Mr. Scot

Pitt OG Matt Rotherham too.

Add Oklahoma DT Jordan Phillips to that list.

Kinda hard to put meaning to that absent true context though. You'd really need to examine the same stats for several other teams to get a framework. And then you'd wanna compare records, etc etc Stats in a vacuum aren't really telling.

Here's the important thing to me... I've seen offenses be successful even when one of their top two receivers had a case of the dropsies. Both of your starters having inconsistent hands though? That's a really difficult handicap to overcome. I know everyone is all hyped up on speed right now (so to speak) but if I'm looking for a guy to complement Kelvin Benjamin, my key factor is that he have the best hands available. Ideally, you get both speed and hands, but if I'm absolutely forced to take a little less of one or the other, I'm skimping on speed. Like I've said before, doesn't matter how damn fast you run to a spot if you don't catch the ball when you get there.

Can you prove conclusively that he isn't? Is there any true, hard evidence that Mark Davis existed before a few years ago?

Which is why I'm happy our FO prefers game tape. I've seen plenty of teams make bad draft picks because somebody looked great working out in shorts.

Pretty sure anyone can guess my answer.

More former Panther news... John Fox says Jay Cutler will have to beat out Jimmy Clausen for the QB job

I've spent plenty of time watching tackles, and I'm not a huge fan of Martin. But that said, i still like this move. Again, low risk, high reward.

From Rotoworld, citing the Saint Paul Pioneer Press... Anyone shocked?

And you may want to re-read those words again. Just to be clear, I've never been of the notion that my opinion is the only one that matters. There are plenty of smart posters here. I am of the notion that your opinion, however, is dumb, and your posting history is proof of that.

How have the Saints done since caving on that? (yeah, that's a team I wanna emulate) And Revis? You mean the guy that changes teams annually? And if you're citing Larry Johnson as a success story...well, you might wanna look up how that story ended. Since I seriously doubt you actually had any knowledge of these stories, I'm guessing you just googled NFL holdouts. Quick tip, kid: Random googling is a tactic for the uninformed, and s sure way to prove to everyone that you don't know what you're talking about. (but then, having read your prior posts, I'm pretty sure most of us already knew that)

Could add another second rounder if they sign Ijalana.

Voth generally cites PFF with a "for what it's worth" disclaimer. It's pretty difficult to put stats to an OL. I prefer the eyeball test.

Santa Claus wishes he could see as much as Aaron Wilson does. And I agree.

Good analysis. They're checking out another guy too (visited yesterday).

I'm not a big fan, but they do at least know more about football than you do. This is a good, low risk, high reward signing.

The clarification was unnecessary. He understood what you meant. What he was doing with his post was telling you that what you said was stupid. (and he was right)

He graded better than Byron Bell did.

And you apologized, which was cool.

I agree compliantly.

That's my line, but you probably already thought of that

I thought of it first

Sounds like an advertising slogan. Ask Igo if The Huddle needs a new tagline.

Lord have mercy, there's a boatload of 'dumb' in this thread