Jump to content
Carolina Huddle
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

g5jamz

California to ban use of facial recognition on police body cameras

Recommended Posts



6 minutes ago, TPanther920 said:

Why? 

because, mr. "i need government to be my mommy," the police do not have a right to know your identity by default just because they looked at you.

not only should facial recognition be banned but there are 2 other very important things that must happen immediately.

1. the body cams cannot ever turned off, and if their camera is disconnected or covered in the line of duty, they're fired. 2. police wear trackers that monitor their location and records audio at all times while they are on duty.

these are the first 2 bare minimum reforms that need to happen before they even get consideration for expanding their capabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, rodeo said:

because, mr. "i need government to be my mommy," the police do not have a right to know your identity by default just because they looked at you.

not only should facial recognition be banned but there are 2 other very important things that must happen immediately.

1. the body cams cannot ever turned off, and if their camera is disconnected or covered in the line of duty, they're fired. 2. police wear trackers that monitor their location and records audio at all times while they are on duty.

these are the first 2 bare minimum reforms that need to happen before they even get consideration for expanding their capabilities.

I have no problem with 1 or 2. LE and their accusers will both be held accountable. Why shouldn't LE know who they are dealing with? You are photographed and videoed all day everywhere and no one seems to mind. The bitching occurs when criminals might actually get arrested. 

Edited by TPanther920

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TPanther920 said:

I have no problem with 1 or 2. LE and their accusers will both be held accountable. Why shouldn't LE know who they are dealing with? You are photographed and videoed all day everywhere and no one seems to mind. The bitching occurs when criminals might actually get arrested. 

they can photograph and video all they want, this isn't about them being able to video. video is encouraged. facial recognition software is what this is about, which gives them the ability to instantly know your identity.

that's a violation of the fourth amendment to the constitution. there's a reason they're not allowed to demand your ID if you haven't committed a crime or without probable cause. with facial recognition they won't even have to demand your ID, they'll already have your ID.

and that's if it's not a false positive and you are arrested or killed because you look like a wanted murderer and the software was wrong, which happens quite often.

  • Pie 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 it appears either 24 or 28 states have stop and identify laws. If I am stopped by LE what constitutes  'reasonable suspicion"? Why would they stop me if they didn't suspect something was up or believed I was a suspect?  If I am detained because I refused to ID myself I am asking for an even more intrusive search. A simple "my name is" is all that is required. You are not required to say anything else.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, TPanther920 said:

 it appears either 24 or 28 states have stop and identify laws. If I am stopped by LE what constitutes  'reasonable suspicion"? Why would they stop me if they didn't suspect something was up or believed I was a suspect?  If I am detained because I refused to ID myself I am asking for an even more intrusive search. A simple "my name is" is all that is required. You are not required to say anything else.

 

check your privilege

the rest of your argument is just authoritarian bs

  • Pie 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, TPanther920 said:

Why? 

The truth is, Because facial recognition cannot pick up darker completions nearly as well as lighter. Leading to an absurdly high wrongful arrest count. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Facial recognition isn't prosecuting anyone.  It's helping narrow suspects.  No different than some random dude sketching based on eyewitness accounts.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, g5jamz said:

Facial recognition isn't prosecuting anyone.  It's helping narrow suspects.  No different than some random dude sketching based on eyewitness accounts.  

 

Stop and frisk.  Helping narrow suspects. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Fryfan said:

Stop and frisk.  Helping narrow suspects. 

 

I have never had a problem with Stop and Frisk. 

  • Milkshake 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, g5jamz said:

Facial recognition isn't prosecuting anyone.  It's helping narrow suspects.  No different than some random dude sketching based on eyewitness accounts.  

 

It doesn’t work at the current level. It’s as simple as that. The only reason it works in China is because they all look Chinese and the few that don’t, are easy to spot anyways.

The amount of minorities that have been wrongfully arrested because the system was built around white peoples faces is incredibly dumb. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

It doesn’t work at the current level. It’s as simple as that. The only reason it works in China is because they all look Chinese and the few that don’t, are easy to spot anyways.

The amount of minorities that have been wrongfully arrested because the system was built around white peoples faces is incredibly dumb. 

they've made it clear that this is their intention tbh. it's a feature to them, not a bug.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      20,046
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    CockyTalk
    Joined
  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      145,946
    • Total Posts
      4,777,149
  • Posts

    • I agree with most of your statement except the injury part, let me rephrase, I don’t think cam is injured to the point of missing games as often as it seems. rodgers, luck, Wentz, Watson, Stafford, Trubisky, Jimmy G have missed as much or more time that cam has. He’s had the unfortunate luck of getting hit with a foot injury just after a serious shoulder injury.  Now depending on how he bounces back then I’ll be ready to hop on the “he’s breaking down” boat 
    • remember when cardi b endorsed bernie and the replies were a bunch of white women going “girrrllll have you heard about kamala/warren”
    • I feel where you are coming from, and tbh I'm not sure I want Cam running into lb's much anymore, the man is 30, but part of what you acheive when your qb is a threat to run the ball is to force the defense to defend 11 men instead of 10. That was the appeal of the wildcat when it was briefly popular before defenses figured it out. If you take the qb out of the equation as dead weight on a running play, it makes it that much tougher on the defense. By the same token, if your qb is a viable threat to run the ball effectively, he must be accounted for even if he doesn't carry it every time. What I would *really* like to see if Cam comes back healthy is some short yardage misdirection options maybe utilizing 2 rb's, or Armah, CMC and Cam, where out of one formation we can show multiple options using those 3 guys to attack the line of scrimmage at different points and leave defenses guessing where the ball is coming from in who's hands. That is where you get into some really fun stuff over time where the other team sees you do it one way on film, so next time you break out a different option out of the same formation, then a third, etc etc. Keeps em guessing.
  • Masters of PIE !

×
×
  • Create New...