Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Grade the Panthers Day 3 and Overall Draft.


  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. Grade the Panthers Day 3 Draft

    • A
      18
    • B
      41
    • C
      23
    • D
      4
    • F
      5
  2. 2. Grade the Panthers Overall 2015 draft

    • A
      19
    • B
      46
    • C
      20
    • D
      3
    • F
      3


Recommended Posts

As for my grade, I'll give it the only reasonable grade I can an I = incomplete.  It's simply too soon to tell right now.  I would have preferred not to have given up our 3rd, but other than that, I have no problem with any of the trades.

 

Thompson - I didn't like the pick at the time.  But that was more because I wanted someone else, than anything about Shaq as a player.  I think he'll actually be a very good addition to our defense, and will make us much more dangerous.  And I get the impression that McDermott has been limited in what he would like to do because we didn't have the personnel, but Shaq may allow him to be more creative in his game planning and play calling.

 

Funchess - He was one guy I really didn't want heading into the draft; I just saw him as a KB lite, and felt we needed more speed instead.  After researching him a bit more, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.  He's probably more athletic than I gave him credit for, and may be a little better at YAC and getting downfield than KB.  So, I'll reserve judgment until I see how we use him, and how effective he will be.  But I do see the matchup problems he'll create along side of KB.

 

Williams - This pick is one I loved.  I wanted a LT, but am happy to have a true road grader next to Turner.  That should really open up our running game, which in turn will help open up our passing game.  I see us as a much more complete and balanced offense this season.

 

Mayo - I was shocked at the pick because he was a no-name that I knew nothing about.  And even since he was taken, there's little to be found except some short highlights.  But I like what I saw from those highlights.  He seems to be a relentless player with a great motor and diagnoses the play pretty well.  He also appears to be a very good tackler that goes for the strip on every tackle.  In other words, he seems like a ST demon.  He also looks to potentially be a decent backup, but we'll have to wait and see for that.

 

Artis-Payne - Loved this pick as well...particularly where we got him.  There were other backs I wanted more, but they all went much earlier (this is the position I wanted to use our 3rd on).  So, under the circumstances, I feel good that we came away from the draft with a legitimate RB that can be a solid backup and emergency starter.  I don't think he'll ever be a star, but I do see him as quality depth.

 

I loved the Funchess pick a lot, and I agree with you on the rest, especially the bolded part in the Mayo write up.

 

LOVE that part of his game.  We needed youth on ST, and some "lunch pail" type players.  I think this kid is one of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I loved the Funchess pick a lot, and I agree with you on the rest, especially the bolded part in the Mayo write up.

 

LOVE that part of his game.  We needed youth on ST, and some "lunch pail" type players.  I think this kid is one of those.

 

Yeah, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt with Funchess.  I realize it was more about my own bias and preferences than him as a player.  However, his drop rate and ability to separate are still concerns me a bit.  But I do think he'll be good, I just hope he's good enough to draw some coverages away from KB and Olsen, while opening up the middle.  

 

However, as odd as it sounds, the fact they had him rated as a 1st round player and traded so much to get him makes me feel better about the pick.  They obviously did their homework and he was clearly on their short list, and not some reactionary pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt with Funchess.  I realize it was more about my own bias and preferences than him as a player.  However, his drop rate and ability to separate are still concerns me a bit.  But I do think he'll be good, I just hope he's good enough to draw some coverages away from KB and Olsen, while opening up the middle.  

 

However, as odd as it sounds, the fact they had him rated as a 1st round player and traded so much to get him makes me feel better about the pick.  They obviously did their homework and he was clearly on their short list, and not some reactionary pick. 

 

Cam needs a big catch radius, now we have 3 players with just that.  Ginn can take the top off and let KB, Funch, and Olsen destroy the shorts and intermediate stuff.

 

 

Our QB isn't accurate enough yet, and doesn't "throw guys open" yet, he will get better at that stuff in time, but he's not there yet.  May as well surround him with guys who can high point, and are just physically bigger than the guys trying to guard them.  Oh, and we need to be able to score in the red zone badly, Funch will help that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They can get film of all the games? Every team? Wow! Who knew… Our games with them are big examples of why they are in  the CB market so hard.   It is the study they do getting ready for the games.  Preparing to play against is a little different than just analyzing film in scout mode. Deeper dive. Then you are analyzing post game too.  This goes to why players often change teams but stay in the division. The opponents know each other on a higher level.  Plus if you lost to us, you used to get fired. Now you have to trade your first round pick. Moving up on the world. 
    • I honestly can’t believe this team’s turnaround this season. It’s surreal. Figured healthy we’d be fringe playoffs and with another lottery pick could finally turn the corner, but we don’t even need that. This group is ready. We haven’t played remotely well the last 5 games and yet still blew out 5 bad teams by 16+ each game like it was casual practice. We had a few solid teams with Kemba and Big Al but this is easily our best group since the original Hornets moved to NO. Man, what a shift in culture this new ownership group and front office has brought. So damn happy to see it after years of suffering and consistently meaningless games in this stretch of previous seasons.   Only 2.5 games out of the 6 seed, although Miami, Atlanta and Orlando have been playing well too. Gonna be a fun final stretch, hopefully we can get a top 8 seed at the very least. Celtics tomorrow will be a good test. Would be huge to keep the road winning streak up against a very hot top team on the 2nd half of a back to back. We’ve played Boston pretty well the last few years with much of this same group despite sucking so I do feel pretty good about it. Kon is due for a huge game coming off a few cold shooting games (although despite the poor shooting he’s been contributing well with defense, assists and rebounds).
    • It amazes me how underrated Horn has become after he finally was able to stay on the field. Sure last year wasn’t perfect but he was still a huge reason for our rebound defensively and I’d say he’s easily a top 10 corner. You don’t want to see Mike Jackson as our top corner. Any player is available for the right price but I’d be extremely hesitant to move Horn even for a big haul from LA. 
×
×
  • Create New...