Mr. Scot

Fitterer has a long stated preference for the "draft and develop" route so he's being consistent. According to Person, the Panthers interest in Carr was driven primarily by Frank Reich. Fitterer was agreeable to it but didn't want to overspend. I said all along I was okay either way but the positive part of this decision for me is that it shows we're not "desperate" as some have described us to be.

That sounds like typical Saints math.

Pretty sure that guy's just a fan. No one else is reporting this so I don't know that I'd take it seriously.

And commentary...

Additional info...

News on an old friend...

And lost to Steve Wilks with half a coaching staff

Correct.

People get laughed at because they get things embarrassingly wrong. This person hasn't been wrong at all, and they've provided plenty of good info that wasn't found anywhere else. For the record, so did The Crown and the Claw.

This is apparently too much to ask.

Oy Here's hoping they get that not everyone here acts like this.

Breer confirms...

You mean deciding to play for somebody else doesn't automatically mean a free agent sucks?

Correct, and reasonable, which unfortunately seems to not be the norm on here. Gee, I wonder why Insiders run off

It is when they weren't. That's not what they meant.

Three or four different sources have said that, Person being one of them.

Yeah, don't get unpinning this. Unpinning the Combine discussion threads makes sense but this one's still relevant.

I'd agree that was cringeworthy. You just have to hope that's a little bit of youthful unwiseness.

People who lie about having inside information don't tend to be able to predict things correctly. This one has yet to be wrong about anything. The first one who came along was wrong about one thing but they admitted that was their own speculation and it was understandable. Most of us were smart enough not to be asses about it, but you do you...

The Jets were also highly interested but didn't make a trade offer. The reason they didn't is because they knew the Raiders would have to release him to avoid guaranteeing his contract. Again, is that too rational?

Yeah, I wouldn't have wanted to do that much.

Well generally speaking, I'd say questioning the validity of someone's statements based not on their accuracy but on whether they agree with your opinion is a sign someone isn't terribly bright. But hey, that's just me

And play again for the same coach he initially played for in Las Vegas. (or Is that too rational to consider?)