Jump to content

strato

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    9,320
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Information

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Panthers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

strato's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • One Year In Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

5.8k

Reputation

  1. And they mention some other guys who probably wouldn’t be first rounders or even second rounders but sound interesting. I would be hoping to identify some more of that. What he said about Conception does fit the profile of what elements I think the 3rd guy should bring. But I still think we can get that without spending yet another first round pick. Canales has some receiver roots before the QBs. Ditto Idzik. Put that poo to use and find us someone outside the obvious 1st round suspects that every average fan can see.
  2. There are enough guys with clean health/injury histories that can’t stay healthy in the NFL you don’t need to chase oft injured talent.
  3. You really do need to do that if it is a serious hobby. I don’t look any more until we draft someone then I look. Exception was 2023 because we cut our sack off for the first pick. I looked then. The horror…. I wanted my sack back but Tepper had it in his clutches.
  4. I think I saw the Rams mentioned as offering assets to trade into 8. They took TMac instead of offers. Looks like a very good decision at this point.
  5. What I came away with is he was very helpful with the ‘Will this player be there at 51?’ type of stuff. understanding the dominoes falling and generally assessing your prospects with certain players being on the board for you. Which isn’t how we probably think of analytics around here. And I am sure they also do. The stuff we think of as analytics I mean. RAS etc
  6. He has long ago ceased to offer hope he was ever worthy of the 1.1. Now it is just, can he be mid?
  7. Well, it is his to lose. They are on a path to pay him unless he really fugs up this year. Maybe we can get ourselves into a Coker/XL situation somehow, Bryce being XL in this scenario. Find ourselves a Coker.
  8. I read that but didn’t take it as an indictment. Maybe it is. Tbis is what I took heart in seeing.Actual acknowledgement of his inconsistency: "Based on our conversations, his excitement for what we have and where we are and the steps we were able to take last year," Canales said. "But also knowing that moments in different games, it wasn’t our best. Can we be at our best at all times?" D
  9. It certainly is shaping up to be a pivotal year. About effing time.
  10. Imma go with based on his exceptional greenness. There is nothing but upside. Theoretically. If he is a of above average intelligence he should be able to grow. Right now he seems to be on a Wilks type level where there isn’t any real innovation but the leadership thing is strong. There is a place for that. I want more out of him, football wise, but am not really expecting it at this point.
  11. Gonna drop this in here. 1st half is lots of LB eval/analysis clips, some more off the radar names. Middle is Luke. The back half is a ton of geek analytical mixed with promoting Sumer Sports. May not be for everyone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neBltQ3roiw
  12. Yeah except the QB could throw a curve ball they would have to swing at. If he flops this year are they really thinking a T will fix it? They better be thinking a QB will fix it. This is why a proactive OL stance serves our interests. Another variable is that next year, all these QBs might push a lot of great players down the draft order. If somehow QB is covered, it could be good for us.
  13. 2 plays in 3 years tell me a short yardage power back is unnecessary. got it covered
×
×
  • Create New...