Jump to content

kungfoodude

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    29,230

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by kungfoodude

  1. kungfoodude
    I swear, the dumb college homers in this forum are cancerous around draft time.
  2. kungfoodude
    I mean Noel and Fannin Jr. could easily be two of our top 3 receivers on day one.
  3. kungfoodude
    It's lightsaber training.
  4. kungfoodude
    Not realistic, IMO. I would be floored with this draft.
  5. kungfoodude
    I agree. It's really the principle that we got upset about for the Burns trade, less so the ignorant horseshit we would have used it on. I do think there was likely no team in the NFL willing to give up a 1st for CMC at that time.
  6. kungfoodude
    Yeah, we actually got quite a haul for CMC. It's just that we squandered 100% of the resources we received in return.
  7. kungfoodude
    Plus they are likely to win the trade very decisively.
  8. kungfoodude
    I haven't seen much in the way of panic moves from them. They are a smart and well run organization, so it often looks alien to us.
  9. kungfoodude
    ESPN said similar.
  10. kungfoodude
    TBH, I would rather be picking below 15 than in the 6-15 range.
  11. kungfoodude
    They are lacking a 2nd round pick for 2025 due to the Metcalf trade so I would assume the minimum to even be in any discussion would have to involve their 2026 1st. Which, TBH, they would be foolish to trade away.
  12. kungfoodude
    Yeah, I am not giving up on him yet but I do think we need to see a pretty big step up this season to be convinced he is a long term solution. It is a shame that his development seemed to be stunted in 2023.
  13. kungfoodude
    Eh....average or below average mostly. Using PFF, BC: 63.6 (23rd of 40) Mays: 66.1 (13th of 40) Corbett: 62.2
  14. kungfoodude
    I don't think you sit a top 10 OT for a year. I would assume someone is getting moved if they make that decision.
  15. kungfoodude
    I would say center is a weak link, for sure. Unless we draft a guy.
  16. kungfoodude
    Fair point. Hence why as upset as people were about a theoretical trade for Higgins, at least it would have removed us from likely fuging up another WR evaluation again.
  17. kungfoodude
  18. kungfoodude
    It's interesting to see this poll so closely. I honestly figured most were pessimistic about the odds of this.
  19. kungfoodude
    I would be fuging floored if we did that deal.
  20. kungfoodude
    Yeah, we focus on gambling on these project #1 WR types versus the obviously better and more productive players.
  21. kungfoodude
    I somewhat suspect the trading action from 11-20 will be considerably more than 1-10.
  22. kungfoodude
    To be clear, this could be up or down. Just want to see what the Huddle thinks we will actually end up doing on Thursday.
  23. kungfoodude
    Yeah, this WR class has some very good candidates to be productive NFL WR's, if not many candidates to be NFL stars. Currently, the only truly consistent and productive WR we have had since the Moore trade is AT. One would think we would eventually attempt to remedy that.
  24. kungfoodude
    But what you are describing is being a petty bitch, even if that were true. Again, making him the smaller man. All scenarios here are that Daboll is the asshole. Literally 100%
  25. kungfoodude
    I am not sure really the scenario where that isn't an insane D-bag move. I cannot imagine why anyone would want to play for him after that.
×
×
  • Create New...