TD alt

He has been accused once in highschool and once in college. Not a good look. I wouldn't want him on my team.

By the way, Greg Olsen would've been worth it to the Bears had they known how to use him, but they're the ones that fuged up.

I saw what Clark and Shockey did, and there is a huge argument that they were key players in their championship runs (meaning that their respective teams don't win without them). Being a legit receiving threat, but more importantly, a legitimate outlet for your QB, particularly on money downs, is very important. If you want to argue against that, then you're right, we don't have anything more to discuss on this issue. I'm not stumping for Warren either. I've consistently said BPA, and I doubt he's going to be it.

I wouldn't this year, but TEs can be important to the offense, and a QB's best friend depending if they are the right fit. It's not all about simple stats, though the best ones in history put up fairly prolific numbers.

Brock Bowers, and I'm standing on that. Jeremy Shockey and Dallas Clark were probably worth it as well.

Well, you really never know how these things are going to go, but let me say this: unlike Devin Funchess, Tet McMillan is a receiver, and he's one with some real production unlike Kelvin Benjamin. Moreover, no one questions his heart, whether or not he wants to play the game, or whether he's a head case. People may forget, that there was something to be excited about after Benjamin's rookie year. There is something to be said for a "big" receiver with a wide wingspan. We've seen it throughout the years. Tet is said to be relatively fluid--movements not expected of a player his size, has an outstanding wingspan, and, most importantly (at least for me), has flypaper hands. For me, that's at least a reason to strongly consider drafting him after working him out to see if he's a fit for what you're trying to do.

Well, that's assuming that it's actually a "reach." I'll add that reaching for any player at any position will not lead to desired results.

https://x.com/Sheena_Marie3/status/1892051814666699253?t=TbV3K7LNa6cR-778D4Ooew&s=19 I mean...I don't know what she's saying or trying to achieve with this one; I don't know what to say. Keep pounding?

You just couldn't say who it is? Come on, man.

I agree, but...you still should draft the BPA and exercise discipline in regards to reaching. Your post speaks to team building as much as anything. That being said, sure college talent is perhaps the main part of that, but free agency should not be overlooked. Zach Baun played a huge part in Philly's championship run. Howie Roseman knows how to build a team (including using free agency), and their scouting department knows how to spot talent.

Starks will go to a team like Pittsburgh and become a potential Hofer.

Garrett has played at an historical level. He's up there with Deacon Jones and Reggie White. Just saying. Parsons may be younger, but he isn't better. -------------- In general, I don't think it's realistic that we trade for either one of them. That's akin to Pyrex fantasy.

Yeah, I'm a Georgia alum, and I don't see Walker as elite...not yet, anyway.

Both of whom are likely outside the top 10, just saying.

Go Dawgs!

Yeah, some people in this thread are letting their Smitty hate show. Cam shouldn't have said what he said, period. Smitty could've reacted a lot worse, as could CJ. Some others probably have some thoughts on the issue as well. You don't throw your teammates under the bus in public. Cam has certainly lost some cool points.

I mean, Eagles' fans booed Santa Claus. So...

"Trouble creating separation" is a bit much from what I've seen and have been reading.

I'll pass at that number.

According to what I've read, any "talent" at edge outside of like three guys is highly speculative. So there may be guys there, but they're not exactly grading out as guys that can come in and make an immediate impact; It's more like any draft.

Because it's in your blood.

It's not even really a Huddle thing, even analysts think that we need to get Bryce another legit weapon. Losing to the Chiefs and Eagles still equals two losses at the end of the day. Beating the Falcons the second time around was great, but our record was not. We made strides, but hooking our bandwagon to an old guy is not ideal. I say just draft the BPA, if that happens to be McMillan if he's still on the board, it is what it is. If it's Malaki Starks (or possibly Carter or Graham, both if whom I think will be gone), I'm good with that too. FA will go a long way towards determining what's what.

I like McMillan as well, but it's not a surety that he's a WR1 (and there's no surety that he's destined to be the best WR in this class). That being said, at the moment I'd say he'd be a good bet.

Best player available. If that's a WR, then it is what it is. Sorry (not sorry). You don't reach for a player at a position of need because you feel like it. Reaching is arguably how we ended up where we are today. Thielen is not a WR1, it doesn't look like Legette is either. Coker isn't a WR1. We arguably have three guys with WR2 upside (if we're lucky...which we're not). WR is on our list of needs, whether you like it or not. You look at what you're in the market for, choose the player with the highest grade, and put in your card. If you can trade down to gain value, then you can consider that as well. This is how this works.