Jump to content

amcoolio

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    1,961
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by amcoolio

  1. I don't get not trading. Anyone left here at 8 that they want could be there at 15. Guess teams aren't budging
  2. Trade down please, draft has gone about as bad as I expected 1-7
  3. Pat McAfee Show is killing it right now if anyone wants an alternate coverage
  4. Tons of late bettors hammering Lance to where he is now the clear favorite, they most know something.
  5. Don't know if posted but it looks like Trey Lance is going #3 if the 49ers don't trade the pick
  6. ♪ Draft a weapon ♪ ♫ Pitts, Chase, Waddle, Smith in that order ♫ ♪ We wonnnnn't regret it ♪
  7. There is a great chance one of Robby or DJ are not on the team after next year. We need weapons as much as we need a tackle or cornerback.
  8. I will never understand you guys not wanting to add weapons in this age of the NFL where offense and teams with multiple weapons that are hard to stop win out over others. Pass on Chase if he's the one left at 8? Are you mad?
  9. Thats like saying "I'm not taking Shaquille O'neal at 8 because I don't value the center position" Nobody looks back 5 years later on the draft and says "Oh, I see why Carolina didn't take the HOF tight end talent, they needed an offensive lineman at the time" Take the best player when you have a high pick. Simple as that.
  10. We need talent at every position except RB, so... best player available. Chase, Pitts, Parsons, Horn, Sewell, Slater, Kaye, all huge upgrades I wouldn't take the 4th or 5th QB in the class at 8 so I'll say QB
  11. Take Pitts or Chase, elite talent trumps need Also Slater can be our franchise LG for a decade and we still need one of those too
  12. Atlanta isn't staying at 4. They don't want a QB and don't want to reach for something else. Some team like Denver, New England or Washington will make a godfather offer to go up and get Fields.
  13. If Pitts is there you have to take him. a Gronk/Kelce tight end just opens up way too much for the offense and makes it impossible to stop no matter what the line is. I think Sewell/Slater is the best bet, still hoping for Slater as our franchise LG and signing Villanueva or Wagner or bringing back Okung to be our LT
  14. I would easily do Patriots 2021 2nd, Patriots 2022 2nd, 2022 4th to move back to the Patriots spot Edit: if Pitts and Chase aren't there. at 15 we can still get an elite player because of all the QB's taken. one or more of Waddle, Devonta Smith, Slater, Surtain Jr., Vera-Tucker, Darrisaw will be there
  15. Good trade. 2nd round pick on a 23 year old QB flyer that has had great stretches of games before but was in a terrible organization like....Robby Anderson Now get Slater, Sewell or Pitts and lets go
  16. Would MUCH rather have Pitts/Darnold or Waddle/Darnold than Lance or Fields. Not even a question. The first 3 picks are already decided according to people I trust. Lawrence Wilson Jones
  17. Draft is O-Line heavy. Take Pitts at 8 then spend the next 3 picks on the line. Can never have enough weapons. Also there are some free agent tackles left that are still decent (Villanueva, Wagner, Okung)
  18. Don't reach for a QB Some sick players will be there at 8 because of all the QB's taken
  19. Did I criticize you? Maybe I shouldn’t have quoted you but absolutely no one should be dismayed that we didn’t trade two future firsts to move up for a 50% or greater chance to bust on a quarterback. Besides Lawrence each quarterback has a high chance to bust. Why use 3 #1s to take that opportunity? I’m just tired of everyone crying the sky is falling because we don’t have our future QB yet. It’s insane.
  20. I wasn't aware that you could only get a quarterback in the 2021 draft or you are screwed for eternity. Oh well. These guys just aren't worth it dude, no clue why everyone is overreacting Much better players available at 8 than QB, especially if QB's are all taken 1-4
×
×
  • Create New...