panthers320

I posted this in another thread but people might really need to tone down their expectations of what we would get back https://nfltraderumors.co/nfc-notes-buccaneers-brian-burns-panthers/

https://nfltraderumors.co/nfc-notes-buccaneers-brian-burns-panthers/ Gone are the days of the Rams offering 2 1st...

to sexually harass the person you brought in to talk about sexual harassment is on another level

I think he will always be middle of the pack at best there. Looking back to his last year at Baylor he went 0-3 vs ranked teams and won 5 games by 1 score. The big 10 is a lot better than the big 12 especially when they get rid of the east/west divisions next year. there is no way he is going to consisently beat Ohio St/Michigan/Penn St

threw an INT in the red zone at the end of the 1st half and then failed miserablly in the last 2 minutes of the 2nd half...hmm looks like they need to practice red zone and 2 minute drills. he clearly hasnt learned anything

Here is a list of WR FA from this year. Remember Hopkins wasnt released until after the draft too so he wasnt available at the start of FA. Not many great options out there. I still like Chark based on contract/potential even if he misses a few games.

So who should we have signed as a free agent instead?

WR by committee was always the plan. Stud WR1's dont sign 1 yr $5mm deals.

alright hear me out, lets sign him and Okwuegbunam and Kuntz plus keep our 5 TEs. Then we would just need 2 more TEs before we are set. We can run 10 TEs and Bryce out there....Super Bowl!!!

6 of them were in the 5-7th round where the odds of finding a quality player are much lower. but we still should have hit on at least 1 or 2 of them

What about the Choosen Anderson trade???? He clearly won that. Getting anything at all for him was a win. He convinced the Dolphins to give up a 7th rounder for Greg Little And while he swung and missed on Bridgewater he got a 6th round pick for him (better than nothing)

I just looked it up and they were 2-2

So 15 over and 15 under, assuming they were roughly equal amounts on each team O/U Vegas made a killing. They dont care that they were "wrong" by 2+ games on any given team all they care about is there is equal money on both sides. Vegas does not care who wins and losses (unless there is unequal money on one side which happens since it is almost impossible to get the exact equal money on both sides) They just put out numbers where they think equal money will be on both sides not what they think will happen.

Vegas doesnt use facts and the only metric they use is money. their goal is to have equal number of people on the over and the under so they can collect the vig. They set a line not based on facts or what they think will happen but on what they think other people will think will happen. So at 7.5 Vegas thinks there will be an equal number of people who think the Panthers will win 8 or more games as they do people who think they will win 7 or fewers games.

Remember the year the Lions went 0-16, they were 4-0 in the preseason.