Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vick to Chicago!!


Mainter

Recommended Posts

The way our PSLs work (from my friend and parents) is that you pay a yearly fee per seat and buy the season tickets. Any year you don't buy tickets, or pay your fee, or fail to purchase post season tickets, you lose your PSL. I think that's how it works. It keeps you from skipping out on any payments.

It irritates my folks because they had to buy play off tickets last year, even thoug we didn't have any home playoff games. But that deposit went towards the next years PSLs.

You only pay the PSL fee once. You then pay for season tickets each year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if there were no PSL's sold to finance the stadium, we wouldn't have a team here. You don't actually "own the seat", you own the RIGHT to purchase the season tickets for Panthers games for the seats you own the rights to.

Here is the wording directly off my PSL contract:

"Licensee has the right and obligation to purchase the related season tickets from the Franchise for all home Games (pre-season, regular season and postseason, if applicable) for the Team for as long the Team plays in the Stadium. PSLs do not apply to Super Bowls or any other events which may be held at the Stadium, such as the Shrine Bowl, college games, concerts or all star games. All payments for tickets are due upon receipt of invoice from the Franchise."

and that is a good point. Your PSL money went to building the stadium....great idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if there were no PSL's sold to finance the stadium, we wouldn't have a team here. You don't actually "own the seat", you own the RIGHT to purchase the season tickets for Panthers games for the seats you own the rights to.

Here is the wording directly off my PSL contract:

"Licensee has the right and obligation to purchase the related season tickets from the Franchise for all home Games (pre-season, regular season and postseason, if applicable) for the Team for as long the Team plays in the Stadium. PSLs do not apply to Super Bowls or any other events which may be held at the Stadium, such as the Shrine Bowl, college games, concerts or all star games. All payments for tickets are due upon receipt of invoice from the Franchise."

Just for grins, I pulled out my contract and was looking at some of the stuff in there (I ran into it the other day while looking for something else).

That contract has got some teeth in it, doesn't it? I guess specifically the section about your responsiblity if someone else uses your tickets and doesn't follow the rules. It's nothing I didn't know, but reading the legaleze brings it all home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We would still be watching the Redskins every Sunday on Charlotte TV if if weren't for the PSL holders. Give it a rest.

How do you know that? We still could have gotten the team without PSL's. The PSL's just locked it for us but it doesn't mean we wouldn't have gotten the team without them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That contract has got some teeth in it, doesn't it? I guess specifically the section about your responsiblity if someone else uses your tickets and doesn't follow the rules. It's nothing I didn't know, but reading the legaleze brings it all home.
I actually had the chance to speak with Jon Richardson on this issue during the post-season... there was a company in Connecticut that lost their Patriots' season tickets privileges because a male guest of theirs used the ladies' restroom at a game and was arrested for it. Jon said that if something like that happened here, the PSL owner would at least receive one warning before their PSLs could be revoked. I told him that in my opinion, a PSL owner should never be left out in the cold on something like that... they should have the right to sell their PSLs rather than having them yanked.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you know that? We still could have gotten the team without PSL's. The PSL's just locked it for us but it doesn't mean we wouldn't have gotten the team without them.

I don't think that the Richardson's would have spent there own money on the stadium, and the taxpayers of CLT would have been in an uproar. The league would likely not have awarded the team without the Richardson's showing that the city could support it. The selling of PSL's ensured a guaranteed ticket base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the City would have worked something out look at how they aredoing to Nascar Hall of Fame. Granted this is 12 years later but the city and state would have stepped up and came up with the money. I just don't like the way the PSL's are setup, Yes I am a owner but it locks out alot of the fans from getting season tickets. Not everbody can afford that much money to buy them and it has an "elitest" feel to it. I think sooner or later the PSL's are going to be priced out of range that only the rich can afford them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that funding the stadium was the only issue with the NFL awarding Charlotte the team. The Richardson's needed to show that the community would support the team and the PSL's were one way of guaranteeing that the tickets would be sold. The team would have bled money in the losing seasons had the tickets not been sold to the PSL owners, whether they attended the games or not.

Heck, I didn't like forking over the dough for my PSL's either. We have only had them for a few years. But, due to us not being a huge market and die-hard fanbase overall (yet :) ) we will have to deal with these sorts of things to make sure that the team is supported.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, it sucks to not be able to decide out of the blue to go on a Sunday because the game is 'sold out'. Then you turn on the tube to watch it and the stadium is half empty.

Alot of good games sell out quick, weeks in advance.

But I guess I really just don't want to go that badly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. With Panthers PSLs, you pay an upfront fee (mine was $3900 way back when) then you purchase your season tickets each year -- no yearly fee, just season tickets. You must purchase your season tickets and playoff tickets, or you lose the PSL with no refund.

The 'upfront' fee is the price of the seat(s)...a one time charge, and that is correct; you have to purchase season tickets yearly or you forfeit your seats.

A PSL gives you the right to sit in the same seats the rest of your life and the only other fee you would have to pay is the transfer fee if you would decide to sell the seats to another person....I think $250.

BUT, as a PSL owner, you are NOT required to purchase playoff tickets:disgusted

The stadium sends you a letter in December (from my personal experience) if it looks like the Cats are heading to the playoffs.

They simply ask if you would like to purchase tickets for your seat(s) in the event the Panthers have a home playoff game(s).

If you reply no, then your seats are up for grabs through the stadium or TicketMaster.

A PSL owner is required to pay for 10 home games yearly.

2 pre-season and 8 regular season games:Banane09:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's how it reads from the playoff invoice from last season:

"FULL PAYMENT (tickets and handling charge) MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 9, 2005. PARTIAL ORDERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Please note: terms of your PSL agreement require the purchase of all post-season games played at Bank of America Stadium. Failure to purchase the Playoff Package will result in cancellation of your PSL Account and forfeiture of all monies paid to date."

And yes, the all caps words were just like they came in my invoice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think playoff tickets are required too. Livermush I agree. The big thing I will what will happen when BOA Stadium is old and the team wants a new stadium. I know it still years away but the PSL's are only good for this stadium and not the next one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You want Josh McDaniels to be our Head Coach so all your narratives need to end 
    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...