micnificent28

Lance Earned a starting job on a good 49ers team that had jimmy G a proven vet. Corral couldnt earn reps over Walker a meh sam and a bad cast off from cleveland. Corral was a 3rd talent and lance a 1st round talent in a good qb class.

the guy played what 1 game in the rain and hes a bust? I'm glad a lot of you arent the decision makers over here. Yall are daying Matt Corral has shown more which is the ecscf opposite of whats true here. Lance has the tools. size running ability big are i would love to aquire for a 2 and maybe a little more.

i like it. i think he has more upside than anyone in this draft. if we cant land one of the top-2 or 3 and they want to move him for say a 2. im down.

i think this is it for ole sammy Ball game.

Not going to get into the RB speculation, but his name is worthy of praise and added to this thread. He seems to me to have done nothing bur deliver when called apon. Even tho the sample size is small he has been worth the price of admission. At worst hes wr 3-4 on this team i would love to see him get more opportunities.

agreed 100%

the Rams dont have a first round pick this year so why does that get brought up at all. and has nothing to do with wilks.

I think hes worth atleast a first. The problem with 2 first is that 1 of those picks has to go into replacing him. you wont get both picks the same year. the other 2 probably go into trading up for a qb. I dont love this qb class. I feel sitting ar 8-10 levis or stroud will be there at worse case AR-15. Trading a young pro bowler who has proven he can get 12 sacks a year and still getting better for a unknown commodity is a risk. 2 first and a second is a bounty i get it. On paper it is definitely the winning side but its also a risk.

you can do that without losing the second most important position in the game. you got a haul for CMC your already picking top 10. should be very doable.

He isnt a run stopper. He isnt even really a defense end. your comparing him to guys who are 270-280. hes honestly a 3-4 edge and thats what he projected to be. is that his fault you use him at end to stop the run? no. athleticism is always valuable. 1 trick or not its a damn good trick. Maybe there are 20 guys in the league with double digit sacks but thats 20 out of 32 teams including defensive tackles thats rare

This Burns should have been traded crap is nonsense to me. first off guy isnt 25 yet. Guys that can get you 10 sacks a year dont grow on trees. those that do demand a high price. Look at how Reddick was out of our price range after his double digit season here. Second yes hes a one dimensional speed rusher. If the spin or speed rush doesnt work he doesnt have a good bull rush. Yet he is Long long arms great elite flexibilty and 4.5 speed at the edge which is rare. not to many qbs running away from burns. if a qb breaks outside the pocket i know my edge can chase him down. And hes fast enough to play in coverage if needed. If u do accept that trade you not getting a pick this year. and Alteast one of those picks is going to replace him and you have to hope he is as good a pass rusher. What if you miss? you stuck trying to find a guy who can put pressure on the edge which to me defeats the purpose of trading him in the first place. If the rams thought he was worth 2 first and a second that shows you how valued he is by other teams. Stop looking at the league with panther colored goggles and look at what the league sees.

would you be upset if he was the choice by tepper anyway at head coach?

I think wilks is a fine coach. He's not a bad choice for the next head coach at all. The guy was making wine out of shyt. I mean this team was dead last with rhule at the helm and he made us playoff contenders. Thats without his own coaching staff or players or qb. Do i want him back next year...IDK i had my heart set on some offensive guru. im sick of struggling to put up points and pouring entire draft classes into a defense that inevitably fails. I think I want to go with the Chargers model at this point.

is he currently? was he last year? is he in the top 10 of anything? like what does that mean? Josh Norman was a pro bowler at one point in time as well.

you know the huddle is the only place u can find where random nuts rant ane complain about the teams lone pro bowler and complain about how hes average.

gross

Skip Bayless is going to go nuclear today with this one.

this

hes a JaG

What argument have u made? you have made a completely dumb argument about letting a top 10 pass rusher walk for a complimentary 3 RD pick! we were offered 2 first and a second and your saying it would be better to let him go for a borderline 4th rounder...i mean my god..

still trolling sigh... why do u do this...

lol im done after this.

Nobody is saying hes excellent against the run which PFF clearly accounts for. But that doesnt take away from what we are paying him to do and thats rush the passer. He's clearly a top 10 threat at that positions as a pass rusher so thats why hes getting paid.

Because what you aren't acounting for is the cap goes up every year. the next contract will be bigger than the one before. If there is more money the next pro bowler gonna wanna be paid higher than the guy who last got the deal. Garrett will get a bigger deal if they signed on the same day but it doesnt work that way. Yes it matters where they are drafted because of a variety of factors. Say the year Burns came out that was an extremely good year for pass rusher. you had Bosa, Josh Allen, Farrell, rashawn Gary and then Burns followed by Sweat at 26. That class of pass rushers is very rare some years you might get 2 first round ends. so where your picking matters if your gonna land those type of talents.

At this point hes the face of the defense if not the team. He's young, on his way to a second pro bowl, that Spider-Man thing is highly marketable and hes arguably the heart and soul of the D. He clearly cares and does more good than bad by a good margin to me.