Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why do we need the Redskins to tie again...

Panther49er

By Panther49er,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jdpanther5 Newbie

jdpanther5

Posted
Posted
Only way I can make it work features a five-way tie with CAR, TB, MIN, & GB at 8-8 and WAS at 7-7-2 of all things.

CAR over TB in the South via conference record.

MIN over GB in the North via H2H.

CAR and MIN are then pitted against WAS. In this scenario MIN would hold a H2H tiebreak over CAR, and CAR over WAS, but these are moot and thrown out because MIN and WAS didn't play each other. Then it goes to Conference record, which the Panthers would win.

Crazy, it's actually better for us if the Redskins tie one of their last two games instead of losing out.

Sent from my SM-N920V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

If Washington isn't in that group of teams tied at .500 then we lose the H2H to Minnesota. With the Redskins it goes to Conference record where we'd hold the advantage.

Sent from my SM-N920V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Top Available FAs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • WUnderhill
      Canes vs Vegas Gm 5 SCF 8PM

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • tukafan21
      Top Available FAs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...