tiger7_88

So you're saying that Gettleman exercised the franchise option on Hardy knowing he was going to be accused of domestic abuse? Could you explain in detail how Gettleman knew such a thing? Crystal ball? Tarot cards?

Please explain, in detail, how any of this was "this organization's" fault. Dis gon' be gud...

Thank you for the clear answer. You are, of course, 100% correct. My question was rhetorical, but it never hurts to have the clear facts states like you have above. Now, that being said, how many NFL teams are going to be willing to risk signing someone that will likely be found guilty (near 100% chance, as you say) in a civil action regarding charges of domestic abuse?

Wait, what? Why would he need to "settle" on anything?

I hate those kinds of posts. "Waaaaaaaaaaah I don't want you to post something because I don't want to talk about it waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!" People should post and talk about what they want to talk about. And those who don't want to talk about it? Just ignore it. P.S. According to the rules of the forum as set out by Mr. Igo, of course. P.S.S. A second (or even third or fourth) thread talking about the EXACT same subject is also kind of dumb. But this thread isn't one of those threads since Mr. Igo's thread is talking about the details of why Hardy won't be re-signed by the Panthers and your thread is referring to an NFL.com article and inviting discussion on it.

Yeah, I just cried my little heart out when Auburn signed Greg "2nd Overall Pick in the NFL Draft" Robinson instead of Cyrus "Dee Ford Stole My Manhood" Kouandjio in 2011. Thanks for the video though, always good for a laugh! And good luck to Cyrus now that Buffalo is moving him to OG... maybe he'll finally have some success there since he obviously sucks at being an OT. I'm sure you are proud of the one and only game Buffalo activated him for in the 2014 season. 2nd round draft pick... only active for one game... oh lawd lol .

They should allow him to participate in both.

No, little man, I can just see with open eyes which one will be productive at his position in the NFL and which one will not. We already know after this year the answer to the "not" side in the NFL in 2014. We learned very quickly that the slap move and the tackle move aren't NFL moves for a left OR a right tackle, which left your boy right out in the cold. Now watch and learn about the "productive" side in 2015, i.e. the older brother.

Coming from me? You mean the Auburn fan talking about the Bama player? That "you"? Stop being a dumbass, bae.

Not his twin, his (one year) older brother. And older Kouandjio is a much better prospect at OG than his brother ever was at OT. "May not even get drafted"??!?!?!?!?! I wouldn't be surprised to see him off the board before the end of the 3rd round.

There is one thing you can control about media bias... You can point it out when it occurs.

Brings at least as much or more value than your response to it.

Now does this guy look underhanded and dishonest to y'all?

Because they expect him to reject it maybe?

I enjoyed this: http://boards.atlantafalcons.com/topic/4022787-falcons-using-fake-crowd-noise/page-3 Good job, guys! :thumbsup

Oh well... you rolls the dice, you takes ya chances.

My opinion of Vick is that he's turned his life around rather well and realizes the scrutiny he lives under. His brother on the otherhand... ummm... wow. The best thing to happen to Mike Vick was to be released by Atlanta because that organization constantly covered for his former behavior and mistakes. Arthur Blank is the worlds biggest pencil-lipped douche.

That must be why the majority in this forum and pretty much everybody I know refer to him as Ben Rapelisberger. Because all has been forgiven and forgotten due to his lily whiteness! This ain't an issue of race. But I guess you can keep trying to make it one.

Frankly, I'm giving both parties in this case 100% benefit of the doubt. Much unlike Richie Incognito who I condemned from the start because, knowing his history, I knew the guy was a bullying douche. Does this mean I hate white people?

That is an excellent point. I agree. But it seems that the result is that she WAS moved out of the apartment, unless the fact that she met the CMPD in the building elevator as stated in the restraining order is false. And, again, stating "I ran into the police in this location" is an easy fact to prove/disprove.

Actually, I have formed absolutely no opinion about what has happened. I have no fugging idea what went down. I don't want an innocent man to be labeled a domestic abuser. And I don't want an abused woman to be labeled a pyscho bitch. And I don't know who is innocent, guilty, either, or both. I'm just pointing out some of the cockamamie inconsistencies in the current "psycho bitch" fest.

Yep, video eliminates a lot of he said/she said.

There's definitely some lying going on. And it doesn't have to be one or the other, it could be both.

You guys need to get your story straight. She wouldn't leave the apartment, so they called the police. She tried to leave, so they held her down and called the police. She's a stupid psycho bitch on Mike and Ikes. She's a genius, scheming tart who wants Hardy's money. Roll the dice and pick your favorite, I guess.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24562492/woman-alleges-greg-hardy-threw-her-on-couch-covered-in-guns In the Motion for Protective Order: Its gonna be easy as pie to prove/disprove that she was or was not in the apartment if she claims to have run into the police in the elevator. Just ask the police. Again, if she was out of the apartment, why did they need the police to get her out of the apartment? Like I said, anyone who thinks anything has been cleared up in this issue is just looking for a chance to jump (for SOME REASON). Yeah, yeah, I know... psycho bitch... Mike and Ikes.