Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 Summer Transfer Window: Rumors, Completed Deals, Pipedreams!


C47

Recommended Posts

He'll demand a move to one. I'm just less sure about the Barca link than others. I don't think they'll pony up to the release clause. I think Madrid will offer more to Liverpool and Suarez.

Apparently Suarez release clause is top secret. Some report that his release clause is £65 to Spanish club and £80m to English club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was weird he was being linked to Arsenal. What do you thinkabout Balo at £30m?

Wenger will not pay £30. £25m yes. Plus Milan have to get his wages of the book. I think Puma might pay £5m in difference. Balotelli is a perfect fit for Arsenal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wenger will not pay £30. £25m yes. Plus Milan have to get his wages of the book. I think Puma might pay £5m in difference. Balotelli is a perfect fit for Arsenal.

 

Yea. Milan is in deep poo right now. They can't be trying to squeeze ever drop of money from a move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Balague says Suarez prefers Barca, who may offer Liverpool Sanchez and Pedro plus cash."

Looks like we may be partial to receiving players, so as not to leave replacing Suarez up to chance.

That's good deal. Sanchez is worth £20m. Pedro is gonna suck in EPL. Stay away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wenger will not pay £30. £25m yes. Plus Milan have to get his wages of the book. I think Puma might pay £5m in difference. Balotelli is a perfect fit for Arsenal.

 

As a Milan and Balo fan, there very little chance he goes back to England, even less for that to be Arsenal. Big wildcard tho is his agent......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...