Jump to content

ForJimmy

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    20,815

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ForJimmy

  1. ForJimmy
    The Steelers have a strong enough team to be competitive with Mitch as a stop gap. Hell they won several with Rudolph. We don’t want a rookie learning from Sam and being developed by Rhule and Co…
  2. ForJimmy
    I’d assume that would be for a development player like Willis. He can sit behind Mitch and slowly be developed into their franchise QB. Something we are not equipped to do…
  3. ForJimmy
    You are talking to Sizzle who says there is no way Watson forces a trade, Wilson won’t get traded, and Rodgers won’t get his way. He is either a troll account or has the absolute worst takes I’ve ever seen. He also thinks Tepper is a great owner… *insert emojis*
  4. ForJimmy
    What about QBs that the franchise give up 3 first round picks to trade up and draft their replacement because they know QB is the biggest weakness on the roster and then put them on the trade block in which there id little interest from other teams?
  5. ForJimmy
    He will be there at 6. I’ve seen him ranked in the 20s by some.
  6. ForJimmy
    True and fair point. I hope as our roster is getting more complete we won’t be overhauling FAs every offseason.
  7. ForJimmy
    That guy is I obsessed with Watson. He can’t make a post without bringing him up…
  8. ForJimmy
    He has a stronger arm than Darnold, maybe not as mobile, but I agree with the other two. He won a lot in college and has won in the NFL. There are definitely worse options like Jimmy G…
  9. ForJimmy
    Yeah I was thinking that. Baker would instantly be one of the more talented QBs the Panthers have had. I don’t think we are going to be able to unload Sam and his contract without giving up picks, so I’d just roll with him as the backup (if we acquire Baker). Maybe draft a project like Glass in the late rounds or sign undrafted and cut PJ. Baker with Sam as the backup and Glass as the 3rd/project/practice squad. Who knows maybe Darnold plays well enough to be a decent backup (although very overpriced) behind a better OL.
  10. ForJimmy
  11. ForJimmy
    If we do that means he played well again and we got a starting QB. If we don’t then we should get a comp pick. We could also tag/trade him to another team if he puts up good numbers. Put it this way, if we acquire him and he plays well we will have several options and be in better shape than we are with $18 million dollar Darnold…
  12. ForJimmy
    I don’t think this will be Sam Darnold level. For one Baker has proven he can play when healthy, which is something Sam never did. It’s also been mentioned that the Browns will pay a portion of his salary. I also don’t think we will trade as high of picks like we did for Sam. If it’s next year’s 3rd/4th and they eat half his salary we should come our way better than we did with the Darnold trade. A better QB for less money/less draft picks. If we grab a LT at 6 he will be (on paper) a solid OL to play behind. It’s definitely not my first choice, but there are much worse things they can do.
  13. ForJimmy
    I think Baker isn’t as much as their “trash” as they had a very rare opportunity to get a top 5 QB. Had the Watson thing never happened they would be rolling with healthy Baker next year and happy about it. I think all but maybe 7/8 teams would want to upgrade with Watson. The Browns were dumb enough to pay that much for him especially with the legal issues. He played hurt and got his feelings hurt which is killing his stock right now. Plus this happened when most teams were set at QB.
  14. ForJimmy
    I think healthy Baker is as good.
  15. ForJimmy
    The Baker situation doesn’t seem as bad as other failed QBs we tried in Carolina. Baker would still be a Brown except they had an extremely rare opportunity to acquire a top young QB in the league. He just helped the Browns get into the playoffs 2 years ago when he was healthy. The Niners traded 3 firsts to draft an unknown in Lance because they knew QB was their weakness. Trading for a proven top young QB that you didn’t think you had a chance to acquire until the last minute doesn’t really make Baker a true “castoff” like Jimmy G, Darnold, and Teddy IMO.
  16. ForJimmy
    I think they go to rehab after playing for us…
  17. ForJimmy
    He would like it.
  18. ForJimmy
    What if we use whatever pick we get for him to trade for Baker providing the Browns eat a chunk of his salary?
  19. ForJimmy
    Baker for next year’s 4th and they eat most of his salary. We can send them Robbie’s whiney ass too or trade him away for a pick and sign Jarvis Landry. Draft a LT at 6 and we should look much better on offense.
  20. ForJimmy
    Small school OL worry me. I know Moton was one, but they are typically going 1vs1 against smaller prospects making it hard to project them.
  21. ForJimmy
    I’d take Baker over Jimmy providing Cleveland eats most of his contract.
  22. ForJimmy
    Let’s trade for Nick Foles. Super MVP Elite!!
  23. ForJimmy
    There is one theory they don’t want to be stuck in the middle constantly out of reach for the next top QB. Similar to the Colts lately, but you can always trade up and grab one, it’s just very pricey (see the Niners for Lance).
  24. ForJimmy
    To tank for next year’s QB class. I don’t agree with it, but that’s been his plan the whole time.
  25. ForJimmy
    The years he was on the roster are pretty misleading. He is a mid level QB. Their backup is obviously worse, so when the starter gets hurt (which apparently he does a lot), the team is going to be worse. If he was such a difference maker Kyle and Lynch wouldn’t have traded 3 first round picks to move up and grab Lance so they can replace him. If he was such a difference maker there would be a bidding war like their was for Watson. So he will get traded one of the last teams standing for lower picks because he is just a mid level injury prone QB…
×
×
  • Create New...