mrcompletely11

dude............

of course we wanted to trade down, for the right deal, dont be silly If the cowboys jumping us to 7 for tmac was the sole reason to have this smokescreen then thats pretty silly, dude you are bit blinded out the level of prospect he is. As many have noted he would have been the wr 5/6 in last years draft. He benefited greatly in timing.

Sure but in a draft where there wasnt a bonafide star (at least at 8 ) it wouldnt hurt to throw out the scent that tmac may be a possibility as well to see if you could get even more trade offers.

Playing devils adovcate here, but if you truly wanted to trade down then it made no sense to be a smoke screen for Walker only. Especially since Tmac is not a generational type player. Make it known that he is in play and see if the cowboys or whoever really like him as rumored.

They are the best in bed

The good news is the overall 2026 class looks to be absolutely loaded https://www.theringer.com/2025/04/29/nfl-draft/26-best-prospects-2026-nfl-draft-arch-manning-garrett-nussmeier

sure but there are 100 other plays where he looks lost

he hails from philly where you have to ask edgy questions to stand out. I ve told my Soronsen story a 100x times on here and I am still repulsed this is the mindset of the old school observer reporters enjoy I've told this story on here before but in in the early 2000's after a panther game my friends and I ran into Tom Sorenson of the Charlotte Observer at the southend brewery. He sat with us for a while and at some point he was asked directly about why the CO wasnt more critical of Jerry Richardson. He basically said Charlotte is a nice quiet southern town and the people here didnt want those types of stories or those types of reporters/columnists that cause drama. I am obviously paraphrasing but we asked about why the paper wasnt going after shinn and the hornets harder as well when he was going through his troubles and all the crappy moves they made. He just said there is not an audience for that. We argued and argued and he just didnt understand. Maybe he was playing dumb but I remember being incredulous at the time that the people in the media thought that asking hard questions would turn off readers

thats kindof the point, he doesnt

Mike Kaye has been questioning this since training camp. God bless him for actually writing this. "Legette might be the most awkward running wide receiver we've seen in a long time. He gallops down the field like he has pebbles in his cleats but fire in his heart. He is deceptively quick, but weirdly off-balance."

mike kaye has some bite, the others not so much. Really disappointed in Ellis as he was a bulldog but once he got credentials he became a cuck

Id take that for a rookie

a bit underwhelming but a start I guess. But you said you would not be upset with pittmans numbers. So what would you think he tet came in at 500 yards and 1 td?

Not sure you can call it a steal as they got a good potentially great player with that pick

I have been a critic of morgan but for this draft at least it seemed he understood the value of pics and trading a bit better then last year

I mean not really there are expectations on players based on where they are drafted. For example a player in the top 10 should be an immediate contributing starter. Thats universally understood

If tmac only has 2 1000 yard seasons and never tops more then 6 tds in 5 years then he is a bust all things considered. If his stats mirror pittman as your post suggests then we should be upset.

My dad called it "reading the room"

Pittman was a 2nd round pick. If our 8 overall pick just produced that, then there is a problem

Not if we got a future first.

For what?

All those points are taken for sure, but its year 3 and he has won a grand total of 5 games. I think what they are saying, all things considered, he has to make the jump into the top 10 of qb play for the entire year. Nobody is diminishing what he did at the end of the year but now its put up or shut up time.

"YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"