kungfoodude

Yeah, that's why I roll my eyes so hard when people throw out Allen with the Fields or AR situations. That is such an extreme outlier that there are few that rival them. One could certainly make an argument for Lamar Jackson(57% career passer in college) but I think some of that was scheme at Louisville.

Oh, 100%. There is no logical reason we shouldn't have won that trade, given what we received in return. But....Fitterermagic prevailed and it was all squandered.

I suspect it has a lot more to do with him just not doing the work. He should have stayed in college for a couple of more seasons.

Remember that Khalil Mack was traded for 2 firsts and some change at the end of his rookie deal to the Bears. The Bears ultimately won the trade as Mack was a continuous PB/AP player and the Raiders squandered all the draft capital on players worth far less. It's dumb to turn down that kind of haul, but it's definitely not hard to completely squander.

I do also want to point out that people STILL believe in Justin Fields despite the unbelievable amount of evidence he is completely incapable of being more than a gimmick, run first, check down QB. It is flabbergasting the amount of chances some of these busts get.

He will never be able to make it as an NFL QB. Maybe if he played some special teams and could catch he could be a poor man's Taysom Hill but that is about the extent of his ceiling. More likely than not, he will probably be permanently out of the NFL in 3-4 years.

Oh yeah, going back a decade plus.

I mean, we are mere weeks from knowing. We will see how this terrifying tale ends soon enough.

That's why I keep saying they don't REALLY have any desire to get rid of him anytime soon. If they did, they wouldn't be making these absurd demands in a trade.

I think I abandoned most of those years ago. Hotmail, yahoo, etc. Too many security leaks.

The point being if AT is the most effective, he should play. By all means, hopefully the young guys beat him out but until that happens, I don't think throwing the whole offense into the hands of a largely unproven and inexperienced group is necessarily the best idea for anyone's development. Ultimately, that's the FO and coaches decision, for better or worse. They seem to be wanting to stick with AT for at least one more year.

I legit still know people that use hotmail for some reason. Blows my mind.

Nah, it is about Bryce. That is the most significant thing going on with the franchise by a massive margin. Followed probably by Ikey and maybe Horn. XL being a bust, doesn't matter. TMac not working out, that would matter but it's year 1. Bryce has such a massive impact on the future plans of this franchise, he is overwhelmingly the most important factor.

We don't have an 8th in 2028. That is the last remaining pick we owe Chicago for the Bryce Young deal.

Happened last offseason too. It's just part of it. Hell, we had CMC, Donte Jackson and D. Brown all basically have that happen after inking big deals.

I asked a 20something at the office if they knew what a Compuserve, AOL or NetZero trial CD was last week. Blank stare.

I saw the post a few days ago. I think the TB WR was top 15 too. I said my piece about it. It's completely insane to be banking a high WR pick on TMac with him both being a rookie and the offensive situation being what it is in Carolina. As a fan, I wouldn't touch that poo until the top 20 WR's. That risk/reward scale makes it very suspect.

I just don't think fans are being realistic with all these trade scenarios. We have perhaps 7-8 players on the entire roster anyone would trade for more than a 6th/conditional 6th rounder. Not everyone in the NFL is going to hand out Mingo type deals. And of the minimal amount of players we are talking, almost all of them are far bigger negative impacts to our roster or cap than they would net results in return.

I don't think people realize that he does not have much value to almost any other team that would consider trading for him.

I don't necessarily disagree on the reps but technically the most important overall evaluation aid he is performing relates to Young. In the case that TMac flounders, XL doesn't develop and Coker turns out to be ceiling limited, he did have very good chemistry with Bryce. Now, I am obviously describing worst case scenario but AT does have a role at the moment for that reason alone. If he declines and someone else on the roster bumps him down, by all means, put him on the bench. So, outside of a "mentor" and "Bryce Young safety blanket" role, I completely agree we should have not resigned him. But that decision was also made in a world minus two of the WR's we drafted.

This is absurd. Why would they trade for him at a $2 mil higher price tag than his last season in MIN? I think people really need to avail themselves of the notion(as I stated all of last season) that AT is a tradeable asset. He is a 35 year old WR with a $6.25 mil base salary price.

I am replying based on Huddle input, if you read the full message. We can put a poll up for expected production/results. Might be interesting to check back on towards the end of the season.

I don't think the expectations on TMac are as high as you think. TBH, we saw higher expectations for XL in year 1 than TMac, based on the Huddle input, anyway. A lot of both of their production is going to be tied to Bryce anyway. I suspect that if Bryce doesn't take a big leap, 80% of the ire is going to be directed at him rather than any specific WR.

All the more reason for athletes to get off social media. Anyone famous that is checking comments or reading DM's on social media is just voluntarily wading into an overflowing sewer.

100%. There are rarely, if ever, PS signings that turn into much more than temporary depth pieces. The examples of these are extreme outliers if you look at a season NFL roster transactions log.