Fournette in the first? What bothers me

[Guest]

That's why they pay scouts to evaluate these kids.  If he grades out as top 10 in this class then he's top 10 by their standards not ours.   Does Dave agree?  Who knows.  

I try not to get caught up in the stats myself nor do I watch countless hours of tape or do background checks on these guys so I leave it to the professionals to decide.  As a fan I just cheer on whoever they pick.  I'm as giddy as a kid on Christmas Eve just thinking about getting some new blood on the team.

Man... you cheered a DT and back-to-back-to-back CBs?

Cus Im all for DGs street credit... but even I had to call that shyt questionable.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

[Jon Snow]

1 minute ago, lasus83 said:

Man... you cheered a DT and back-to-back-to-back CBs?

Cus Im all for DGs street credit... but even I had to call that shyt questionable.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Oh I scratched my head on it when it happened.  But I can't hate on it until we see how these kids turn out.  It was ballsy for sure.

[Salisburysean98]

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Can't compare Cam the way you do other QBs.  Just doesn't work. Sells him short by design of the comparison. 

Cam's best running isn't found in the records people talk about (the historic ones you dismiss)..it is the crazy 3rd down pick ups and first down conversations. It is basically a variation of short pass game totally taken out of discussion because it has never existed in the NFL before. 

Cam simply isn't comparable to date.   People want to use standard QB definition on him that favors the pack and discredits what no one else in history has done.

He definately is more football player than traditional QB....which is why the comparison is just pointless.  

And people will continue to blitz us because they're not scared of Cam Newton. Until Cam's footwork improves and using his eyes, he's nothing more than a 250 lb rb.