Mr. Scot

Pathetically. Wouldn't bet on it, but to his credit, at least he hasn't been banned and come back under numerous alt IDs.

Nobody's that concerned with you, dude. You're a source of amusement. (self-important people typically are)

It'll likely be posted on the Panthers YouTube channel later.

Well between the irony (and hypocrisy) of posts like this, the fun of watching you tie yourself in knots and the sheer hilarity of you seeming to believe people are concerned over your opinion, I'm too entertained to care that much But feel free to continue if you think it'll make a difference to anybody.

Laughing even harder now

Well, I know I'm laughing

As you might expect, not necessarily a huge amount of "meat" in here, but a few interesting comments about particular players (Corral in particular) and the way McAdoo goes about installing his scheme.

Well, sometimes it fits. Like say, when you have someone who spends all of their time talking about other people's posts instead of talking about, you know, football. That guy is especially pathetic.

Could be worse... Imagine someone who keeps coming back and making new IDs on message boards where they've been repeatedly banned. That guy would be pretty pathetic

I'm not really concerned with how much money Olsen is making. I'd just much rather listen to Olsen than Tom Brady.

I keep expecting to hear a cheesy announcer guy go "But wait...there's more"

I haven't seen what the latest allegations against Watson are, but his defense team apparently responded pretty angrily.

I'd forgotten about that. And yeah, reports are they have zero interest in playing him.

Is his contract guaranteed? If so, he gets to send a massive "FU" to the Browns for replacing him.

Fair point. Could Rivera be Panthers Mid-Atlantic?

Probably do the same thing this year...

What exactly do you expect them to do? You want them to make stone cold, lead pipe lock predictions? Why? Just so a team or a player or an agent can change their mind? (that happens pretty regularly in the real world, ya know) Sorry to disappoint you but beat writers and analysts can't foresee the future. All they can do is report what they know right now. Not sure why that's a problem, but apparently it's a big deal. For me though, I say if something might or might not happen, why not just say that?

If I don't mention it, does that mean it didn't happen? Mind you, it doesn't necessarily mean anything.

Meanwhile, a minor update regarding that other Browns quarterback... Again, glad it's not our problem.

Apparently we're applying Old Testament rules for testing prophets.

Her article was dated April 16th. The Panthers and Browns we're reported to be negotiating as of Draft days 1 and 2 (April 28th and 29th). Where was she wrong again?

Well, at least until Brady retires

Ive always been a bigger fan of the logo than the uniforms, honestly. When it first appeared, I thought the logo looked cool. Thought the redesign made it look even better. Uniform wise? Outside of the helmets and fonts, most pro football uniforms follow a fairly standard formula.

Can you quote exactly where she said a trade was on the verge of happening or were those your words? Having "the inside track" isn't the same as something being "on the verge of happening".