Mr. Scot

I'd agree

Courtesy of an X user (and posted primarily for amusement) I'm not enough of a homer to go along with this particular suggestion just yet

I gained a lot of confidence in our OL coaching.

Don't think anyone doubts that, at least not that I've seen.

Only 26 but coming off a big injury issue makes a difference. I remember how good he was, but the question will be how good he still can be.

I could live with it, but if we continue winning (which is a good thing) then it becomes highly unlikely.

Happy to hear this...

I don't trust him either, but I can hope.

A future Contract, which in this context is purely hypothetical.

Still hoping Tepper keeps his word. (winning increases the odds)

I get the idea. I'm just not sure how that plays out in a real world negotiation when agents and egos get involved.

Kaye:

A lot of older corners make that sort of change to lengthen their careers. Whether or not Samuel is open to it? Haven't seen anything...

See above. I would say that I have a hard time imagining the Panthers throwing that kind of money at him. But ya never know...

It's a weird dilemma, similar to the numerous tanking debates we've had on here. If he continues to win, I would expect he'll at least get the fifth year option. Do I think there are gonna be better prospects available to us? Yeah, I do. But how do you justify making that sort of change if we're winning?

That's my question too

Giving him no credit at all for his part in winning the game is dumber.

Nah. Bryce is better than Clausen. He's at least capable of being a good backup. Clausen wasn't even that.

I don't think asking him to win with basically no support is a fair test for any quarterback. Hell, even a physical specimen like Newton... I've said already, by my definition (and those vary) Bryce is not a franchise quarterback. But if he continues to win games, it's definitely possible he could be thrust into that role. That's what I think scares the hell out of some people.

Accurate take... The whole "we won in spite of our starting quarterback" line is just dumb. Hell, people used to do that with Delhomme too. Reality is you either do enough to win or you don't. This past Sunday, he did. Honestly, at this point I think we have some folks (especially some of the old Cam bros) who are so scared of Young succeeding that they'll try and deny anything good about him. It's silly and it's useless, but I guess some guys can't help themselves. I don't think Young is the future, but that doesn't make it valid to try and discredit anything good he does. It just makes you look goofy.

You spent a fair amount of time and effort telling me he was

That's funny

We do have Etienne as a third. If we wanna go that route (and given the makeup of most current NFL defenses, there's logic to it) we'll need to keep a big, bulldozing offensive line in place to open enough holes to get them to the second level where they'll be facing run friendly matchups. The good news there is we already have several elements in place to make that work.

No argument... I always say anything is possible but the path to that destination is just about unnavigable.

We attended the previous two years Cowboy games, both of which were dominant wins by Dallas. Last year, I was sick as a dog. She just about had to carry me to the game The year before? Our seats were surrounded by obnoxious Cowboy fans. If I had the choice, I'd relive last year's before the other. Feeling half dead still beats being stuck in the middle of a bunch of Dallas fans 🫩