff to former state Sen. Pete Brunstetter, R-Forsyth, when he sponsored the bill that sent the amendment to voters. Both Kroll and Brunstetter now work for Novant Health. 

Read more at http://www.wral.com/...pR7D5GlWYZP4.99




#2941892 Around the Horn called for Hardy's suspension

Posted by Fiz on 10 September 2014 - 06:04 PM

When outside organizations and politics get involved it turns into a witch hunt, people want to be able to say, years from now, I was the first to speak out on that, ecspecially in the media! I hate it, but I feel it's only a matter of time before Greg is suspended as a last itch effort to save face for the NFL front office. Back people into a corner and they will respond irrationally.


I agree that this is a time of heightened, uh, care or whatever, but this is also the time meaningful reforms get passed.

Obviously no one here condones domestic violence but if this spurs the nfl to seriously target it I can't imagine any sensible person being up in arms.


#2941853 Around the Horn called for Hardy's suspension

Posted by Fiz on 10 September 2014 - 05:53 PM

Pardon the Interruption is also calling for it, suspension with pay. Yet the thing I keep trying to grasp my head around is, they are essentially saying Hardy IS guilty. They don't care about what was said in the trial or any of that. They don't care that Hardy has a great chance of being found not guilty, I believe. They are pretty much stating he's guilty. I mean PTI even mentioned they read the transcripts, and they are horrified. I'm asking myself 'Did they really read the transcripts?'.


Oh fug pti is what I meant.

I'm drunk whatever.


#2941750 Goodell will be fired/resign by next week

Posted by Fiz on 10 September 2014 - 05:14 PM

This is such a good thing and I'm really glad he's going to be forced to resign.

 

I hope his 200 million dollar golden parachute and guaranteed k street job will cheer him up




#2941087 No sign of Hardy at practice today!

Posted by Fiz on 10 September 2014 - 12:54 PM

Listen if a girl was actually attacked by hardy, she wouldn't just have a bloody lip and bruised arms, she'd have a broken hip and ruptured ear drum.


#2941017 No sign of Hardy at practice today!

Posted by Fiz on 10 September 2014 - 12:25 PM

Probably because this should have been an open and shut case to tell the truth. May I ask have you followed the case any? If you have, and you were on a jury listening to it, would you convict Hardy?


He didn't choose a bench trial because his lawyer thought it'd be more difficult. You're never going to win a jury trial when a black giant beats up a white girl, no matter how coked up she was, unless you're willing to go full character assassination on her in the press.

And guys the jury trial is an appeal, not a new case. There lawyers will argue that all the legal proceedings either were or weren't up to par. At that point the jury decides, then the judge will either order a new trial or throw it out.

This is very obviously a stall tactic by hardy's legal team do that he can play this season and try to starve out his accuser. It's pretty cynical but nothing new.

I assume the bflpa would appeal a six game suspension to two since the incident took place prior to goodells new rules.

If the panthers were going to suspend him they would have done it already. It looks incredibly cynical to do it now.


#2938732 Cut or Keep Greg Hardy

Posted by Fiz on 09 September 2014 - 09:23 AM

Do you know what kind of assault by chance Fiz? I only ask because assault is a very general charge in that it can very from actual physical violence to being verbally menacing to where someone thinks you will be violent against them.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Assaulting a female which is a class 1 misdemeanor in north carolina and caries with it a sentence no greater than 60 days in jail. 




#2938727 Cut or Keep Greg Hardy

Posted by Fiz on 09 September 2014 - 09:19 AM

And if it makes any of you people who are more concerned with Hardy playing than the girl he assaulted, due process technically hasn't been played out. Hardy did all this planning to request a jury trial if the judge didn't rule in his favor to drag out the legal proceedings. The team is obviously not going to do anything about it.

 

goodell looks really really bad right now and there are whispers he's going to have to fall on his sword for all this. the last thing he needs is the NFLPA blowing up at him for not letting the court case play out before suspending hardy. 




#2938722 Cut or Keep Greg Hardy

Posted by Fiz on 09 September 2014 - 09:18 AM

I'm curious as to how much explaining away the victim can actually do to convince a jury she deserved to be KOd in an elevator.  This isn't as difficult as you are attempting to make it.  

Irrelevant. 

 

If a state prosecutor decided to press aggravated assault charges or whatever, they have it on tape. She wouldn't be called as a witness for the prosecution, and anything that precipitated that event would be deemed irrelevant. 

 

Rice is just lucky she didn't die when she hit her head. 






Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com