Could Romo leapfrog Cam to unseat Brady as MVP?

[bdwork]

This scenario plays out as follows:

Brady's performance tapers off, numbers are still incredible, but has a couple of stinkers perhaps in highly visible games late in the season.

Cam follows the same upward trajectory but we drop 2-3 down the stretch, throw in maybe one off game, sub-60 completion percentage "issue" lingers. 

The left-for-dead Cowboys win out or finish 8-8 and win the NFC East (I believe this would be possible mathematically), Romo plays best football of his career, wins MVP. 

As a Panthers fan, what's your reaction? 

This scenario really adds to the ongoing debate around what "MVP" means:

Brady is the best player.

The Cam camp points to "most valuable" [to his team] case and projects that we'd be 9-7 with DA.

The Romo camp points to an 8-1 or 9-0 record with Romo, and an 0-7 record without, making the "most valuable" [to his team] case a little more empirical. 

Could this even occur? Is there a historical example? 

I'm sure there will be plenty of "don't care, 10-0 is all that matters" responses, but curious what those of you interested think. 

*Note to mods: accidentally posted in the general NFL forum and cannot figure out how to move/delete. If I've overlooked something feel free to shoot me behind the woodshed. 

[PntherPryd]

Skip, get back to First Take.