tukafan21

And the strategy, or more accurate word, hope, of strong minded individuals is to want your team to show fight and be competitive in all the games, but still end up losing all of them in the end to help your draft pick. That's VERY different than tanking and trying to lose. If you think winning a couple extra games at the end of a season like this is going to be the tipping point for Free Agents to want to come here vs not coming here, then I have some beachfront property to sell you in Arizona. A team can show progress and fight, but still lose games, which is what a true fan should be hoping for right now. I've never understood how "real" fans can say, "yea I hope we win these couple games, in a completely lost season, to feel good for a few hours, at the detriment to helping my team win consistently for the next decade" Because in the NFL, picking 5 spots later, even still in the Top 10, can have a MASSIVE ripple affect for years later. Just look at us a few years back, if we were 1 pick earlier in 2020, we could have ended up with Justin Herbert and had an offense of Herbert, CMC, and DJ. Sure, I know we didn't win a bunch of games down the stretch in 2019 to hurt our pick that year, but it just proves that at the top end of the draft, every draft slot can have massive ripple affects because of the type of talent that you can get there at such key positions.

Example #1,294 of you not actually reading my posts before you respond to them. Me: "I think we're going to win 1 more game at most, end up in the 4-6 pick range, and hope a couple QB's go and then will come down to team needs if T-Mac falls to us" You: "Maybe if we get back in the top 10, you say he's the best prospect in the draft, so how would he be available at #10" MY DUDE.... I literally just said I think we're getting back in the Top 5 range and then said how I'd hope we still land him, so what's the point of saying "how it stands today" as I obviously know that. In regards to the specific teams you called out... New Orleans has Olave and Shaheed who was looking really good before getting hurt, and they will want to move on from Carr. Given their cap issues moving forward, they aren't investing a high first round pick in WR given those two they already have, I think they'd be a QB draft pick team, and that's if they're before us, they have a bunch of winnable games left. Cleveland could use a WR after trading Cooper of course, but I think they want to move on from the Watson saga so badly that if they can draft one of the QB's, they would as well. Jacksonville could concern me a little because they could want to give Lawrence another elite weapon, but they also have OL issues I believe and could see them going that route to protect him instead. They also end with 5 straight very winnable games, so not sure they're going to be picking ahead of us anyways. New England is the team in your list that would scare me the most, as they badly need a true #1 WR for Maye, and they have a rough schedule ahed of them. I'd just have to hope they go the Hunter route, which given their HC being a former defensive player, I could very well see them go that way. Would be fitting though if he ends up there, two best players in school history end up as Patriots legends with him and Gronk (not to mention Teddy Bruschi was a Wildcat as well lol). After those teams.... Tennessee scares me a lot too as I think if they want to give Levis another season, T-Mac would be a great weapon for them to pair with Ridley and see what he can do with his big arm. Same goes for the Raiders if they were to not get a QB themselves, as they have a clear need there now that they traded Adams. Zero concern about the Jets or Dolphins taking a WR with the ones they have and their other issues, same goes for the Giants as they'd take a QB and I don't see them taking two WR's in the top 10 back to back years if they were to not take a QB. So yea, if we stay at 10, we're not getting him, but if we are in that 4-6 range, very decent chance there could be 2 QB's, maybe an OL or Hunter, maybe a pass rusher if it's a team like the Jets who have WRs. That puts him still sitting there at #6, but even that will take some luck and I think any further down and we won't be able to get him.

Look at our schedule, Cowboys are probably our only winnable game left unless we can beat the Bucs, but Evans will be back by then too. If we only win 1 more game (or none) we’ll still probably end up picking around 4-6 in the end, if a couple QB’s go in the first few picks, will come down to team needs, but I’m hoping we can still get my guy T-Mac

I have no issue with a team drafting a QB and letting them sit to learn at first. But when they had the roster they put together and then spent the money they did on Cousins, it was with the intent of contending for a SB with Cousins as the QB. That gives them a 1-3 year window for the SB, drafting Penix does NOTHING to help them win that SB, all it did was take away a legit difference maker at another position they could have used the pick with. While at the same time, eliminating their chance to utilize a rookie QB contract to save money to spend elsewhere while trying to win a SB. Again, people need to stop looking at draft picks in a vacuum, they need to look at it in regards to a franchise's roster and current goals and expectations in the coming years.

Then Brooks was the wrong pick. Again, like I said, it's not about this signing, it's about the whole picture, one of the two was bad, the pick or this signing, time will tell which was the wrong decision, but one of them was wrong. But if I were to bet on it, I'd say the contract was wrong, as if he can stay healthy, then I think Brooks is going to be a very good RB in this league for a while.

This is WAY closer to the Falcons drafting Penix after signing Cousins than the Lions drafting Gibbs after signing Montgomery. Poor allocation of assets across the full roster given where we are as a franchise and state of the roster

First, you can't compare it to the Falcons when both of those guys are still on rookie contracts. Second, you also can't compare it to the Lions because again, they already had an almost fully built out roster before that, one that was obviously ready to compete for a SB run immediately upon making that draft pick and signing last offseason That's the point, it's not about the player or contract, it's about how that does or doesn't make sense with the rest of the roster. It's not an argument against a RB committee, it's an argument against this contract given our draft pick of Brooks. Last offseason guys like Zack Moss signed for 2 years and $8 million, Derrick Henry for 2 years and $16M, Ekeler for 2 years and $11M, Gus Edwards for 2 and $6.5M, Antonio Gibson for 3 and $11M. Brooks is the future RB of this team, he has the skill set to be a 3 down back. Even if you're going with a committee, signing any guys like the above to a cheaper deal to be the compliment to Brooks is a significantly better use of money. And to your point of a $10 million pass rusher probably not being worthy of a starter... yes, you're correct. But it's more like that $10 million would be used in addition to the $5-8M that we'd be already giving to a DE, to get a legit $15+ pass rusher in FA. Give me a $15-20M pass rusher and a 5th round draft pick or cheap 1 year FA to compliment Brooks at RB over Hubbard and a below average DE who will be here for one year as a bad rental starter. People need to stop looking at every contract, draft pick, trade, signing, etc, in a vacuum. They need to start looking at the bigger picture and how all the pieces fit together, it's why we keep failing as a franchise as we keep repeating our same mistakes.

Two problems with this The first is easy, yes you do when you already drafted their replacement with the highest ranked RB in the draft class The second is also easy, and it's exactly why I was screaming for us to trade him at the deadline, so we got a draft asset in return for him instead of letting him walk for nothing.

Previous bad contracts don't make a bad one now acceptable. And there is nothing wrong with a committee, but we traded up in the 2nd round to take the widely regarded #1 RB in the draft class. You don't do that with the intent of him being a backup for his entire rookie contract, and you don't sign someone to be the 9th highest paid RB in the league to be the backup either. If we were a contending team and we could afford it, it would be different, such as with the Lions and their RB room right now. But we're not, we have SOOOOO many holes, that spending $10 million on an RB when you have someone who should be a 3 down workhouse on a cheap 2nd round rookie contract, is just a completely irresponsible use of the cap room. How can anyone be okay with spending that $10 million there as opposed to a starting DE, CB, or LB? Or if we go QB in the draft next year like so many want, that $10 million could be used towards a WR as even with Legette and what people want Coker to be, that WR room next year is looking like one of the worst in the league right now. Contracts can never be looked at in a vacuum, when you take everything into consideration, it's a terrible signing unless they already know Brooks isn't going to be THAT guy, and if that's the case, then it was a terrible draft pick. Again, one of the two decisions is terrible, we just may not know which one it is yet, but time will let us know.

So we're either paying a backup RB $10 million a year or we wasted trading up for a 2nd round pick to be the backup RB Either way it turns out, one of them was a beyond stupid decision, just lovely.

If he was a vet or had 3 years of full playing time in college, it would be different, I'd lean more on the side of caution. But this is someone who now over the last 4 years, has really only played in games for one of them as he had 51 combined carries his first two years in college. If he wants to reach his potential, he needs reps and he needs them this year, he can't miss another year without meaningful game snaps. The knee is structurally sound at this point being a year out from injury and today's tech/rehab capabilities. Sure his lack of game shape could lead to pulled muscles or something, but it's not going to put him at risk of a more serious injury to give him 10-15 carries right out of the gate. Also, we need see what he's got, to know if he's going to be able to handle a 3 down role next year before the offseason. Because if he can, then we shouldn't be re-signing Hubbard as he's earned a decent contract from someone next year. We can't give that out to a guy who will end up being a backup to someone on a rookie deal, it's a place we can save money to spend elsewhere for a few years, as we could get a much cheaper backup option in free agency or even draft someone else in like the 5th round to be his backup and really save money at the position.

Sure, I’ve been saying we needed to trade Johnson since like week 3ish It doesn’t change that we made a bad trade in the end

Even if they win it all and we have the #1 pick, it would still be about 10 picks because of the compensatory picks But it still was a terrible trade, just sayin, it’s probably going to end up about a dozen or so picks better, not that it means anything at that point in the draft anyways.

The Titans got a 5th that turns into a 4th if they make the SB for Hopkins Hopkins… Deandre freaking Hopkins LOL

We moved up like a dozen picks in the draft and paid off almost the rest of his salary this season at the same time, for probably the best WR who was left on the market this season It was an awful trade

Basically this trade is what I’d have expected to get for Johnson and the Johnson trade is what I’d have expected for Mingo So maybe just call it a wash and not be upset about the awful return we got for Johnson? lol

Also to the people who think he wants out and we should try and trade for him again. DJ = XL Sure, XL isn't to DJ's level yet of course, but it's about style of play and how they'd be used, they're both that strong physical WR who are most effective getting the ball in their hand and letting them try and make plays and break tackles. And in fact, I think XL has higher upside in that type of being used because he's a bit bigger and stronger than DJ is, so if he pans out, he'll be even more effective in that role than DJ has been, but he still has to develop and get there of course. We don't need another one of those, we need a true outside #1 to compliment Legette moving forward.

But the QB wouldn't have any way of knowing he stepped out of bounds, so if he stayed on the field, there's every possibility that Caleb would have thrown to him. Particularly as the defender would have also seen him step out, a smart defender would then just leave him to go help cover someone else, as he'd know that any pass to DJ there would lead to a penalty anyways, why bother covering him anymore and take yourself out of the play as well.

Anyone who thinks he walked off the field mid play doesn't know football, that was a very vet savvy move. He accidentally stepped out of bounds so he made sure he was nowhere near Caleb's line of sight because he couldn't catch a pass anyways. Literally saw the same thing with Hunter Henry on that wild Maye play and people were praising it, but here they think it means he's unhappy, lol

I'm hoping we trade him, as it doesn't make much sense to re-sign him, Brooks is going to be a 3 down back for us next year. In FA we can find a big bruiser to be his backup and possible short yardage back to take some pounding off Brooks, but if we expect him to pan out, there is no reason to give a FA contract to an RB who is earning a halfway decent pay day next year with his play so far this year. We are going to have the money to spend in FA that we're not going to get any comp pics back for anyone who leaves anyways, Hubbard, Clowney, and Thielen all should be moved.

So, Bryce aint that guy, he's just flat out never going to be a franchise QB Because of that, I'm in the camp of trading him right now before he plays another snap and hurts his value anymore. But the more I think about it, while I don't think it would happen, if he somehow did show improvement the rest of the year to where they decide to give him one last chance next year, even if we likely still kept losing along the way. That could give us that Top 5 pick, and if we're giving Bryce one more year, T-Mac would absolutely be the most logical draft pick we could make, as it would give him that perfect outside true #1 he hasn't had yet to see if it helps him turn a corner. If you could somehow guarantee the above scenario played out, I'd be perfectly fine watching Bryce screw up again next year if it got my guy on the Panthers for the decade following that, LOL. Having said that, he's a bum, playing him more will only hurt his stock, just trade him tomorrow morning for whatever the best offer is.

No, we need to trade him immediately while teams still want him and maybe will give up a little more because he didn't look entirely lost out there. There's no circumstance where he turns into a franchise QB, just get what we can and move on from this abysmal trade and subsequent draft pick.

You're talking about two different things though If Deion is behind his open campaigning for himself for Heisman, that wouldn't surprise me and in the end, I'd get it, they're trying to win the Heisman. But his openly talking about expecting a two-way player in the NFL, that's not going to help him, so I can't see how Deion would be telling him to do that as a marketing ploy. If he were saying things like, "I think I can be a 2 way player at the next level, but I'm going to start by focusing on one side of the ball to be the best I can be, and then if I get the opportunity to do both, I'm going to take it" then it would be helping him look better. But by just saying he expects to be a full time 2 way player, he's only hurting himself as GM's may do what I'm doing, and question what his mindset will be when he can't do both. If I'm being honest, I think Deion is actually behind making him think he can do both at the next level. Deion did it a little bit and I think part of his own ego is the thought of coaching up the next guy to try it and getting him to succeed at doing it. Talk up your NCAA two way play as a marketing ploy for the Heisman = Totally fine Talk up being a 2 way NFL player as a marketing ploy for the draft = Delusion